Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13318700)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Things you make up on the spot don't count as fact.:error

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13318814)

So, you are now claiming or suggesting that the CEO of Blackwater 'testified' to idiots that his employees fall under the UCMJ????? Sorry - try another excuse :1orglaugh

Do you realise how pathetic and irrelvant your "congressional hearings" are??? They do not matter to anyone other than dumbasses. Your domestic govt game-playing has no relevance to anyone else or Iraq.

You are talking about a corrupt regime pandering a face of "democracy" and other fine virtues in an attempt to be "respectable" while being totally useless to those who elected them. The same idiots elected to invade Iraq in the first place - tho they had no clue and still don't.

Any testimony by a Blackwater CEO is not even worth a dime and would never stand up in any court other than as secondary support evidence (if he could even provide that secondary evidence). It's a farce for public consumption from the best democracy money can buy - nothing more.

Seriously - as a group, never seen a more incompetent load of wankers ever. If they were on the board of a corp - they'd drive it into the ground and financial oblivion. Unfortunately, that is an area they are having some success on.

You are correct re Iraqi law - the sooner this is enabled and retrospectively implemented, the better. By that time, unless by magic, they are arrested and detained, - they will never set foot in Iraq territory again. Little compensation for families of those murdered to know, as in the child rape and murders, they will never have any justice served in the US.

Originally Posted by theking (Post 13318836)

Blah...blah...blah...pigshit.

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13318859)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That is exactly the response which occurs every time it becomes harder to find an excuse for - ie "we just run out of excuses to defend" the indefensible. So very predictable :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by theking (Post 13318827)

If you choose to remain ignorant of factual events that is your choice to make...sport. You are now dismissed.

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13318859)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That is exactly the response which occurs every time it becomes harder to find an excuse for - ie "we just run out of excuses to defend" the indefensible. So very predictable :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by theking (Post 13318958)

I do not feel a need to defend against pure blowhard misinformation/pigshit...thank you very much.

Originally Posted by Xplicit (Post 13313716)

BTW, the additude of the Bush lovers seems to be...

"The government wouldn't try something that crazy."

CORRECTION: You mean the government wouldn't try something that crazy....again.



You guys are such pathetic suckers. Keep voting for your Hillary's, Bush's and Guliani's.

Originally Posted by Kevsh (Post 13315272)

Here we go ....

Okay, simple question for the conspiracy believers: Where's your smoking gun?

The one thing you all have in common is great skill in showing inconsistencies, oddities and it-couldn't-happen-like-that theories but where is ANY proof of ANY individual responsible in the planning, coordinating, implementing what no one can doubt would have been an almost impossibly difficult plan, involving hundreds of people, to carry out and cover up?

Name one person. Just one ... Oh, and please provide some credible evidence to substantiate your claim(s).

Originally Posted by GreyWolf (Post 13318547)

Pandering to a dumbass was always a total waste of time buzzy. There is no reason to believe this is not a dumbass and a purveyor of fantasy :thumbsup

But.. for entertainment value... that's another story :pimp Make a post which says "milk comes from cows" and you are sure to get "proof?", "goats produce milk" and of course, "pigshit" - which does not come from cows *lol*

But even that can get boring....

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 13412754)

This is the problem with them... When you bring up something like this, they don't answer it. They just spew more ridiculous speculation.

It's not that the government wouldn't do it. I might be able to believe that they would. It's just that they COULDN'T. While the conspiracy theorist spew their silly ass ideas, spurred on by raging liberalism, they never really explain how such a massive plan could be carried out by so many people with no whistle blower.

they are idiots but they don't realize it.

Originally Posted by Profits of Doom (Post 13412788)

If our government was smart enough to pull off 9/11 they would have also been smart enough to plant WMD's in Iraq, plain and simple. I can't imagine them being able to pull off a huge global conspiracy like 9/11, and then not being able to plant a few WMD's in Iraq to justify us being there, which would have been pretty simple by comparison...

Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 13413552)

Why was Mohammad Atta wired huge sum of money from Pakistan intelligence shortly after Paki intel met with CIA?

Huge coincidence that Marvin Bush is on the board of the security firms of Dulles International, WTC and the flight instruction firm that trained Atta.

Strange that Osama met with CIA ops while in a US hospital in Dubai days before the attacks.

Peculiar that anything connected with the oil pipeline from Uzbekistan through the mideast has Halliburton, Carlysle Corp, Bush, Cheney & bin Laden all connected.

Peculiar that US was in negotiations in late 90s with Taliban to plan the pipeline through Afghanistan, they declined proposal..

Several other occurances that make you go Hmm...


By the way, GW is a puppet, not the mastermind.