| baddog |
01-05-2008 11:29 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by =^..^=
(Post 13610816)
I recently discovered he is against giving citizenship to babies born in the US if their parents are Not citizens.
My new baby was born in California and is a citizen - I am not a citizen I'm long-term resident.
Now IF my baby had not been citizen she would not have got health coverage she did ... 2 weeks ago my baby was rushed to emergency and put on life support for 5 days after her lungs stopped functioning (she's 7 months old)
If she were not a citizen and didnt have coverage she may have been refused treatment and died.
Also some countries do NOT give citizenship to children born outside the country just because their parents are citizens.. so if those kids are NOT citizens of the USA and NOT citizens of the parents country -- where they fuck are they citizens??? citizens of NOWHERE?? how do they ever get a passport or drivers license or ANYTHING???
this is a really DUMB idea.
Looking at that list I've just now discovered a toone of other reasns not to vote for Ron Paul..
|
Kitty, you know I love you, but it has to be said for the lurkers that are reading if no one else:
You do realize that there is a huge number of people that feel this is a great idea. You would probably find that there are a lot more Americans against the "anchor baby" theory than in favor of it.
As far as finding "a toone of other reasns not to vote for Ron Paul" I am relatively confident that if you were diligent, you could find "a ton of reasons" to not vote for Obama or anyone else. :2 cents: |
