GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - blue-eyed individuals have a single, common ancestor

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - blue-eyed individuals have a single, common ancestor (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=804416)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 13729460)

Not true but it's indeed rare:

"Even the genetics of eye color inheritance isn't as cut-and-dried as was once thought, as blue-eyed parents have been known (rarely) to have a brown-eyed child" - http://chemistry.about.com/cs/howthi...f/eyecolor.htm

that's down to the postman or gardener ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 13728222)

sounds like BS to me, aren't all kids born with blue eyes?

http://chemistry.about.com/cs/howthi...f/eyecolor.htm

Quote from the article:

"but no matter what the color is now, it may have been blue when you were born."

Seriously, I see this so many times. An article states something as being true while the very first sentence reads "MAY".

Bad reporting.

Seems I'm a bit late haha

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enemator (Post 13730901)

Walk into any nursery, look at the kids or talk to the nurse, they will tell you most all kids start off with blue eyes and they change later

http://ask.yahoo.com/20060110.html
http://missbakersbiologyclass.com/bl...ith-blue-eyes/

The fact that most children are born with blue eyes leave doubt that man didn't always have blue eyes

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 13731196)

Keyword here, again, is "most". A lot can happen in 6k-8k years. Especially evolutionairy wise when it comes to people. there weren't many of us back then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enemator (Post 13731264)

Keyword here, again, is "most". A lot can happen in 6k-8k years. Especially evolutionairy wise when it comes to people. there weren't many of us back then.

I agree, what I don't agree is that it all started with one person, more like a whole tribe or several tribes in one or many area's due to evolution

very interesting article.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 13731372)

I agree, what I don't agree is that it all started with one person, more like a whole tribe or several tribes in one or many area's due to evolution

I agree that is possible :)

I wonder how bible freaks look at this news. When you get down to it, we're one big incestuous bunch of fuck-ups according to the bible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enemator (Post 13731397)

I agree that is possible :)

I wonder how bible freaks look at this news. When you get down to it, we're one big incestuous bunch of fuck-ups according to the bible.

The bible freaks don't have a clue, the bible itself is a practice in condradictions, here's two examples that are close to this

Cursed is he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother.
- Deuteronomy 27:22

And Abraham said... She is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.
- Genesis 20:11,12

-----------------------------------------
If brethren dwell together, and one of them die and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry without unto a stranger; her husband's brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him to wife.
- Deuteronomy 25:5

If a man shall take his brother's wife, it is an unclean thing... they shall be childless.
- Leviticus 20:21

We are all a mutation in one way or another...

must be me i got blonde hair and blue eyes, yay