GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   1 ron paul quote, keep the hate out. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=799030)

baddog 01-12-2008 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13642746)
Ha ha, nice word play. I dont think he mentioned the states breaking away from the united states. Whats implied is that states should have the power to give the people a say on their rights, which the federal gov does not do at this point. Just ask him...

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/209/4...2b4c69.jpg?v=0

You are as much of an idiot as he is.

TheDoc 01-12-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 13642375)
I can field this one.....even though I won't be voting for Paul.

I simply take a look at my own life.

What has a federal government agency done for me (that i use) my entire life?

Interstate I-95, a big shitty congested road that runs from Miami to almost Canada.

But even the rest stops i hit along that road, are payed for/ran by the states.

Second part of your question. What will all the government workers do?

Stop being slack bitches (who basically don't work 2/3rds of the day)

Everyone knows a govt job is a cake walk/do nothing job. So I'm guessing they might have to get a job where work is involved?

Our lives would all be better/cheaper with half the govt finding new jobs.

Hehe, yeah I guess most govt jobs are a cake walk and we do have a few to many gov agency's that really do nothing.

I like what he says, but maybe I should give a view point. I don't think our Gov idea is correct in theory. Even at it's most simple structure is still has massive flaws which has forced the fed to step in.

So.. I don't think his ideas will acually correct our problems because it will just be opening doors for other problems, and repeat issues, and tons of legal fights..

Anyway, on the flip side I know other Gov's work really well, good tax structures, medical, freedom for the people, all of it. And that Gov structure isn't anything like ours.

So no, I really don't support Ron Paul. However if it comes down to it I probably would vote for him simply because it might work and if not, I can move.

baddog 01-12-2008 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 13642755)
If I may interject here,

"Rouge" is actually French for "red", pronounced ROOJE.

The actual word some of you are so feebly scrambling in the dark for is Rogue

Main Entry: rogue
Pronunciation: \ˈrōg\
Function: noun
Etymology: origin unknown
Date: 1561
1 : vagrant tramp
2 : a dishonest or worthless person : scoundrel
3 : a mischievous person : scamp
4 : a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave
5 : an individual exhibiting a chance and usually inferior biological variation
? roguˇish \ˈrō-gish\ adjective
? roguˇishˇly adverb
? roguˇishˇness noun


/lesson

Okay carry on...

So they aren't suggesting attacking the red states? That changes everything. :winkwink:

buzzy 01-12-2008 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13642728)
Let me get this straight. Are you suggesting that it is better for us to be individual states rather than one union?

No, just what is the point of having states if they can't do anything or have any power?

buzzy 01-12-2008 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13642737)
Guess I should have read further . . . you are an idiot.

Ok old man, dosen't bother me if you want to go to war with the rest of the world. All empires will eventually fall, especially when their economy has turned to cow shit! :Oh crap

baddog 01-12-2008 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13642769)
No, just what is the point of having states if they can't do anything or have any power?

They do. Just not as much as Paul wants to toss on them. Not every state can afford the same things as CA, so do we all make them suffer as a result?

baddog 01-12-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13642773)
All empires will eventually fall

Guess coming from the UK you would know that as well as anyone.

BTW, I don't ever recall the US declaring itself an "empire."

buzzy 01-12-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13642784)
Guess coming from the UK you would know that as well as anyone.

yES, exactly, so take notes.

kane 01-12-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 13642731)
The prez would have ultimate power over the states, he is just proposing to give them more control so I doubt anything that bad as you mentioned would happen.

I wouldn't be so quick to think that. Recently there were many states that voted on banning gay marriage. There was a state recently that also voted on banning abortion and testing those waters. With the support of the prez a state by state ban on abortion (for those that did vote it in) could easily happen.

A ban on booze out of sight? Hardly. There are still states that have dry counties. I can easily see how they could take the next step.

I am all four state and local governments having a say in how they run and giving the citizens of those states and cities a voice in how they live, but I think anytime you start having one state voting to take away freedoms it is a bad situation and could eventually really divide the country.

collegeboobies 01-12-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13642784)
Guess coming from the UK you would know that as well as anyone.

BTW, I don't ever recall the US declaring itself an "empire."



Umm yes its not a requirement that an empire be "declared" to be an empire.

I would argue other points people make but the thread title says keep out the hate, so I'm done with this thread it seems Ron Paul critics have anger issues.

collegeboobies 01-12-2008 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 13642863)
I wouldn't be so quick to think that. Recently there were many states that voted on banning gay marriage. There was a state recently that also voted on banning abortion and testing those waters. With the support of the prez a state by state ban on abortion (for those that did vote it in) could easily happen.

A ban on booze out of sight? Hardly. There are still states that have dry counties. I can easily see how they could take the next step.

I am all four state and local governments having a say in how they run and giving the citizens of those states and cities a voice in how they live, but I think anytime you start having one state voting to take away freedoms it is a bad situation and could eventually really divide the country.


Yo dude the states can pretty much ban abortion or allow or ban gay marriage now. Whats gonna change on that? Not much. Everyone isnt for gay marriage, everyone isnt against abortion, yet we expect the whole country to obey one rule when its split almost 50/50?

notoldschool 01-12-2008 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 13642863)
but I think anytime you start having one state voting to take away freedoms it is a bad situation and could eventually really divide the country.


You mean this isnt already the fact? I think the country has been divided since its creation.

kane 01-12-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13642873)
Yo dude the states can pretty much ban abortion or allow or ban gay marriage now. Whats gonna change on that? Not much. Everyone isnt for gay marriage, everyone isnt against abortion, yet we expect the whole country to obey one rule when its split almost 50/50?

The difference is now you can fight this on a federal level and have it struck down. If we have a president that wants to promote this he could do away with that federal outlet.

kane 01-12-2008 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13642876)
You mean this isnt already the fact? I think the country has been divided since its creation.

I understand that. I'm saying that giving states too much individual power could only make it worse.

collegeboobies 01-12-2008 01:52 PM

kane:

You think he is going to get rid of the Supreme Court? He is not going to change the court systems or their decisions. He is going to shift responsibilities to different areas.

kane 01-12-2008 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies (Post 13642916)
kane:

You think he is going to get rid of the Supreme Court?

no I don't but what good is promising states expanded power if it will just be overseen/overruled by the supreme court? Let's take the abortion issue for example. If your state bans abortion then someone challenges it and it ends up before the supreme court and the supreme court says that roe v wade overrules the state law what is the point of passing the state law in the first place?

If you are going to expand the power of individual states you need to do something to make sure they can then use that power. I don't know what is plan it, but he must have something in mind.

Pleasurepays 01-12-2008 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 13642921)
no I don't but what good is promising states expanded power if it will just be overseen/overruled by the supreme court? Let's take the abortion issue for example. If your state bans abortion then someone challenges it and it ends up before the supreme court and the supreme court says that roe v wade overrules the state law what is the point of passing the state law in the first place?


maybe he's too busy smoking his 100% legal, totally risk free medical marijuana to grasp what you are saying.

baddog 01-12-2008 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 13642901)
I understand that. I'm saying that giving states too much individual power could only make it worse.

They think the south should have won.

IllTestYourGirls 01-12-2008 07:11 PM

The "game plan" was already written. It is called The Constitution :thumbsup

Government is really simple if you just follow the instructions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 13641139)
Dr. Paul is a great idea man, just read/listen to him, he has the best ideas ever... But that's all they are, ideas. With no game plan to back them up.


notoldschool 01-12-2008 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 13644114)
The "game plan" was already written. It is called The Constitution :thumbsup

Government is really simple if you just follow the instructions.

Quoted for truth.

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13643368)
They think the south should have won.

Who are you referring to?

TheDoc 01-12-2008 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 13644114)
The "game plan" was already written. It is called The Constitution :thumbsup

Government is really simple if you just follow the instructions.

The constitution isn't a game plan, it's an idea on how to run the Gov. A game plan would be telling us how he is going to achieve some of more complex goals.

SifuE 01-12-2008 11:04 PM

Vote RON PAUL


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123