GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Cc Bill Im Calling You Out!!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=766347)

Nubiles 09-06-2007 06:57 AM

http://www.skinvideo.com/adult/searc...tspeed&x=0&y=0

http://www.skinvideo.com/adult/searc...vgirls&x=0&y=0

http://www.skinvideo.com/adult/searc...ubiles&x=0&y=0

ServerGenius 09-06-2007 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13045439)
funny how ccbill also does billing for bulletinboardforum:Oh crap

you have any idea for how many sites they do billing? It's not like to bill
for 10 sites. I can apply for a billing account with any sites get approved
and then change my site......I'll probably get away with it for quite a while
UNTIL someone reports me through the proper channels.

So if you come across sites that have illegal content inform the owner of
the content, send him the link of the site and tell him to report it to CCbill
problem solved......that site could have been closed by now......get my point?

Ripshit 09-06-2007 07:12 AM

This is the problem with content theft sure,but back to my original question which was never really answered.....

Ripshit 09-06-2007 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13045535)
This is the problem with content theft sure,but back to my original question which was never really answered.....

CCBill Why do you support several torrent type sites that exploit other peoples hard work?

In my opinion you do it for the money.

All this contact us well drop them shit is all nonsense to me.

You shouldnt work with content thieves its not good for your reputation.

Obviously peoples mind set on greed no one is just going to drop CCBill as a group,but I really hope this thread shows people how back stabbing you guys really are over there!

OG LennyT 09-06-2007 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13045568)
CCBill Why do you support several torrent type sites that exploit other peoples hard work?

In my opinion you do it for the money.

All this contact us well drop them shit is all nonsense to me.

You shouldnt work with content thieves its not good for your reputation.

Obviously peoples mind set on greed no one is just going to drop CCBill as a group,but I really hope this thread shows people how back stabbing you guys really are over there!

Time to get to school idiot, the bus is waiting outside :)

On second thought, please skip today and keep posting in this thread. I love reading emotional rants from people who have no fucking clue. :1orglaugh

Angie77 09-06-2007 08:46 AM

I wonder if they'll address this issue.

Angie77 09-06-2007 08:47 AM

I wonder if they'll address this issue.

ServerGenius 09-06-2007 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angie77 (Post 13046367)
I wonder if they'll address this issue.

they already did :2 cents:

Ripshit 09-06-2007 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angie77 (Post 13046367)
I wonder if they'll address this issue.

They already did address the issue,and it was clear in the statement made in fewer words that "They would be more than happy to not do anything about this"!
Bottom line is CCBill could give a fuck less about whos content is whos as long as they make some cash!:2 cents:

esnem 09-06-2007 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13047520)
They already did address the issue,and it was clear in the statement made in fewer words that "They would be more than happy to not do anything about this"!
Bottom line is CCBill could give a fuck less about whos content is whos as long as they make some cash!:2 cents:

Is any of your content being stolen on Red Tube?

Are you a content producer?

baddog 09-06-2007 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esnem (Post 13047950)
Is any of your content being stolen on Red Tube?

Are you a content producer?

Of course not. He is just stirring up shit. It is his M.O.

Ripshit 09-06-2007 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esnem (Post 13047950)
Is any of your content being stolen on Red Tube?

Are you a content producer?

Yes and Yes.

Ripshit 09-06-2007 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13048180)
Of course not. He is just stirring up shit. It is his M.O.

You think I start threads to stir things up well your opinion your entitled ,but remember at least I dont shit where I live:thumbsup

baddog 09-06-2007 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13048536)
Yes and Yes.

You are a content producer? Why am I having trouble accepting that?

Ripshit 09-06-2007 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13048602)
You are a content producer? Why am I having trouble accepting that?

I have no Idea maybe because Im not in your little click of bros?
Try to see past your little world man:1orglaugh

After Shock Media 09-06-2007 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13048536)
Yes and Yes.

Then do what they said and send a DMCA to them.

Whenever I send out my DMCA notices (in proper format) they always go to the site owner, the host, and the billing company and or sponsors on any given page. So far aside from a few hosts CCbill has been the quickest to respond and ensure my content gets removed and or halts their billing. Last time I had to do a repeat DMCA on one site it was not even being billed by ccbill anymore but by one of those smaller rarely used billers.

Ripshit 09-06-2007 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 13048623)
Then do what they said and send a DMCA to them.

Whenever I send out my DMCA notices (in proper format) they always go to the site owner, the host, and the billing company and or sponsors on any given page. So far aside from a few hosts CCbill has been the quickest to respond and ensure my content gets removed and or halts their billing. Last time I had to do a repeat DMCA on one site it was not even being billed by ccbill anymore but by one of those smaller rarely used billers.

I have done that already,and this may have solved my problem but I think it certainly does not solve the issue of companies like CCBill not caring until someone bitches about it!
This is the problem they should care from th get go not after the fact!

sextoyking 09-06-2007 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13048673)
I have done that already,and this may have solved my problem but I think it certainly does not solve the issue of companies like CCBill not caring until someone bitches about it!
This is the problem they should care from th get go not after the fact!

Oh Jesus - get a grip please.

You were told how to respond to this - I am sure after you respond - they will take appr. action.

It's like a large ISP (hosting) - they can't monitor tens of thousands of sites they host all the time. They post there policies and if someone violates there policies and or someone complains they will take action. CCbill can check a site at first - but who's to say that site admin / owner doesn't change stuff / content later on.

Give them a break. They have been around for yrs and yrs and run a good solid company. I don't process with them but know Ron and some others from there.

CCbill and Epoch have kept our industry living pretty much over the years, in the good times and the bad times.....

Content Theft SUCKS! - but give a company a chance to rectify the situation.

Peace

Todd

pocketkangaroo 09-06-2007 02:10 PM

I thought this thread was going to involve them in the conspiracy of 9/11.

JMM 09-06-2007 02:22 PM

Let me see if I can clearly explain why a company like CCBill cannot act until they are notified.

The DMCA provides service providers a safe harbor from liability IF they act expeditiously when notified of infringement (A DMCA letter).

Failure to act when properly notifed exposes a company like CCBill to the same liability as the direct infringer.

Now, here is the problem:

CCBill processes for tens of thousands of sites, some of which I am certain deal in stolen content.

If CCBill were to cease processing on sites that they THINK, or BELIEVE are dealing in stolen content WITHOUT being notified by the rights holder, they would then assume the liability for ALL sites that they process for.

So in otherwords, site A, B, and C are all dealing in stolen content. CCBill, acting on a hunch, or a belief, cancels processing for sites A and B (without ever receiving a DMCA notice from the rights holder of the content).

They miss site C, also dealing in stolen content, and continue processing.

They have now assumed the liability for the infringing activity of site C.

The argument would be made, hey..you nixed A and B, but you continued to process for C. You believed that A and B were dealing in stolen content, well you should have believed site C was also.

Pay up.

That is why the DMCA notice was provided for in the DMCA. That is why companies like CCBill, eBay, etc CANNOT act in advance without proper notification, but MUST and do act upon proper notification.

It is all about liability.

Hope that clears things up.

Ripshit 09-06-2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 13048819)
Let me see if I can clearly explain why a company like CCBill cannot act until they are notified.

The DMCA provides service providers a safe harbor from liability IF they act expeditiously when notified of infringement (A DMCA letter).

Failure to act when properly notifed exposes a company like CCBill to the same liability as the direct infringer.

Now, here is the problem:

CCBill processes for tens of thousands of sites, some of which I am certain deal in stolen content.

If CCBill were to cease processing on sites that they THINK, or BELIEVE are dealing in stolen content WITHOUT being notified by the rights holder, they would then assume the liability for ALL sites that they process for.

So in otherwords, site A, B, and C are all dealing in stolen content. CCBill, acting on a hunch, or a belief, cancels processing for sites A and B (without ever receiving a DMCA notice from the rights holder of the content).

They miss site C, also dealing in stolen content, and continue processing.

They have now assumed the liability for the infringing activity of site C.

The argument would be made, hey..you nixed A and B, but you continued to process for C. You believed that A and B were dealing in stolen content, well you should have believed site C was also.

Pay up.

That is why the DMCA notice was provided for in the DMCA. That is why companies like CCBill, eBay, etc CANNOT act in advance without proper notification, but MUST and do act upon proper notification.

It is all about liability.

Hope that clears things up.

So basically your saying that they are incompetent in their lil CCBill business ,and dont give a fuck till someone bitches which is what I am trying to clearly point out here over and over to you people!

I understand their policy,and Corvette clearly stated that his team is
incompetent,and basically they dont give a fuck.:thumbsup

Thanks for summing it all up for us:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Ripshit 09-06-2007 03:00 PM

Hey Ass kissers of CCBill:321GFY

JMM 09-06-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13049084)
So basically your saying that they are incompetent in their lil CCBill business ,and dont give a fuck till someone bitches which is what I am trying to clearly point out here over and over to you people!

I understand their policy,and Corvette clearly stated that his team is
incompetent,and basically they dont give a fuck.:thumbsup

Thanks for summing it all up for us:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

No, that isn't what I said. Did you even read what I wrote or are you just hear to bash ccbill?

Brad Mitchell 09-06-2007 03:22 PM

This industry should thank god every day CCBill and Epoch are open for business, really.

This is just another board troll who doesn't want to stop and listen to business logic and business reality. He's got it out for CCBill no different than SwampThing had it out for me a month ago. He can keep posting but the more he posts the less credibility he has, not that he started with any to begin with.

There is a process in place for complaints and if you're not going to slow down and identify yourself and report complaints properly as you have been invited to then just simply shut the fuck up.

OR, if you really want to address the issue spend about 10 more minutes googling things and point out the same scenario and examples for every other processor out there and then just go on a you hate the world campaign and tell us how every third party processor is out there to fuck the webmaster.

And give me a break on Verotel, I'd echo ModF's comment that they used to do a bang up job processing for all the dog, pig, cow, horse and snake fucking long after every American 3rd party processor stopped.


Brad

Ripshit 09-06-2007 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell (Post 13049248)
This industry should thank god every day CCBill and Epoch are open for business, really.

This is just another board troll who doesn't want to stop and listen to business logic and business reality. He's got it out for CCBill

Wrong I do not have it out for CCBill at all they stated clearley once again that the dont give a fuck until someone bitches!

Case and point!!!!

MeganS 09-06-2007 04:08 PM

http://www.redtube.com/367

I know for sure this is new sensations stuff and they DO NOT license.
Nor do they give 12 minutes clips for promo reasons .. especially not watermarked =)

xoxo,
Megan

MeganS 09-06-2007 04:12 PM

Ohh and naughty america dos not give out 25 minute scenes i am sure ...

http://www.redtube.com/343

xoxo,
Megan

Ripshit 09-06-2007 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWorldMegan (Post 13049448)
http://www.redtube.com/367

I know for sure this is new sensations stuff and they DO NOT license.
Nor do they give 12 minutes clips for promo reasons .. especially not watermarked =)

xoxo,
Megan

Of course it is and at least all of the shit up on that site is ripped off but who cares?

Certainly no one anymore its all about the bros now and it seems they are all living out of each others pockets now:thumbsup

Hey maybe they will buy them a Camera!!!!:1orglaugh

Varius 09-06-2007 04:39 PM

Professional companies like CCBill don't just terminate clients on assumptions. They have contracts and such, you know. What would a client think i they got shut off wrongly because someone didn't know they license content legally (not saying that's the case with redtube as it's obviously not).

Mark clearly stated what you have to send to them, it's not much. Simply send it in (or have the content's owner do it) and get the site terminated in a prompt and professional manner.

Right now, you are bitching for the sake of bitching IMO :2 cents:

halfpint 09-06-2007 04:43 PM

Why dont you talk to A1R3K about this Ripshit as you are a content producer, Then maybe you can sort this all out

PainThing 09-06-2007 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due (Post 13044354)
Actually a billing provider is not requirred to check your licenses to see your content is licensed, but they are requirred to revoke your billing option if actions is not followed from a DMCA notice. They are however if they are based in USA, requirred to check that there is valid 2257 links on sites they do billing for, again a valid 2257 link does not actually mean that you hold the license for the content. If y3ou steal content, why not steal 2257 docs too?
Unlicensed content does not actually mean stolen content, it could be a human mistake, just as a DMCA could also be send out by a mistake as well.
An example could be someone working with a portfolio of companies for different business areas, and by mistake take content licensed to company A and use for combany B, ofcourse this is not licensed, but this could be a honest mistake by the business manager that run both company A and company B.
Would you feel good if I spend example $10K on content in your shop buying content for a company, and by a mistake put up lets say 2 sets on a site owned by another company I run, the result could be you DMCA ccbill that pull billing, after that you discover I bought a shitload of content from you, and you killed one of my online business rather getting me a "warning" to clean up my shit. And in case the above scenario happend, do you think you would have a repeat customer from me?
I'm not saying that this is something I speculate in, but I do hold a lot of licenses for various content, and also content licensed to different companies, so it COULD in theory happend, I do belive I have multiple of your sets too :thumbsup


excellent , thought out reply...guess you been put in that position too huh..
-:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Feels like shit when you pay a guy
$k`S FOR CONTENT AND A YEAR LATER You Get --- I`ll see you in court routine.

Rochard 09-06-2007 05:24 PM

Great - So the rules of the industry have changed.

All programs, credit card processig companies, hosting companies, design companies, and pretty much everyone in the business must verify that all and any content another company they do business with has the legal rights to use said content.

The industry would grind to a halt in seconds.

This is a bullshit thread.

Ripshit 09-07-2007 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 13049948)
Great - So the rules of the industry have changed.

All programs, credit card processig companies, hosting companies, design companies, and pretty much everyone in the business must verify that all and any content another company they do business with has the legal rights to use said content.

The industry would grind to a halt in seconds.

This is a bullshit thread.

Think about what you have just stated in lesser words for a sec......

The industry is out of control,and corrupt!

Sad to say your right seems people have enough problems getting the proper 2257 docs why would I think that there is an once of honesty anywhere in this industry?

Which brings me to another point here where is any of the thousands of 2257 links to on that fuckin site for any of the content?

OG LennyT 09-07-2007 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 13049948)
This is a bullshit thread.

exactly.

Ripshitter sounds like a fucking 13 yr old kid

xxxice 09-07-2007 11:13 AM

Bump ...

2012 09-07-2007 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OG LennyT (Post 13051770)
exactly.

Ripshitter sounds like a fucking 13 yr old kid

its fucking horse shit man !

Marshal 09-07-2007 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanker (Post 13042566)
depends on what redtube.com was when they signed up for processing

check this out:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.redtube.com

someone could find this very interesting!

Huggles 09-07-2007 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by corvette (Post 13043096)
ripshit, if your content is on there without your permission, icq me and together we will get it off or the site down and if this is anything other than a one time occurrence, that client will be shut off and will never processing with ccbill again. Just need to be sure that there is content on the site that they dont have permission to use. Ill hold your hand through the entire process.

45471840



THAT ENTIRE FUCKING SITE IS BASICALLY ALL FUCKING STOLEN FUCKING CONTENT!

Huggles 09-07-2007 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 13049948)
Great - So the rules of the industry have changed.

All programs, credit card processig companies, hosting companies, design companies, and pretty much everyone in the business must verify that all and any content another company they do business with has the legal rights to use said content.

The industry would grind to a halt in seconds.

This is a bullshit thread.



I am going to download a TON of Cherry pimps content and seed it on torrents right now.


You can't stop me.

Huggles 09-07-2007 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13048180)
Of course not. He is just stirring up shit. It is his M.O.


Hehe, I'm thinking of opening a tube site, downloading a TON of sponsor content full episodes, and then charging 10/month for access to it.


Would the ONLY people to have the "right" to complain about the theft be the content rights owners?


If at the movie post dinner, if I had walked to your table and stolen your digital camera, would only you have the right to say that's wrong?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc