GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   G.W. Bush the terrorist is at it again..... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=789469)

xmas13 12-04-2007 01:33 PM

http://www.kingofbombs.com/pictures/...-explosion.jpg

GreyWolf 12-04-2007 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13469988)
Iran is happy with the report because it means they have backed off from beating the wardrums. They never were building bombs.

Seriously buzzy - they all lie. Iran lies, the US lies ad nausea... and, in the end - Iran will have nuclear capability along with any other countries who are threatened. Sadly - it makes sense, but sure not helpful.

Iran was messed with for decades by the US and then dumbo George opened his stupid mouth and threatened with his unoriginal "axis of evil" term. What did the "axis of evil" do? Arm themselves. Of course they are going to take whatever steps needed to have whatever weaponary as defense against predatory activity.

It'a a foul arguement that one kid on the block is entitled to have arms and others should not. None of them can be trusted with shit, whether they currently have nuclear capability or not.

Add to that, the hypocracy being displayed is a sad joke. The US has no problems with eg Pakistan or Egypt having nukes. At the same time Iran has nuclear neighbors - what are they expected to do??

Then there are the "agendas" - the only reason the US govt is in the Middle East relates to oil. Of course they don't want Iran to have more powerful weapons - they have tried to decades to control oil (tho it does not belong to them) and failed. The concept of Iran having nuclear capability places hopes of oil control even further away.

Awesome how school kids behave in the playground :winkwink:

xmas13 12-04-2007 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13470090)
Yes, it welcomes a new report because they are no longer beating the war drums. I don't in any way see how that is admitting to building nukes.

Also, no I'm not a "paki" or an arab, but it's nice to admit that you are a racist, losing all your credibility. How old are you, 14?

I'm not a racist, i'm a Daily Telegraph reader, and Iranians don't have a nuclear weapons program, they just need electricity. :1orglaugh

Please........... :1orglaugh

Ok so you are not paki, not camel, not a whore from iran.

Are you a fag, a communist, a tard, do you eat bananas?

Just asking, no offense. :)

buzzy 12-04-2007 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 13470133)
I'm not a racist, i'm a Daily Telegraph reader, and Iranians don't have a nuclear weapons program, they just need electricity. :1orglaugh

Please........... :1orglaugh

Ok so you are not paki, not camel, not a whore from iran.

Are you a fag, a communist, a tard, do you eat bananas?

Just asking, no offense. :)

A daily telegraph reader, that explains it.

But anyway, i have provided a legitamate argument prooving that your argument is illogical and all you can do is return racist insults and flames, i think we know who is right :)

$hemale$ 12-04-2007 01:42 PM

.


This thread is truly disturbing... I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

...some of the replies here are insane... why is it that so many americans treat politics like it's some kind of religion?

What you believe about your government or president or republican party or whatever is completely meaningless... how about looking at the facts???

Some of you should really try reading a few books or watching a documentary or two some time rather than just being pigheaded ignorant assholes all the time...

:2 cents:


.

xmas13 12-04-2007 01:46 PM

Fuck Bush, Fuck Ahmadinejad.

The tard and the fag, would make a beautiful couple. They might not produce nukes but they are producing tard babies in the US and Iran.

http://www.geetan.com/images/content/bush_monkey.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/67/21...50f81942_m.jpg

directfiesta 12-04-2007 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 13470074)
So who are you? A paki, a camel or a whore from Iran?

nice ....

gives you much credibility ..... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

directfiesta 12-04-2007 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 13470089)
This new US intelligence report still claims that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, and implies that Iranians are liars, and Iran welcomes this new report?

Strange reaction.

LOL.

http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/spin.jpg

bronco67 12-04-2007 03:25 PM

So it sounds like many of you in this thread don't mind the idea of an Islamist country with a crackpot leader having Nuclear energy/weapons or whatever.

As far as you're concerned, there is no threat to our security. You should be glad we keep nukes out of the hands of governments who hate the West, and probably wouldn't hesitate to give access to fundamentalist crazy enough to set off the big one on our soil.

You can keep telling yourself there is no threat to America, but you are lying to yourselves.

directfiesta 12-04-2007 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 13470683)

As far as you're concerned, there is no threat to our security. You should be glad we keep nukes out of the hands of governments who hate the West, and probably wouldn't hesitate to give access to fundamentalist crazy enough to set off the big one on our soil.

You are either stupid or ignorant ....

Quote:

Bush handed blueprint to seize Pakistan's nuclear arsenal

The man who devised the Bush administration's Iraq troop surge has urged the US to consider sending elite troops to Pakistan to seize its nuclear weapons if the country descends into chaos.

In a series of scenarios drawn up for Pakistan, Frederick Kagan, a former West Point military historian, has called for the White House to consider various options for an unstable Pakistan.

These include: sending elite British or US troops to secure nuclear weapons capable of being transported out of the country and take them to a secret storage depot in New Mexico or a "remote redoubt" inside Pakistan; sending US troops to Pakistan's north-western border to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida; and a US military occupation of the capital Islamabad, and the provinces of Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan if asked for assistance by a fractured Pakistan military, so that the US could shore up President Pervez Musharraf and General Ashfaq Kayani, who became army chief this week.
So. what were you saying .....

Let me see ....

You ( the USA ) keep nukes out of the hands of " people crazy enough to set off the big one on our soil "

It is really sad to see how brainwashed you guys are, even AFTER the Iraq debacle ....

directfiesta 12-04-2007 03:31 PM

Oh... in case you need the link, since it is a standard request for right-wingers :

http://www.guardian.co.uk/pakistan/S...220126,00.html

ShaveBucks 12-04-2007 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13469115)
This thread is ridiculous. You all must have all of the information regarding this whole situation and I'm just the guy talking out of his ass. I know it's the cool thing to dog America these days and I can't fight that, so you guys belief what you want and I'll continue to back the country that has given me an awesome life. I know it's not perfect and it's made decisions that could of been better, but so has every other country in the world.

You're right. We don't have the information. So let's nuke the bastards!!!!


It's amazing you have the brain power to breathe.

bronco67 12-04-2007 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 13470701)
You are either stupid or ignorant ....



So. what were you saying .....

Let me see ....

You ( the USA ) keep nukes out of the hands of " people crazy enough to set off the big one on our soil "

It is really sad to see how brainwashed you guys are, even AFTER the Iraq debacle ....

So there is not islamic terrorism? Oh my god, if I just keep saying it over and over, then it must be true. What country are you from?

aico 12-04-2007 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13469301)
Because I don't agree with you? I would rather be blind and deaf than an simple minded sheep that believes everything I see on tv.

where is it exactly that you got your information about Iraq and Iran from?

Brother Bilo 12-04-2007 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks (Post 13470760)
You're right. We don't have the information. So let's nuke the bastards!!!!


It's amazing you have the brain power to breathe.

Why do you say that? In any of the posts in this or any other thread have you seen me say that we should nuke them?

It cracks me up that because my opinion on this subject is different from most of yours, that somehow makes me stupid. As with most contreversial topics on this board, everyones opinion seems to be fact and anyone who has an opinion that differs is now somehow labeled as having too little brain power to breathe.

Please explain to me why I am so stupid.

ShaveBucks 12-04-2007 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13468752)
Ya, I'm sure Iraq and Iran were both just minding their business with no intent of ever causing problems for the world and the US just kicked in the door for now reason what so ever.

Douchebag.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13470780)
Why do you say that? In any of the posts in this or any other thread have you seen me say that we should nuke them?

It cracks me up that because my opinion on this subject is different from most of yours, that somehow makes me stupid. As with most contreversial topics on this board, everyones opinion seems to be fact and anyone who has an opinion that differs is now somehow labeled as having too little brain power to breathe.

Please explain to me why I am so stupid.

You're free to make assumptions about what you are SURE of (even if sarcastic) but we're not, even using information that's been confirmed.

Please go about your business hypocritical retard. It's amusing.

directfiesta 12-04-2007 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 13470762)
So there is not islamic terrorism? Oh my god, if I just keep saying it over and over, then it must be true. What country are you from?

use the approved term : islamo-facist .... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Brother Bilo 12-04-2007 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks (Post 13470795)
You're free to make assumptions about what you are SURE of (even if sarcastic) but we're not, even using information that's been confirmed.

Please go about your business hypocritical retard. It's amusing.

I'm not sure of anything, that's why I'm not making assumptions. This is what I've been saying this entire time. I don't have all of the information and I'm not pretending to have all of the information like many of the people bashing me here. There is so much more going on then what you or I know about.

Go along with the rest of the America/Bush haters, I'm just not one of them. Sorry that seems to upset so many of you. I guess it's a good thing I'm in America where I can believe what I want, but then I guess I'm only allowed to use that argument when everyone agrees with me huh?

ShaveBucks 12-04-2007 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13470828)
I'm not sure of anything, that's why I'm not making assumptions.

But you are making assumptions. You assume that the government is looking out for our best interests. That Bush has information that is accurate. That they are doing the right thing because that's what you want them to do.

You've been TOLD that what they said was false. And yet you refuse to believe it because of your assumptions, not the facts presented.

And that's pretty dumb.

Brother Bilo 12-04-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaveBucks (Post 13470853)
But you are making assumptions. You assume that the government is looking out for our best interests. That Bush has information that is accurate. That they are doing the right thing because that's what you want them to do.

You've been TOLD that what they said was false. And yet you refuse to believe it because of your assumptions, not the facts presented.

And that's pretty dumb.

No, I've been told by people who were in situations much like the one we are currently in that the reports that make the news are mostly false and don't contain nearly half the story. I take what the mainstream media reports with a grain of salt because I know that they all spin stories to further their own agendas. One event can be covered by multiple media agencies and they will all have different info and angles.

What I'm saying is that there is always more to the story then what is reported and to say otherwise is pretty dumb.

uno 12-04-2007 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 13469409)
I'd be comfortable with only nations that don't hold the religious beliefs that to die for your religion is the highest honor one can achieve having nukes. :2 cents:

It's what Jesus did. That seemed to work out well for him. :thumbsup

One hunnet.

ShaveBucks 12-04-2007 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Bilo (Post 13470969)
What I'm saying is that there is always more to the story then what is reported and to say otherwise is pretty dumb.

Yes, Bush said that Iran was making nukes..... there was more to the story. He lied.

I bet when a sponsor shaves you, you just shrug and go "well, they lied but I bet there's more to the story. I don't mind."

Penthouse Tony 12-04-2007 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13470010)
It's quite simple. Irans leader his insisted many times he wants the nuclear energy for electricity. If we go by the absolutley absurd logic by assuming that he is lying, we would have to assume that Bush is also lying about the intel on Iran, and then you are in a paradox...

logic 101

And if we believe him when he says he wants nuclear energy for electricity should we also believe him when he says he wants to wipe an entire country off the face of the world?

Or is it convenient to ignore that part?

buzzy 12-04-2007 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 13471074)
And if we believe him when he says he wants nuclear energy for electricity should we also believe him when he says he wants to wipe an entire country off the face of the world?

Or is it convenient to ignore that part?

Umm, yes we can ignore that part because he didn't fucking say it. It was spin by the media. Loads of professors in the Farsi language have confirmed that it was a mis translation and what he said is that the

"Zionist regieme from Israel should be wiped from the pages of time"

When we wanted to wipe Communism from the pages of time, we didn't want to wipe Russia off the map.

Official translation: The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad) or .بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud...jad_and_Israel

Penthouse Tony 12-04-2007 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13471185)
what he said is that the

"Zionist regieme from Israel should be wiped from the pages of time"

And how is that going to be done? Peacefully? We aren't going to destroy Israel we are just going to destroy the Zionists that make up Israel.



oh and their families.

buzzy 12-04-2007 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 13471232)
And how is that going to be done? Peacefully? We aren't going to destroy Israel we are just going to destroy the Zionists that make up Israel.



oh and their families.

Read it again. It says nothing about destroying anyone or anything. It's not about wiping out people or killing people, it's about terminating a racist ideology that causes death.

Peace = good.

Zionism = racism

Racism = Bad

Penthouse Tony 12-04-2007 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13471236)
Read it again. It says nothing about destroying anyone or anything. It's not about wiping out people or killing people, it's about terminating a racist ideology that causes death.

Peace = good.

Zionism = racism

Racism = Bad

I read it and I'm asking you how will this be done?

BTW the idea that every nation of people can have a home except for one -- the jewish one -- is racist to me.

buzzy 12-04-2007 05:50 PM

Nonononono, nobody said the Jews can't have a home. Infact i'm not even objecting to them having a home in Israel, but the west bank and Gaza must be handed over and Israel must withdraw from there since it isn't there land. Also East Jerusalem must be made the capital of Palestine, then mabye everyone can work towards a multi cutral and peaceful Israel...

Penthouse Tony 12-04-2007 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13471270)
Nonononono, nobody said the Jews can't have a home. Infact i'm not even objecting to them having a home in Israel, but the west bank and Gaza must be handed over and Israel must withdraw from there since it isn't there land. Also East Jerusalem must be made the capital of Palestine, then mabye everyone can work towards a multi cutral and peaceful Israel...

I'm not going to get into it about who's land it is but I agree for the most part in the solution you outlined. Only condition that Israel seems to have is they want peaceful neighbors since this land has been used twice from which to attack from.

directfiesta 12-04-2007 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 13471264)
I read it and I'm asking you how will this be done?

BTW the idea that every nation of people can have a home except for one -- the jewish one -- is racist to me.

Israel is there ... and will stay . No point discussing that.

But since when a religion requires a " country " ???

The Jehovah witness have a country ?
The mormons have a country ?
The christians have a country ?

No... Some countries tough are mainly populated with some majority of religion .... but don't have a country...

I don't.

directfiesta 12-04-2007 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF (Post 13471282)
I'm not going to get into it about who's land it is but I agree for the most part in the solution you outlined. Only condition that Israel seems to have is they want peaceful neighbors since this land has been used twice from which to attack from.

Agree on that ...

The worst that the " Palestinians " are doing for their cause is to attack Israel with blind rockets ... It is an act of terrorism, useless and achieves nothing aside from furthering their own cause.

seeric 12-04-2007 06:06 PM

geees, is this all it takes to get people wound up? calling an idiot an idiot?

fact: GWB is an idiot. it doesn't make you any less patriotic to think that.

i bet he doesn't even tie his own shoes in the morning without help to get it right.

tony286 12-04-2007 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 13469495)
Gee Tony now you sound like OMG....RON PAUL!

I agree with him on that, its the truth.

Vick! 12-04-2007 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GITZINGER (Post 13468572)
Just now a news reporter said "well, you talked of mushroom clouds in Iraq and WMD's, and there were none, then you talked of Iran having nukes or close to it, and now it turns out there are none. Can't you be accused of hyping these less than truthful claims, and ruining the U.S.'s credibility?"

Bush: "uh.......uh......uh.....Iran was and still is dangerous, nothing has changed, my opinion hasn't changed"

Retard ....

GITZINGER 12-04-2007 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 13471660)
Retard ....

Good one!! another intelligent response!!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GITZINGER 12-05-2007 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 13471327)
geees, is this all it takes to get people wound up? calling an idiot an idiot?

fact: GWB is an idiot. it doesn't make you any less patriotic to think that.

i bet he doesn't even tie his own shoes in the morning without help to get it right.

I'll betchur right. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123