![]() |
Quote:
King harbor emergency room is dealing with severe trauma issues that are more life threatening than abdominal pain and vomiting blood. WTF do you think free medical care would do to change the situation? They have triage where they have to make a determination of who gets treated first. I remember when I got my face split open and nose broken from a high speed ceiling fan, or when I was in a bike wreck and had two broken bones in my leg and multiple others in my foot. I had to wait my turn. The fact that a little kid came in after me, that they thought needed more attention than I did meant I had to suffer and wait it out until they had time for me. Does shit happen? Of course. Will socialized medicine make it go away? Not a chance. |
To sum it up . . . people die in emergency rooms around the world every day.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i wanna c it too
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who do you treat first? |
Quote:
I'm all for capitalism and the advancement of the medicine. Heck, my brother is a chemist for one of the big pharm companies. But insurance companies and drug companies should not be making the decisions of our doctors. When I go in, the doctor should be making decisions on what he thinks is right, not what the insurance company deems as acceptable. He should be prescribing drugs based on what he feels is best, not by which country sent his family to Tahiti. Those are the first changes we need to make in our healthcare system that has nothing to do with socializing medicine. |
Quote:
That is the reason for having "emergency treatment" centers. If they cannot manage the workload, there are serious deficiencies. PS Excluding the obvious major incidents involving 100's of people. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
thats how it works int he land of the free.......right!? |
Quote:
Maybe someone from Canada/France/UK can chime in later. Id like to hear if the situation is different there for emergency care. |
Quote:
If an emergency started eg at home - emergency ambulance services will organise shipment to the nearest facility - again, without any charges. The relevant criteria is time and ensuring patients are delivered to treatment center's asap - it is not a financial consideration or *any* other factor than immediate treatment for the patient. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Emergency services either have facilities to treat patients in their catchment area or not. If they can't handle a reasonable anticipated workload - there is a problem?? No?? |
Quote:
You think there is a one-to-one ratio of doctors to patients or something? Get your head out of the clouds. |
Quote:
Most of the western world have full emergency care facilities and these are staffed to deal with anticipated numbers of incidents 24/7 and the level of emergency care is high. And no - they don't have 1-to-1 ratio of doctors - that is not necessary, but specialists/surgical staff are available if needed. |
Quote:
his post was completely valid and you respond with that juvenile crap fuck you baddog you aint shit |
Quote:
Where do you think we should get these emergency room doctors from? You have no clue what an emergency room in LA County is like. You probably live in a country that has less people than LA County has. It is easy to staff something that small. Quote:
Oh that's right . . . noone. |
Quote:
The thread is about a movie called "SICKO" which was a reasonable portrayal of different sets of circumstances in various countries and pointing out blatantly obvious differences between different systems. If anything, it should have at least been an education. And no - emergency care facilities are geared - or should be geared - to handling the numbers of potential patients within their catchment area irrespective of size. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In Canada I have never waited more than an hour to be seen in the 3-4 times I have gone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We aren't talking about lawyers here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is not exactly a unique issue to LA area in particular - there are many heavy metropolitan catchment areas in many countries and they manage very well. Have no clue as to the internal arrangements of hospital operations, but may be related to finance in the US? I have no clue, but from the little I know, that seems probable. |
Quote:
You have zero logic but thats ok. |
Quote:
what do you think happened? the doctors were all off golfing, or they just wanted to see how long you would stick around? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Vancouver 2.5 million The simple reason is emergency rooms in the US are filled with people there for non emergencies as its the only guaranteed way for many to get medical attention. In canada the majority of the patients in emergency are there for emergencies. If you can't see that, then your hopeless to it. |
Quote:
I've only been in three emergency units in my life.. and each was in a different country - but got immediate attention and basically a quick ID while treatment was in progress. And every incident was free of charge although I was not even a citizen of two of these countries. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But if you add free health care guess what happens? Doctors either take the new wages or they find work elsewhere. Oh but every other western civilized country is the same, so where can they go. They stay in the US and keep on being doctors. If the US offers private care as well some will stay private, but the majority will remain in the free system. Its not rocket science. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123