|
Quote:
Only one of the photos of those you posted did I shoot. The one with Ariel, one of my spokesmodels, and the unicorn. If you looked at it in context, you would see that it is a Valentines photo set in which she received a rose, a box of chocolates, and a stuffed unicorn. Nowhere was it implied that she was under 18. Only your mind sees that, since that is apparently what excites you and you go looking for. Ariel appears in dozens of photo sets and videos on my site and she is never portrayed as underage. She recently graduated from college with a degree in computer science. The young "boy"? His name is Peter North. You may have heard of him. The ID for the woman in that picture indicates she was in her mid-twenties when it was shot and she certainly looks it. She is not wearing pigtails or in any way suggesting she is under 18 in that "softcore" photo set. I could go on, but I won't since you are apparently oblivious as to what constitutes a site that obviously panders to pedos, and one which caters to adults. I have no problem with adult role-playing. However when the sole focus of a site appears to be pandering to those with an interest in underage girls, then I have a problem with it. As a father, I would expect you might at least have some reservations, but I guess not. Is shooting porn in Tennessee even legal? ADG Webmaster |
Quote:
|
School girl uniform and pigtails on a young looking Asian girl.. What fantasy does that pander to??
http://www.asiandivagirls.com/tour/m...ah/sarah01.jpg |
she looks HOT!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The model was nearly 30 in that photo, and already had a kid (note the hips - it is more apparent in other photos) - the outfit was hers, and her idea. I never implied that she was under 18. She has a tat and implants. Besides, she never shows more than her fake boobies. And you equate that with Little Lupe? Are you really so stupid?!? Since you want to argue, just what are the laws for shooting porn in Tennesse? Idiot!!! :321GFY ADG Webmaster |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's clear why this is done by design - satisfying the fantasies of pedos is a huge market and the people involved also know this from their "success rate". All they care about is money - if dog fucking was legal (hell knows if it is in whatever countries) - it is poss they would purvey that. Bottom line - there is no judgement in publishing - it's clouded by dollar signs. This "content" is illegal in a fair number of countries - would love to see a few asses in courtrooms trying to defend it in these countries. It may clean up the mainstream adult industry for a few years :winkwink: |
I had to step out for a couple of days...what round is it?
|
Little Lupe for president!
|
Quote:
You continue to avoid talking about the quickbuck site. Why is that? Girls in pigtails on FUCKING SCHOOL BUSES. That seems to be outsider your blinders huh? Girls that ride school buses are nearly ALWAYS under 18, and normally are 16 or under. Yet you ignore that. Fucking fat cunt. |
Quote:
|
She has made me a lot of money.
|
Here is another photo of Sarah from my public area. Certainly doesn't look under 18 to me:
http://www.asiandivagirls.com/tour/m...ah/sarah02.jpg She doesn't quite look under 18 to me in this set either: http://www.asiandivagirls.com/tour/m...a/kenena02.jpg BTW, you didn't answer what the law is for shooting porn in Tennessee? ADG Webmaster |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ADG Webmaster |
Quote:
She is prob a reasonable model and prob do well for many years ahead yet - and good luck to the girl. If people want to portray imagery of a 12 year old kid being fucked to satisfy sicko pedo fantasies - carry on - it's all about earning a dime :thumbsup |
she's cute, promote her....
|
The moral of the story is...people that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
Way to go stickyfingerz:thumbsup Lots of major sponsors, in one form or another, do the same shit that TR is doing... IE: Lollypops, pigtails, teddybears, colorful clothing, bedding, funiture...etc So what makes Little Lupe any different? Also, I don't think these sites are what pedos are looking for...they know how to find the real sick shit online. So drop it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Same people that call weed a gateway drug. lol :winkwink: |
So who IS looking at this site, if not those with fantasies of much younger girls? I have a very appreciative eye for the womanly form and like the (PIC) posts as much as anyone else; yet I find nothing at all entertaining or sexually enticing about LL. I wouldn't feel very good about myself if I did, especially considering that I have a 12-year-old daughter. What is particularly telling is the striking difference between the photos of this model on the LL site as compared to the previously posted Spanish website featuring the same model.
And I also feel this was a very important post yet was mostly ignored by those making their arguments: US Code Title 18 Chapter 110 section 2256 - Definitions for chapter paragraph 8: (8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where— ................. (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or paragraph 11: (11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults. |
i try to avoid her. shes pretty cute and obviously does well, but shes a bit too kid looking n Im not sure i want to attract that kinda traffic.
my personal preference |
stickyfingers and webby sure have a lot of time on their hands to throw around childish insults.
sticky, remember that this thread is about littlelupe, not arlos sites. if there was a thread accusing hooper of presenting what looks to be underage content on one of his sites, the thread would be dead, because he is not doing anything the other 80% of people are not doing, its become the norm. i am not suggesting hooper is clean, just that he is dirty in his own, different way when littlelupe.com came out, first glance at it and i knew it was triplexcash, only company i know that has the balls to put nursery rhythms on their 'teen' porn site tour. lots of people bitching about how she looks underage, but they are putting their links up. have you seen a site go near the top 1000 in alexa within a week? freeones was on here bragging about that accomplishment a few months ago and it took them 10 years to make it http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?o=l&c...=1&h=300&w=610 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and people bitch about it, but some of them secretly wish they had her, because of the traffic, young sells, alexa speaks for itself, paulo does not need to promote the site, it promotes itself. they are getting flack for it, and they should, but they understand thats the cost of getting mass sales. thats just how it is, dont go against the grain :) |
Quote:
Yep. :thumbsup |
Did you guys really stay up all night argueing about this...? :1orglaugh
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Still going on?? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
This thread is too brain dead thanks to Daddy of the Year's lobotomy, but was fun :winkwink: Dammit - screw this "adult entertainment" biz everyone needs to dump all adult sponsors and switch over to purveying images of little girls being fucked and pandering to sicko pedo fantasies - the "pedo entertainment" biz is much more profitable :1orglaugh Pity there is hardly more than a few valid posts (mainly from real webmasters) of any substance out of the whole of this thread - and not one who stood up and offered any legitimate defense of the site (apart from "it's legal" bullshit - it's not). BVF: Quote:
AaronM: Quote:
Another valid point... NikKay: Quote:
Basically agree with your comment above - any youngish model can look underage in a few random shots. This is clearly not a "few random shots", - the girl is styled to look as young as possible for the shoot and "decorated" with kiddy toys etc - all with one aim which is already more than clear. My main "gripe" is firstly of pedo-pandering to human trash. Until a few years back, was kinda naive to this area until I got an "education" into the world of pedos and their victims from law. In the process met a number of victims and .. sheesh.. will never forget, but don't want to discuss here. Many pedo's themselves are victims who were abused and them proceed to abusing others - and some are just downright "evil" and have little thought to killing their victims. Second "gripe" is this supposed to be the "main stream adult industry" - WTF :pimp Since when did "adult entertainment" involve portraying kids on imagery and pandering to the world's human waste?? :winkwink: Only my :2 cents:, but don't consider there is much difference between actual CP and the producing CP fantasies and claiming these are legal (which is actually untrue anyway) - all of them just crawled out of the same swamp :pimp There are many ways of skinning a cat - and look forward to seeing this type of alleged "content" being hit - time and again :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You will continue to avoid commenting on the quickbuck site, and continue being a hypocrite. And stop calling it CP it is not. CP involves a CHILD that girl is an adult. |
Quote:
I don't have much to say. I think both of you could be using this time to make money rather than argue about a topic that has been beat to death already. Seems kinda counter productive to me. If you don't think it's moral or legal then don't promote it. If you're OK with it then go on and make your money. What else needs to be said? |
Quote:
But if you don't agree feel free to keep going, I am getting a good laugh everytime I check back... :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Sure.. agree Aaron - it's up to each to decide. I'll stick with the common-sense and "legal" side of the "adult entertainment industry" and leave the "pedo fantasy purveying industry" to others more desperate for a dime :winkwink: :thumbsup |
hahaha give me a break! All the people that don't like the site has already rubbed one out to her.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's nice. The content was shot in a European country for a European company. |
Quote:
Not familiar with US law and checked with a more qualified source earlier and appears there are about three sections of Civil Code which would possibly be applicable in this instance plus kinda unrelated stuff re the operators. |
Quote:
|
not that im suggesting that its likely they will want to inspect them, but i would say that if you want to be as safe as you can, you would block all US ips, but its possible that may affect sales
|
Quote:
Really? I was under the impression that the content was being distributed worldwide on the Internet. Lets see the documentation you have that shows where the owners live. I'd love to see it. OR are you making assumptions and talking out your ass? |
Quote:
but id bet they do and hooper mentioned they did earlier in the thread and you didnt say anything then and i believe that the govt can go after you if they can show that your distributing the content in the US, although i think most will say the probability of that is pretty small |
Quote:
Do you honestly think I've read this entire lame ass thread? 1: You should not make assumptions without facts. 2: You should not believe everything you read. I have no issue with Hooper. In fact, it's fair to say that I like him. But that doesn't mean that everything he says is gospel. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123