![]() |
I'm not sure of the reasons for banning Little Lupe on AL4A and/or Worldsex.
I'd appreciate a note from them explaining. Other huge portals are doing serious number$ with her. |
Lol, solid reason they gave you. Man I went out last night an ran into a girl that really but really looked like she was 16 years old, but it turned out she was 21. Think there are a lot of girls that look underage. People just like young and innocent look.
|
Quote:
And I also agree that she doesn't look 18. :2 cents: |
Quote:
The acid test could be "Can you stand in front of a jury and convince them that these kind of sites don't cater to the pedo market?" Fat chance. WorldSex applied the "looks like" test (tho they may have screwed up on sponsor links) and that is their right. Several other established sites apply the same test - it's not just about whether "whatever" is legal. It's about judgement to publish. |
Quote:
You gotta be careful what you say, you will get yourself in alot of trouble :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
apparently its not just beauty thats in the eye of the beholder - its also the imagined 2257 records.
anyone can check and find out shes of legal age - but that is never good enough for webmasters and whoever looks at her. She is going to be judged simply because she has a young looking face... thats it. Alot of self righteous people out there that even when presented with facts - they still go ape-shit then start pointing fingers and call everyone 'pedo'. Companies such as this are not going to be stupid enough to promote someone underage |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Doubt the issue is over whether she is of age. Of course Lupe is 20 whatever and it is assumed the US domestic law records are in order. (Tho the legal standards of the US do not neccessary apply in other prime wired countries where they may have more stringent laws.) Totally agree with you in that the attention these kinds of sites get in the adult industry is not usually over whether she is legal in the US or not, but because she is young looking - plus the blantantly obvious scenario overall and the undesireable appeal this may have. There never was a law which stated - "You shalt publish anything which is termed legal". Webmasters are no different to media editors - we are all responsible for published content and, ultimately, this is a matter of judgement. Sure, that judgement may involve legal issues, but it extends further than that - and always has. WorldSex are using their judgement in this instance. They know the usual legal formalities are probably in order, but elected not to publish under the "looks young" test. Several other established websites/sponsors use exactly the same test. This is not new or connected with "hypocrisy". The fact that these type of sites even create any kind of contraversy within the adult industry - forget any "public opinion" - may be a clue something may be wrong. |
People are talking about Little Lupe so much because she's blowing up in popularity. As a person that promotes solo girls a lot, I can think of many girls off the top of my head that look more "childish" (and I'm sure they're not either - just posed that way a bit). In fact in my eyes, she's definitely not even the youngest looking Teen Revenue girl.
|
Quote:
Edit... 50 dumb ass opinions |
Quote:
Lupe is an OK model and was long before any "contraversial" website was created. It's the marketing angle which is more the talking point. |
Quote:
thank you for the advice alexanderv, i taking notes here, in fact ive use the same text as on the little lupe site..:) |
the diesel action team have some really young looking girls too
|
Quote:
its very douchey of each and every person that points it out... from you i see it as just dust kicking though...others, i think deeper issues lie... ephebophile.... big fucking deal... and how do you know they wont like that shit too... people that argue this point are wasting their fucking time... its all fucked up shit... and for the record... Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
need to throw that little lupe in the ring with casey, let em wrestle it out.
|
Quote:
|
So.. Quick! Someone tell me how to think!
Are we grouping every teen site with he word "Little" as a CP site now? We need to rename this board dramaqueens.com |
Quote:
|
im going to start a website dedicated to legal models who are discriminated against because they look young ..
Imagine bars used this approach , "sorry you cant come in , even though you have a valid drivers license that shows your of legal age to drink , we feel you look to young " haha, "you have to come back in overalls please" |
Quote:
Well.. there's this thing called a brain. You switch it on in the morning and flip it to "editorial judgement" and start writing websites. You then decide what to "publish" or not - prob depending on many factors. It's hard to get anyone to do that for you unfortuntely - wish it wasn't :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't mix with scumbag liars - and have no interest in their opinions on any subject :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"I don't mix with scumbag liars - and have no interest in their opinions on any subject" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It may be your little joke again suggesting this - that is your defensive mechanism kicking in - twisted as usual and not far off another lie. You are a totally dishonorable scumbag who lies with malicious intent - you know it and I know it - quit kidding yourself. Go :321GFY swamplife |
Quote:
provenlegit.com |
Quote:
|
Quote:
but you know what im talking about... |
Quote:
Words are fun. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Imagine how rich someone would get if they developed a pill that prevented girls from going into puberty... Then when they hit 18 they could legally sell pedo-material Knowing how greedy some people are in the world, I'm sure someone is working on it or has tried to find a way to do this |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, I do have "issues" re "underage sex" and I'll be please to send someone along to "educate" you on these aspects - tho it may be at a time of their chosing - but can be formally or informally - that's their decision. Quit trying to attempt any fucking dialog with me swamplife :321GFY |
Quote:
funny thing is that when that site was released (as i bet before with littleapril), i bet a slew of sologirl site owners breathed a sigh of relief, figure that one out |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123