GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Man arrested for using cafes free wifi from his car!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=736374)

Ketchup 05-25-2007 11:57 AM

Hi, is it possible to see how many people are connected on to your unsecure connection? Is there a program for that?

Thanks!

uvort 05-25-2007 11:59 AM

"Whether or not you agree with the legality of using an open WiFi network without the owner's authorization, one thing is painfully clear: if you're going to leech, try not to do it from a parked car right in front of the building."

Lol. Thats great.

rapmaster 05-25-2007 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uvort (Post 12487886)
"Whether or not you agree with the legality of using an open WiFi network without the owner's authorization, one thing is painfully clear: if you're going to leech, try not to do it from a parked car right in front of the building."

Lol. Thats great.

heh.. I could still do it in front of the building in my car and they couldn't do shit - not cause they don't have the power, just because I'm not a retard

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketchup (Post 12487879)
Hi, is it possible to see how many people are connected on to your unsecure connection? Is there a program for that?

Thanks!

sure, just go to your router IP where you access your router panel

Pleasurepays 05-25-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peeperpimp (Post 12487875)
Your absolutely right but if they dont take those extra steps how will anyone know if its private property or not...

and lets say you decided to walk thru said park on your way to somewhere else should you get arrested for it even though no one told you or specified it was private property to begin with???

Wouldn't you think you were just taking a stroll thru the park and doing nothing wrong???


you really don't seem to get it. i dont need to put a sign above my front door saying "NO PUBLIC RESTROOM" to prevent people from coming into my house at any time, day or night to take a piss. and "how was i supposed to know his home wasn't a public toilet" isn't going to get you a pass in court.

you don't need to take steps to prevent others from breaking the law. they are expected to not break the law. whether or not people can take additional steps to prevent these situations, has nothing to do with the other person breaking the law.

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12487927)
you really don't seem to get it. i dont need to put a sign above my front door saying "NO PUBLIC RESTROOM" to prevent people from coming into my house at any time, day or night to take a piss. and "how was i supposed to know his home wasn't a public toilet" isn't going to get you a pass in court.

you don't need to take steps to prevent others from breaking the law. they are expected to not break the law. whether or not people can take additional steps to prevent these situations, has nothing to do with the other person breaking the law.

I'm not getting the impression that you seem to be getting it eigther.... this is not about a private home / place its a public place / area so there is a considerably understood diferrence...

Aswell as a diferrent perception of applicably acceptible laws...

it may not be acceptible and may be considered to be against laws to walk into someones house (i.e. trespass) but that doesn't apply to public areas

But than again we could just B misunderstanding each other in which case we're both right

Pleasurepays 05-25-2007 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peeperpimp (Post 12487949)
I'm not getting the impression that you seem to be getting it eigther.... this is not about a private home / place its a public place / area so there is a considerably understood diferrence...

Aswell as a diferrent perception of applicably acceptible laws...

it may not be acceptible and may be considered to be against laws to walk into someones house (i.e. trespass) but that doesn't apply to public areas

But than again we could just B misunderstanding each other in which case we're both right

you said the "park" in your example was private property. thats where it ends. its private property. the owner doesn't need to take any steps at all to warn people that its private property... you trespass, you're in the wrong. end of story.

whether or not he could take extra steps to prevent trespassing is irrelevant. the fact that he doesn't, does not make it ok to trespass on his land.

rapmaster 05-25-2007 12:24 PM

Oh, I forgot to mention... the Staples Wireless Network has BANNED GFY!

what a travesty

Ketchup 05-25-2007 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peeperpimp (Post 12487908)
sure, just go to your router IP where you access your router panel

hmm ok I think this computer I reformated it after I set up the router and it doesn't have any router program on it that I see( I just searched) :Oh crap

If I go to the router website (SMC) and download the software...thats the router panel?


hha I know so little about hardware :1orglaugh :Oh crap

Thanks!

baddog 05-25-2007 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketchup (Post 12487879)
Hi, is it possible to see how many people are connected on to your unsecure connection? Is there a program for that?

Thanks!

yes there is a way to tell

http://192.168.2.1/lan_dhcp.html for Belkin . . . leave pass blank

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12487968)
you said the "park" in your example was private property. thats where it ends. its private property. the owner doesn't need to take any steps at all to warn people that its private property... you trespass, you're in the wrong. end of story.

whether or not he could take extra steps to prevent trespassing is irrelevant. the fact that he doesn't, does not make it ok to trespass on his land.

Your absolutely correct in your point....

But will you please try to understand mine its diferrent than yours...

my point is that even though your trespassing your not aware of it...

I dont think anybody would be since the owner didn't take the extra optional steps to make others aware of it...

It doesn't make it right but should you go to jail / get arrested for it???, I don't think so...

There's no expectation of privacy and or no expectation that people will stay off it... if no notice of any kind is given in such an area...

Although I consider assumptions to be ignorrant, in this day & age people simply just assume and expect that public areas are free for all...

so if the owner doesn't take those extra optional steps (which he doesn't have to) than how could he expect others to know what his expectations are...

After all everyones terms are diferrent...

and some people / communities do put up parks and public AREAS for others to use free...

Example: 2 diferrent parks one public one private both identical in every way with no notices of any kind on eighter...

U walk thru both can you tell which one U trespassed on???

The minute you'd make a judge aware of that situation and the fact that no notice of any kind was given a judge most likely will throw it out of court...

and would consider it nonsense for the owner of said property to even have U arrested, since theres no way for U to have known what the owners expectations where...

Same applies for public WiFi connections since its considered a public area (Not Physical area but still public area non the less)

I should know, since I just asked a relative of mine who's a judge in the state of NJ

collegeboobies 05-25-2007 01:02 PM

If I was arrested, I would sue Microsoft and whoever made my network card. I turn on my laptop, its connected, I dont have a choice to connect or not, no pop up, if you leave your network open, my computer connects. I'd be rich.

Ketchup 05-25-2007 01:09 PM

ok let me check it out, thanks! :thumbsup

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketchup (Post 12488049)
hmm ok I think this computer I reformated it after I set up the router and it doesn't have any router program on it that I see( I just searched) :Oh crap

If I go to the router website (SMC) and download the software...thats the router panel?


hha I know so little about hardware :1orglaugh :Oh crap

Thanks!

no U'd access your panel on the net
i.e. http://yourisprouterip

Contact your ISP they'll give U the ip address

JP513 05-25-2007 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe (Post 12486818)
Take your laptop tp Maui. Open it up on any street in Kahului and you get internet. That's theivery?? Who the fuck am I supposed to pay? Just send a check into the city of Kahului? It's not a secure service. I mean you don't need an acces spas or anything. It just works.

Upcountry I have a desktop and an actual paid connection but if we're out and about you can just get it. I mean it's an XP so it's always just connected to the wifi in town.

And naw man, seriously I had no idea you had to pay for it.

How do you pay for it though? Like if Starbucks has an open connection and 8 other stores in the area do as well, who do you pay?

Redshoe . . . it might be totally a free, legal service in Maui. I'm not usre of this, but that law is Michigan . . . I do know some communities provide free open access.

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:30 PM

Diferrent states diferrent laws, what may be acceptible in one may not be in another (it Varies)

d-null 05-25-2007 01:36 PM

DO THE POLICE EVEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE YOUR COMPUTER TO SEE IF IT IS CONNECTED TO THE STORE'S WIFI??

This just seems crazy to me that charges were every possibly even layed in these cases, without them calling in network experts to access the routers to get mac address info for connections and then acquiring some type of search warrants to get access to the surfers laptop computer.

The guy obviously messed up by incriminating himself to the cop instead of keeping his mouth shut or denying. In none of these cases I can't see how they didn't get off.

NinjaSteve 05-25-2007 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 12487927)
you really don't seem to get it. i dont need to put a sign above my front door saying "NO PUBLIC RESTROOM" to prevent people from coming into my house at any time, day or night to take a piss. and "how was i supposed to know his home wasn't a public toilet" isn't going to get you a pass in court.

you don't need to take steps to prevent others from breaking the law. they are expected to not break the law. whether or not people can take additional steps to prevent these situations, has nothing to do with the other person breaking the law.

Maybe the cafe should say "Internet for paying customers only" just like "restrooms for paying customers only"

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetjet (Post 12488332)
DO THE POLICE EVEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE YOUR COMPUTER TO SEE IF IT IS CONNECTED TO THE STORE'S WIFI??

NO they don't... in the artical the guy kept coming back and after a while he was asked and he told 'em what he was doing.

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NinjaSteve (Post 12488350)
Maybe the cafe should say "Internet for paying customers only" just like "restrooms for paying customers only"

YEP... :thumbsup

2012 05-25-2007 01:48 PM

sheee it
 
I had an apartment building next door going to town on my wireless until I decided to simply secure the connection ... then I felt bad that I ended everyones internet :1orglaugh

uno 05-25-2007 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 12487391)
I'm going to open an oxygen bar and have everyone that walks by and breaths in some of the oxygen that leaks out arrested for not paying for it.

Maybe I'll have a mural painted on the outside facade for my customers to look at. Anyone who walks by and just looks but doesn't shop will also be arrested.

Not a very good comparison.

Take that same oxygen bar, but now you have people coming in and adding extra holes to the oxygen hose to put in their own nosepieces without paying.

d-null 05-25-2007 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 12488450)
Not a very good comparison.

Take that same oxygen bar, but now you have people coming in and adding extra holes to the oxygen hose to put in their own nosepieces without paying.

that's an even worse comparison :)

It would be like an outdoor concert charging people for setting up lawnchairs just outside the fence or on a close by buildings rooftop to enjoy the music for free.

uno 05-25-2007 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 12487471)
Quite the opposite, this is a case of the law not understanding the technology. The technology allows you to secure networks that you don't want just anyone to access.

Like spyware/adware/scumware!

peeperpimp 05-25-2007 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 12488450)
Not a very good comparison.

Take that same oxygen bar, but now you have people coming in and adding extra holes to the oxygen hose to put in their own nosepieces without paying.

in this case the holes where already there owner (added the holes himself ) didn't bother to blug 'em up...

sharp 05-25-2007 02:03 PM

lol that's shitty.

uno 05-25-2007 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetjet (Post 12488474)
that's an even worse comparison :)

It would be like an outdoor concert charging people for setting up lawnchairs just outside the fence or on a close by buildings rooftop to enjoy the music for free.

Eh, I was working with what i had.

Penthouse Tony 05-25-2007 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NinjaSteve (Post 12488350)
Maybe the cafe should say "Internet for paying customers only" just like "restrooms for paying customers only"

That doesn't help since you can obviously access the network from outside the cafe and may never see the sign.

Penthouse Tony 05-25-2007 03:23 PM

I guess all I'm trying to say is that I think people should be expected to be smart enough to protect themselves and therefore their networks. Some people here would rather have the law protect them. That's fine. Just remember that the laws are made by people who say things like this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Stevens
I just the other day got... an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday, I got it yesterday. Why? Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the Internet commercially.

[...] They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the Internet. And again, the Internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.


Zuzana Designs 05-25-2007 03:27 PM

Damn that is crazy !!!

aico 05-25-2007 03:38 PM

People are funny, and this thread proves it.

150 "I didn't knows"

baddog 05-25-2007 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 12489000)
I guess all I'm trying to say is that I think people should be expected to be smart enough to protect themselves and therefore their networks. Some people here would rather have the law protect them. That's fine. Just remember that the laws are made by people who say things like this:

Simply amazing

The Ghost 05-25-2007 03:45 PM

I knew once this thread hit page 4 there were some differences of opinion :1orglaugh

BVF 05-25-2007 03:48 PM

I've been paying for shitty service for a year...It's hooked up to my wireless router and anybody within range can access it if they want..I don't really give a shit and I have never bothered to secure the access...

But the new condo in San Juan is in the tourist resort area and there are MULTIPLE free wireless connections and I'm going to use them with impunity...I'm about to be FINISHED with paying for internet access...

I gave so now I'll take.

CDSmith 05-25-2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12489067)
Simply amazing

I know.

Makes you wonder if they're willing to rationalize this kind of theft, what other ways are they willing to cheat others or otherwise cut corners. :2 cents:

Sarah_Jayne 05-25-2007 04:09 PM

interesting thread just to see how the people that have similar views to mine are the people whose posts I tend to have actually enjoyed reading over the years anyway. I don't even care about the actual issue of wifi theft..it is the bigger picture of rationalizing theft until you can make yourself think it is okay. Then we wonder what is wrong with society these days.

IllTestYourGirls 05-25-2007 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 12486807)
well it both is and isnt as simple as that :)

I was always under the assumption that if you have an OPEN wireless network you were basically "granting" authorization to use the service.

but i suppose that isn't very logical , as just because i leave my house door unlocked doesnt mean i am "granting" authorization to come use my stuff.

If you leave your door OPEN you are.

tehHinjew 05-25-2007 04:18 PM

lol reminds me of that episode with dugmor

Aussie Rebel 05-25-2007 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 12487066)
From the article it didn't look like the cafe really cared much.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Bet thats what AFF says about content theft too

tranza 05-25-2007 05:24 PM

Is that really illegal?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc