GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   U.S. War with Iran moves closer... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=768175)

Ripshit 09-13-2007 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082876)
please dude, you're a fucking retard. go start another 9/11 thread.

Hey man tell your mom I want my underwear back from your sister ok?:1orglaugh

mistergardener 09-13-2007 02:03 PM

This is just sooooo overrated.

just a punk 09-13-2007 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082869)
not really relevant to the situation at hand. What's the logic? the US dropped 'the bomb' so they should say "aw gee shucks I guess someone else should get to use one too to make it fair"
lol

You didn't get it. Noone have to say anything after that. The USA already "said" it all in 1945. Now everyone on this planet knows where is the real monkey with a grenade.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13082886)
Hey man tell your mom I want my underwear back from your sister ok?:1orglaugh

oh wow, a mom / sister joke combo.

ya well my dad could beat up your dad... idiot.

Paul 09-13-2007 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082780)
Russia and China will make lotsa noise and issue lots of political condemnations.. blah blah blah, but they won't do fuck all as usual. The arab countries don't give a fuck since Iranians are persians anyway. Special interest groups like al qaeda, hamas and hezbollah will cause shit with Israel as expected.. and get lotsa mileage out of it. And the political left in the US will have more ammo to use against the republicans.

Hmm I could see Russia and China doing a lot more than making noise about a war with Iran, they both have a lot of money tied up in Iranian oil. If there was a war I could see China and Russia providing weapons to Iran (If they have not done so already)

If America do go to war with Iran (and win) then in total that will be around 25% of the worlds oil secured in a rather short space of time.

Ripshit 09-13-2007 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082908)
oh wow, a mom / sister joke combo.

ya well my dad could beat up your dad... idiot.

Im sure mine was only a green beret ,and brought me home pet Cobras from south Veitnam for pets.....
Its cool:)

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 13082900)
You didn't get Noone have to say anything after that. The USA already "said" it all in 1945. Now everyone on this planet knows where is the real monkey with a grenade.

The US is in an unenviable position, on one hand it's always "who do the US think they are, the world police??" and on the other hand as soon as anyone needs some bombs dropped, who do they going crying to??

I don't have a partisan position in US politics, so I don't give a shit about democrat this or republican that.. I do have some understanding of game theory and international relations.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13082915)
Hmm I could see Russia and China doing a lot more than making noise about a war with Iran, they both have a lot of money tied up in Iranian oil. If there was a war I could see China and Russia providing weapons to Iran (If they have not done so already)

If America do go to war with Iran (and win) then in total that will be around 25% of the worlds oil secured in a rather short space of time.

The people who actually make the plans for these things are thorough in their investigations. For example, the situation in Iraq was not unforseen by someone, but the powers that be made their decision anyway - and ol' georgy boy is paying a price.

In the same way, all possible outcomes will be researched exhaustively, and one of the scenarios will be a worst case scenario where russie and china go all ape shit and do something stupid.

There is risk inherent in any decision. What is most dangerous is the short timelines that politicians deal with, they over-weight the short term and under-weight the long term consequences since their 'lives' are short. The world would be better off if economists made decisions.. and besides, economists do it with models.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13082918)
Im sure mine was only a green beret ,and brought me home pet Cobras from south Veitnam for pets.....
Its cool:)

Oh, so your psychopathic tendencies are genetic. makes sense now.

buzzy 09-13-2007 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 13082307)
Iran has had it coming since 1979.

It won't be pretty. We are going to hit them extremely hard.

Thank goodness GWB will stop Iran before they can launch their promised Armageddon on the US, Israel, or another country.

You have to be one of the most retarded people on these forums, you know it's ignorant fools like you who end up making the war happen, 30% support for the war is more than enough in Bushes book and im pretty sure there are more than 30% retards in america.

Iran hasn't done anything to you, they aren't building a bomb they want nuclear energy because it's cost effective and friendly compared to other methods. They aren't supporting the taliban or al qaeuda or w/e in iraq, they are enemies for fuck sake the taliban and al qaeda pledged to blow up mosques in Iran.

So there are your reasons for attacking iran blown out the water, what are you going to do now big nose? say they want to blow israel up? lets face it the world will be a better place without israel and america, oh and without retards like you.

Paul 09-13-2007 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082941)
The people who actually make the plans for these things are thorough in their investigations. For example, the situation in Iraq was not unforseen by someone, but the powers that be made their decision anyway - and ol' georgy boy is paying a price.

In the same way, all possible outcomes will be researched exhaustively, and one of the scenarios will be a worst case scenario where russie and china go all ape shit and do something stupid.

There is risk inherent in any decision. What is most dangerous is the short timelines that politicians deal with, they over-weight the short term and under-weight the long term consequences since their 'lives' are short. The world would be better off if economists made decisions.. and besides, economists do it with models.

Worst case scenario being World War 3, I very much doubt that would happen (China and Russia getting fully involved) Russia have plenty of their own oil, so I suppose China would be more upset of the two considering that they need incredible amounts of energy and have massive oil deals with Iran.

Now will they be upset enough at losing 100's of billions of dollars to confront America, nah I don't see it . That would seem a rather foolish move at this point in time.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13082974)
You have to be one of the most retarded people on these forums, you know it's ignorant fools like you who end up making the war happen, 30% support for the war is more than enough in Bushes book and im pretty sure there are more than 30% retards in america.

Iran hasn't done anything to you, they aren't building a bomb they want nuclear energy because it's cost effective and friendly compared to other methods. They aren't supporting the taliban or al qaeuda or w/e in iraq, they are enemies for fuck sake the taliban and al qaeda pledged to blow up mosques in Iran.

So there are your reasons for attacking iran blown out the water, what are you going to do now big nose? say they want to blow israel up? lets face it the world will be a better place without israel and america, oh and without retards like you.

bullshit. If they wanted nuclear power they could get it just like anyone else - they kick out IAEA inspectors and refuse to cooperate with the UN. They fund and support Hezbollah.

The iranian people don't deserve to suffer under such a regime - Iran is a progressive, moderate society at heart.

Ripshit 09-13-2007 02:28 PM

Yeah you little CUNT!!!!!!!!!!:1orglaugh

buzzy 09-13-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082992)
bullshit. If they wanted nuclear power they could get it just like anyone else - they kick out IAEA inspectors and refuse to cooperate with the UN. They fund and support Hezbollah.

The iranian people don't deserve to suffer under such a regime - Iran is a progressive, moderate society at heart.

WOW another retard. There nuclear program is well within international law and they have invited IAEA inspectors fucktard, and of course they fund and support hezbollah, i mean if i was rich i'd fund such a great political party who are doing their upmost to restore the lebonese peoples dignity and rights.

Paul 09-13-2007 02:30 PM

Question is, what is the US tactic going to be if they go into Iran.

Same as Iraq perhaps? Bomb the military infrastructure to pieces, secure the oil fields around massive US military bases and then start a sectarian war between the people and let them kill each other leaving the place in chaos.

Worked well in Iraq!

directfiesta 09-13-2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082992)
bullshit. If they wanted nuclear power they could get it just like anyone else - they kick out IAEA inspectors and refuse to cooperate with the UN. They fund and support Hezbollah.

The iranian people don't deserve to suffer under such a regime - Iran is a progressive, moderate society at heart.

shit you are confused ...

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083007)
WOW another retard. There nuclear program is well within international law and they have invited IAEA inspectors fucktard, and of course they fund and support hezbollah, i mean if i was rich i'd fund such a great political party who are doing their upmost to restore the lebonese peoples dignity and rights.

WOW another radical left-wing arm-chair activist.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 13083027)
shit you are confused ...

enlighten me.

buzzy 09-13-2007 02:36 PM

nice response as usual the retard cant provide a counter argument. big nose.

Ripshit 09-13-2007 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13083018)
Question is, what is the US tactic going to be if they go into Iran.

Same as Iraq perhaps? Bomb the military infrastructure to pieces, secure the oil fields around massive US military bases and then start a sectarian war between the people and let them kill each other leaving the place in chaos.

Worked well in Iraq!

You have no idea do you?
Well I think thats sad:(

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13083018)
Question is, what is the US tactic going to be if they go into Iran.

Same as Iraq perhaps? Bomb the military infrastructure to pieces, secure the oil fields around massive US military bases and then start a sectarian war between the people and let them kill each other leaving the place in chaos.

Worked well in Iraq!

I doubt there would be any troop involvement beyond special forces units for target acquisition. The goal is not to invade and overthrow, but a tactical mission to disrupt their nuclear program.

buzzy 09-13-2007 02:38 PM

they are well within international law and have right to nuclear energy, do they not?

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083056)
nice response as usual the retard cant provide a counter argument. big nose.

Read what the IAEA has to say about Iran and it's program. Iran's invitations are tokens only and strictly controlled. Go, get on your google horse.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083070)
they are well within international law and have right to nuclear energy, do they not?

They gotta play by the rules. and guess what, when you don't have the airplanes and the bombs to back it up, you don't get to make your own rules, that's reality.

Paul 09-13-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ripshit (Post 13083058)
You have no idea do you?
Well I think thats sad:(

What are you talking about?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13083060)
I doubt there would be any troop involvement beyond special forces units for target acquisition. The goal is not to invade and overthrow, but a tactical mission to disrupt their nuclear program.

Oh yes of coarse! Much like the "Official" goal in Iraq was to find the WMDs and give the Iraqi people democracy :winkwink:

buzzy 09-13-2007 02:40 PM

to be honest, theres no point arguing with you because like all nationalists talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.

at the end of the day if the usa even takes one step over the border they have 200k vunerable troops in iraq that iran will squash, and i hope they do.

StuartD 09-13-2007 02:46 PM

I think some of you REALLY need to read this.... and understand just how badly the US has screwed things up in the middle east for a LONG TIME now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ajax

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083090)
to be honest, theres no point arguing with you because like all nationalists talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.

at the end of the day if the usa even takes one step over the border they have 200k vunerable troops in iraq that iran will squash, and i hope they do.

meh, im raring to go. I am actually a realist when it comes to international relations. I subscribe to the theory of the state as a rational actor (basically game theory for international relations). If you can't handle a discussion on that level, then fine. Where did you come up with me being a nationalist?? :1orglaugh

Blazed 09-13-2007 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083090)
to be honest, theres no point arguing with you because like all nationalists talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.

at the end of the day if the usa even takes one step over the border they have 200k vunerable troops in iraq that iran will squash, and i hope they do.

God knows i love some yank hating as much as the next guy but what a fucking dick you must be to support Iranian troops over American. Americans are our allies and without them we would be in shit, especially with the current tensions. You weird conspiracy mother fuckers spend to much time locked up in your bedrooms.

just a punk 09-13-2007 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13082941)
In the same way, all possible outcomes will be researched exhaustively, and one of the scenarios will be a worst case scenario where russie and china go all ape shit and do something stupid.

You said "go all ape shit and do something stupid"? Seems the only country on Earth is doing just genius things only (guess which country I'm talking about? :)) So anything those other countries (China and Russia - for some "unknown" reason you wrote these words in lowercase) doing against it is stupid by default. Ok, I got your point.

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 13083155)
You said "go all ape shit and do something stupid"? Seems the only country on Earth is doing just genius things only (guess which country I'm talking about? :)) So anything those other countries (China and Russia - for some "unknown" reason you wrote these words in lowercase) doing against it is stupid by default. Ok, I got your point.

Im not american and don't give a flying fuck about US domestic politics. So if you're suggesting my opinion is skewed by either democratic or republican propaganda, you are incorrect :)

just a punk 09-13-2007 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13082986)
Worst case scenario being World War 3, I very much doubt that would happen (China and Russia getting fully involved) Russia have plenty of their own oil, so I suppose China would be more upset of the two considering that they need incredible amounts of energy and have massive oil deals with Iran.

Actually that's not really correct. Russia has it's own oil and theoretically it's interested in war between the USA and Iran because the prices on oil will be raised as never before. :2 cents:

Profits of Doom 09-13-2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13083090)
to be honest, theres no point arguing with you because like all nationalists talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.

at the end of the day if the usa even takes one step over the border they have 200k vunerable troops in iraq that iran will squash, and i hope they do.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, becasue Iran has shown it's superior military acumen in past wars, like the Iran/Iraq war. Bang up job they did there. That war was the equivalent of giving two retarded kids baseball bats and telling them to duke it out. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

just a punk 09-13-2007 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13083165)
Im not american and don't give a flying fuck about US domestic politics. So if you're suggesting my opinion is skewed by either democratic or republican propaganda, you are incorrect :)

You don't have to be an American to be a subject of the US propaganda :2 cents:

KRosh 09-13-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13078748)
Iran and Iraq sure have more in common than the US does with any country in that region.

A major portion of the Iraqi population have their heritage/culture from Iran and no doubts both these countries will ally in the future - whether others like it or not - it has nothing to do with anyone else.

I normally NEVER get involved in these threads but this one put me over the top.

HAHAH where do you get your facts? is it because the names are so close?

Iran = non Arab Nation - Iraq = Arab Nation tell me how they share the same heritage and culture? - Did you forget that Iran and Iraq had a war against each other?

Please do not mix in political discussions if you do not have your facts straight

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 13083227)
You don't have to be an American to be a subject of the US propaganda :2 cents:

There does exist intelligent and educated free thinkers able to analyze without bias and formulate opinion based on that analysis :2 cents:

directfiesta 09-13-2007 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Profits of Doom (Post 13083194)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah, becasue Iran has shown it's superior military acumen in past wars, like the Iran/Iraq war. Bang up job they did there. That war was the equivalent of giving two retarded kids baseball bats and telling them to duke it out. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Your opinion is of no consequence or interest .... run away .... again.


Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 13043194)
Iranians are not ARABS :2 cents:


Quote:

Originally Posted by Profits of Doom (Post 13043441)
Uh, yes they are, genius...

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 13045337)
if you say , it must be true.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Calling an Iranian an Arab, is like calling a Irish .. an English....

:2 cents:



Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 13043194)
Overview

The CIA World Factbook estimates that approximately 3% of Iran's 68,017,860 citizens are Arabic-speakers, of whom the majority live in Khuzestan, with 1% speaking Arabic as their native or primary language.[1]

A 1998 report by UNCHR reported 2 million Arabs residing in Khuzestan Province, most of whom are Shi'a. Sunni Muslim Arabs live along the Persian Gulf coastline. [2]

According to Jane's Information Group, "Most Iranian Arabs seek their constitutionally guaranteed rights and do not have a separatist agenda ... While it may be true that some Arab activists are separatists, most see themselves as Iranians first and declare their commitment to the state's territorial integrity." [3]

According to the Minorities at Risk Project 2001, about 40 per cent of Arabs are unskilled workers living in urban areas. The Arabs in the rural areas are primarily farmers and fishermen. The Arabs living along the Persian Gulf coastal plains are mostly pastoral nomads. Tribal loyalties are strong among rural Arabs, but also have an influence in urban areas. These have an impact on Arab socialisation and politicisation. [4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabs_of_Khuzestan


http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newrep...ply&p=13043441

just a punk 09-13-2007 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRosh (Post 13083231)
Iran = non Arab Nation - Iraq = Arab Nation tell me how they share the same heritage and culture? - Did you forget that Iran and Iraq had a war against each other?

I bet he gets all the knowledge from TV. Persians are the same as Arabs (they have a same culture etc), Iran is just a different spelling of Iraq, the US army gained over Berlin in 1945 and so on... :winkwink:

Paul 09-13-2007 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 13083185)
Actually that's not really correct. Russia has it's own oil and theoretically it's interested in war between the USA and Iran because the prices on oil will be raised as never before. :2 cents:

That's a very good point

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13083140)
Where did you come up with me being a nationalist?? :1orglaugh

If I'm not mistaken that jibe was aimed at me. Northern Ireland, Nationalists and Loyalists. Anyway it was a retarded assumption to make because I am neither, I just want some freakin peace for my wee country!

Dollarmansteve 09-13-2007 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coatsy (Post 13083310)
If I'm not mistaken that jibe was aimed at me. Northern Ireland, Nationalists and Loyalists. Anyway it was a retarded assumption to make because I am neither, I just want some freakin peace for my wee country!


ahh.. gotcha.. my bad.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123