![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i didnt know that it needed more to get going anyway im all in jest but seriously man....the evidence is all there |
Quote:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU former director of greenpeace even says its a crock of shit. Guys who had their name fraudulently put on literature saying they agreed with it. At least one guy sued to have his name removed. Scientists from MIT etc disagree with the c02 crap. Watch it then post. |
Quote:
the evidence is all there, that there is no god and he did not create the universe. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So if you have HIV you might was well not give a fuck about getting syphillis. |
the humorous irony of these conversations is that science ultimately seeks truth... no matter what that truth might be. the people making these "scientific" arguments in discussions such as these, are 100% incapable of admitting that there is another side of the argument, much less accept the possibility that they might be wrong. the idea and controversy of Global Warming is degrading from what should be a scientific discussion, to a cult.
|
Quote:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html How do you get so much ice if it's WARMING up? Oh by the way the Mars is warming theory is based on 3 years of data. Yet 120 years of earth data and the jury is still out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
have you ever thought about what you're arguing for? if you're right, nothing really matters. What happens if you're wrong? Frankly, i really hope you ARE right, but what happens dude, if you are wrong? R |
I don't know, we had a pretty fucking cold winter up here this year. Lots of weeks of -40 (and colder).
Where's the warming? |
Quote:
Here is a better analogy. Your river water has 0.055% impurities in it. When you scoop it out into your drinking vessel the vessel (man made) adds 0.005% more impurities to. It's no cause for alarm. |
Quote:
So much for your theory on that point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Lets say 10,000 miles on any of the three. |
Quote:
I believe we should recycle as much as possible as well. |
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
I've generally given up on this 'argument' since it is best left up to the experts. I do follow the discussion and evidence on both sides, but at the end of the day I'd rather err on the side of caution when our environment is concerned. Even among scientists this is a very hot-button issue.
Fortunately most countries have adopted Kyoto and other regulations to decrease the amount of pollution their companies produce. I think the most important argument is what the proper steps are to reduce air pollution and water pollution and other things that have an undeniable impact on us. Any type of greenouse gas benefits will follow suit. I don't think anyone on either side would argue that making cars cleaner and factories cleaner and not dumping toxic materials into rivers and water supplies is a GOOD thing. I support regulations on companies to produce clean vehicles and factories and power plants. That has a direct affect on quality of life for everyone. Whether humans are directly causing a greenhouse effect will be debated for years to come, so I for one will watch as an interested bystander. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, Mars and Earth are completely separate. Can you consider the possiblity that Earth and Mars are heating up for the same reason "solar intensity"? What if Al Gore told you it was true, would you believe it then? And I don't think you are a dipshit, just because we don't share the same opinion on this issue. :thumbsup |
Quote:
So if you don't believe in something it's not true? So if you stepped in front of a train and as long as you didn't believe the train would kill you, you'd live? |
Quote:
"solar intensity" even though the sun's intensity is 30% LESS than what it was during the age of dinosaurs? Go look it up. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123