Originally Posted by aico (Post 12305707)

Here we go again...

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12305622)

The answer is exactly an issue of "jumping on the train" :winkwink:

Sure... this industry is as hypocritical as any other, - often due to two factors (a) lack of judgement by publishers and (b) desperation by the potless hoping to earn a dime.

On one hand, enter high drama over a CP website and five pages of "I hate pedos" and an online-industry slant to try and disown (or is it denial?) that we have anything to do with pedos - "We are the mainline adult industry!".

The flip side of the real "adult industry" is portraying talent as kids of around 12 years of age with hairclips and playing with teddy bears and coloring pens, but with a cock stuck in them.

Along comes screams of justification that "It's legal!" and "I've got 2257 paperwork!". Does the online industry think for one moment that they have generated an original idea by portraying legal talent as children and having dicks stuck in all orifices???? Nope - that level of pedo-marketing has been tried before the online-industry was ever heard of, and resulted in legislation in several western countries to prohibit this sales tactic. Obviously the industry is incapable of policing itself.

Currently there is reference in US law against "pedo marketing" (2257). In most other western countries, there is legislation specifically prohibiting the "styling" of legal talent to imply they are under legal age. Each country varies, but generally legislation falls under obscenity laws or laws related to child protection.

Do images of a carefully selected "small model" decorated with hairclips, pigtails with teddy bears and coloring pens suggest underage??? No, no... the toys just happened to be on the set and the girl just happens to be small in stature (we try hard to find small models). That must be the basis of naming a website "Little Lupe" The hypocrisy is oozing again.

In all countries on the planet, oddly, excepting the US, there exists an treaty in the form of the Convention for the Rights of the Child. The Convention was formulated to, basically provide basic rights to children globally and dampen elements of abuse (in all forms) and give respect to children. "Pedo pandering" by the mainstream adult industry is not exactly in keeping with the spirit of this Convention. It is unfortunate that the US appears to be unable to offer their children the same rights granted in all other nations or enforce the "words" already contained within US law.

Despite claims to the contrary of being "legal" - there are several specific laws stating the illegality - it is up to a jury to decide. Ironically, the offshore jurisdiction used by the operators of "Little Lupe" and where they are represented by Sampson Investments AAV, would not be amused - or care about the technically of laws.

Sure StarkReality - know what you mean about "slogans" - it's basically the same thing, and most prob stemming from an element of "amateurism", trying to be dramatic/shock and appealing to pedos to earn a living. It is amazing how naive and immature the "adult online industry" actually is - but, looking around, perhaps not :pimp

Only my :2 cents: but meanwhile, I'll reject the kind offer of earning based on images of talent dressed to look like 12 year olds and continue to report CP websites to whatever relevant agency.

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12305732)

You can say that again :winkwink: Amazingly pathetic...

Originally Posted by F*** ME I'M FAMOUS (Post 12242825)

Is it worth promoting??? :helpme

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7889/01iz9.jpg

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/9141/04kx9.jpg

http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/5569/30mq2.jpg

Would you promote her?

discuss!

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12305744)

Yes you are amazingly pathetic...

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12305702)

Sometimes my wife puts her hair in pigtails for me and puts on her old Japanese school girl uniform.. Does that make me a pedo cause it turns me on?

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12301237)

Please tell us more about how this sponsor caters to pedos. Dont dance around it. Tell us what you think.

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12306151)

Did you really just say that? :helpme

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12306502)

Are you saying there is something wrong with roleplay?

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12306551)

If it involves one of the parties role playing as a child or young teen then yes there is.... :2 cents:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12306559)

My wife wore that uniform when she was 18 days before she graduated highschool. So is 18 now a young teen? lmao Amazed some people are even in adult with their high falooten morals. lol Wait arent I the republican supposed to be the bible thumping porn hater? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12306559)

Wait arent I the republican supposed to be the bible thumping porn hater? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12306701)

No... can't see anything about politics in this. You are too stupid to belong to any political party, but yes, you have demonstrated hate as a tool to oppose and deride. Don't associate that with politics - that is simply your idiot braincell lost again and rolling over the floor.

BTW.. Instead of asking others about your schoolgirl fantasies and other subjects - take time and find your braincell and feel free to write a cohesive statement of your views - preferably without silly picture posting or cutting and pasting/ripping off the words of others. It's the first stage of mental development - try it sometime.

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12306833)

You just eat mofos alive with words...

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12306871)

Doubt it *lol* After the fourth word, the braincell is into overload mode and a second later, is deep-fried in batter. The response after that can vary from "You are pathetic" to "My wife dresses up as a schoolgirl..." and can divert to "You hate America!!" :winkwink:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12306885)

I will never forget the deepfrying you gave me :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12306896)

Shit... can't remember Jon :1orglaugh We have a contest over something? :-) Anyways, apologies sir :winkwink: :thumbsup

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12306926)

lol, Thanks...

Don't worry, I won't be reminding you if you don't remember, I don't want to go back into the deepfryer... lol

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12301171)

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/7889/01iz9.jpg

Sure is ridiculous - never met any 18 year old kid who still played with her "colors" and still had her "toy chair" bla yet - have you??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 12306965)

My wife has a set of "colors" just like that, and well, I have that almost exact same chair as my office chair

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12306989)

And excellent taste you have in office furniture Jace :winkwink: :thumbsup

Just checking out the leopard-skin patterns here for the office suite :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 12307170)

leopard? that is nasty shit right there

glad I have good taste though, thanks

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12307154)

You can almost tell the exact time that someone ICQ's Sticky and advises him to shut up... lol

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12307423)

1: 68 :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup Under 1:70 for the last 3 weeks or so now. :thumbsup

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 12305743)

An articulate post. I agree with many points you made. :thumbsup

ADG Webmaster

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12307434)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

AH.. I'm so pleased you managed to find the braincell again :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Means you can continue the pedo-marketing now - but keep the braincell cool and don't marinate it or lose it again :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 12307450)

that was a good post.

while the corps that own the domain names are in some island, the guy that actually profits from all of these faux-pedo-cp-predator sites is based out of the usa.. his name is Paolo and he brags about not paying taxes and being good at basketball.... both of which are true I'm sure! :)

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 12307450)

that was a good post.

while the corps that own the domain names are in some island, the guy that actually profits from all of these faux-pedo-cp-predator sites is based out of the usa.. his name is Paulo Cammarata and he brags about not paying taxes and being good at basketball.... both of which are true I'm sure! :)

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12307452)

Did you just accuse me of marketing to pedophiles?

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12307484)

Amateur Teen Skanks! 18 Year old sleep overs.. lol

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 12307489)

yep.... and fine one where we suggest that the girl is anything less than a fully pubescent 18 year old model.

stickyfingerz... you REEEK of somebody with an agenda or somebody who is being paid by somebody with an agenda.

I'd be happy to testify that these guys bragged about avoiding taxes through shell corporations... I'd be happy to see them argue their "it's legal so it's ok" in front of a jury in *any* jurisdiction..

If you can actually make me think you are a piece of shit then you are really pushing the limits.

It's a Pedo/Paulo-Gone-Wild! :)

Stickyfinger faggot is a paid poster for teen revenue... anything he says is just pointless.

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12307234)

Hehe... got a friend who built a home in a certain country - it prob cost around.. $6- $8mill plus for the home and also has roughly 8 miles of solid stone wall around the estate which probably cost another few mill.

BUT... He has the most foul taste! When you enter this "palace", it has marble staircases, chandeliers, works of art blah blah - but on the floor and covering the seating are fake leopard skin print materials :1orglaugh That always was a reminder of "chintz" :1orglaugh

Believe me Jace - you have excellent taste in comparison to that :winkwink: :thumbsup

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12307526)

Hypocrisy at its best right there.

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 12307533)

yeah, I have seen that before, like trumps townhouse, all gold and marble and shit....pure crap in gold plating

my office is actually pretty cool, I have pez dating back to 1940 all over the walls and various classic collectible toys on all my shelves...so the hand chair sort of just fits into the motif

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12307561)

Before you divert, as is your usual custom - forget everyone else and look at the subject of this thread.

You have never made any statement generated from your own braincell, other than to describe your fantasies over "Japanese schoolgirls".

As an alleged adult of 30 something years of age, and a father of, soon to be three children, - are you comfortable with boasting about 1:68 conversions to websites which convert on the basis of imaging of a model styled up to look around 12 years of age with pigtails, teddy bears, hairclips and coloring pens and a cock stuck in her mouth??

If you had more than one braincell - it does not need much thought to see why your wonderful conversions are happening. The only element missing from the pedo-marketing is that actual keywords, but instead and thrust up front is a 2257 statement - which actually means nothing in most countries and "may" mean nothing in a US court.

But... perhaps there is a denial on the sole braincell - that would explain much :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12307586)

Yes cause Pornography is all about Reality, and not at all about fantasy..

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12307615)

It is??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh You sure your brain shuffled the logic correctly???

Following on from that it would at least appear what you are saying is that CP is a reality (true) and "pornography is all about reality" and you would probably be getting better conversions with actual pedo content, instead of just the pedo marketing angle simulating scenarios with children being fucked??

I think for prob the first time ever, I would agree with that :1orglaugh :1orglaugh But somehow, don't think the words you used were intended to have that meaning :1orglaugh :1orglaugh