When the porn exist that exist teen niche... schoolgirls, college girls are always exist

yup

8chars

It doesn't matter about the ages that are, it matters what we are referring to when we use "teen" in the adult biz, which is 18 and 19

lol you are way off here...if men wanted to search for child porn or underage...why wouldn't they search for "underage porn" or "child porn"

people that search for "teens" are looking for legal teens most of the time

knowing is half the battle

pwned :thumbsup

Call a spade a spade. If a model is 18, she's a teen. If she's 19, she's a teen. What's your problem?

Long live the teens!

You could have an argument for the end of the use of "girl," though. A girl, by definition, is a female who isn't yet a woman, meaning she's under 18, according to how the U.S. defines a woman. So, technically, a girl is not old enough. A teen can be, however, and often is. :-)

If we talk already about the "teen" word, what´s next ? I am sorry but today it´s "teen", tomorrow it´s "babe" and in 2 years it´s "milf". And of couuuurrrsssee no one likes teens !! No one likes younger (legal) looking girls I know lol :D It´s the same shit when you ask in europe if people consume porn...the answer is 90%: NOOOOO ! Neeever !

If you love this kind of discussions or double standards you should move to germany, they love to make problems if they have too much time.

RIGHT ON!
http://www.grannypussy.com/cut/rose-big2.jpg

50 single moms with braces!

Quite the opposite. No paedophile is going to expect to find underage girls on "regular" porn sites, regardless of whether or not they are using the word teen.

Similarly, the surfers turned on by girls with pigtails, braces, plaid skirts, etc are not paedophiles. No different than maids, teachers and the rest, it is a dressing-up fetish, hence the appeal of similarly dressed girls, clearly well into their twenties and sometimes beyond.

As to the girls often said to be naturally young looking or enhanced to be so, it isn't at all unlikely their appeal is that they actually look like their age. A heck of a lot of the girls out there who may really be 18 and 19, are dressed, made up, manicured and hair-styled to be virtually indistinguishable from older girls. And that's before we starting passing off girls aged anywhere between 20 and 23 as still in their teens.

When a card processor or anyone we are forced to work with, prohibits how we classify what we offer, we may have no choice but to comply. There are things such as labelling our sites, which we should do voluntarily to pre-empt reasonable complaints about our practises. But we are wasting our time attempting to placate those who are against porn in any shape or form: fix one issue and they will simply move on to the next. Pandering to them is very close to admitting we are doing something which, if not illegal, should be. If we cannot refer to a teen as a teen, how much of a leap is it to saying that we should not be showing her at all?

Old Thread Alert!!!!


besides that, why anyone even bothers to give a serious reply to a moron like splum is beyond me. He's a troll nothing more..