GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Gaytube.com (hosted by SwitfWill) - your new stolen content tube (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=809862)

MPGdevil 02-23-2008 04:43 PM

Funny how thiefs, cheaters and scammers always are so full of bullshit and bad excuses :error

Suddenly "found" 42 copyrighted videos? lol ... it's a job to check content BEFORE uploading and not AFTER :helpme

Juicy D. Links 02-23-2008 05:13 PM

oyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Damian_Maxcash 02-23-2008 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPGdevil (Post 13822417)
Funny how thiefs, cheaters and scammers always are so full of bullshit and bad excuses :error

Suddenly "found" 42 copyrighted videos? lol ... it's a job to check content BEFORE uploading and not AFTER :helpme

Its a site that, as far as I can see, lets users submit....

So it WILL have 'illegal' content on it.

User submission sites can not be run by the (our) book.

You cant check the status of all the vids submitted to a site with more than a few dozen vids a day.

I doubt Shap or his staff uploaded anything 'illegal'.

The only way to run a site like this is to not allow user submits.

--------------------------------------------

Also remember there is a legal loophole that means by calling Shap's site illegal you are opening yourselves up for legal action.

Its immoral, but is it illegal? Bigger fish than anyone on GFY have tried to prove it is.

pastafari 02-23-2008 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GayTube Jack (Post 13821812)
hi everyone. i am jack and my job is to run gaytube.
i'm writing because shap's away until next week and i did not see him post so i am posting.
i found 42 videos (out of 600 total on gaytube) that were copyrighted so i deleted them. illegal videos are not allowed on the site. so if you find any copyright material plz email me [email protected] and they will be gone. ok that is all,bye for now.

Looks like scumbag Shap got himself a new nick

Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-23-2008 05:38 PM

the ownage in this thread is made of pure win.

i approve of this thread :thumbsup:

Vick! 02-23-2008 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GayTube Jack (Post 13821812)
hi everyone. i am jack and my job is to run gaytube.
i'm writing because shap's away until next week and i did not see him post so i am posting.
i found 42 videos (out of 600 total on gaytube) that were copyrighted so i deleted them. illegal videos are not allowed on the site. so if you find any copyright material plz email me [email protected] and they will be gone. ok that is all,bye for now.

Fake Nick # 97255

Quote:

Originally Posted by xclusive (Post 13822156)
I'm sure he hasn't seen this thread with being away and all:upsidedow

http://www.skinnytwink.com/gfy/shap/shap-active.jpg

Dude, I am scared of you. serious. :)

will76 02-23-2008 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 13822035)
Welcome to the board, Jack! :1orglaugh

i bet $100 thats not " Jack ". :1orglaugh



So, "Jack" you do know that Shap claims he spent MILLIONS fightig stolen content, and Shap owns a Tube site that allows anyone to upload videos to it (many of which are stolen) and he doesnt take the time to bother to police it. The peter north one didnt take a rocket scientist to catch that one.

Some majorily fucked up here.

Vick! 02-23-2008 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 13822607)
i bet $100 thats not " Jack ". :1orglaugh

Out of curiosity, who the hell pointed this guy Jack toward gfy and this thread? Even if we consider this Jack is real. :winkwink:

JFK 02-23-2008 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 13822589)
Fake Nick # 97255



Dude, I am scared of you. serious. :)

are you absolutely sure its "Fake Nick # 97255" ? Post proof or be banned :Graucho

will76 02-23-2008 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quickdraw (Post 13821434)
Same as pornhub.com which happens to be just a couple digits from them on that ip space. Swiftwill must love them.

anyone else putting 2 and 2 together here?

Brazzers own pornhub.com It was full of stolen content then got called out on GFY and Brazzers blammed it on "partners" and claim they had nothing to do with it they are just silent partners. The site gets cleaned up over night.

Brazzers advertises on several illegal tube sites next to stolen content.

Twistys *claims* to have spent millions fighting stolen content but then does business with Redtube. They get called out for it and fucked by redtube so they stop.

So of all sites, Twistys chooses to do business and cross sales with Brazzers.

Shap owns Gaytube.com which was full of stolen content and gets called out on GFY, over night the stolen content is removed.

Pornhub and gaytube hosted at the same company. How many connections and similarities are there between Brazzers and Shap. Seems like these two people come from the same school of thought and i would bet anything there are doing some major deals and idea sharing behind the scenes.


Now "Jack" posts on here saying he cleaned up gaytube. Probably a fake nick. Regardless the point is that shap owns gaytube and it was full of stolen content. My question, if Shap claims to have spent millions fighting stolen content they why doesnt he police his own fucking tube site and he obviously lets anyone upload anything they want to it. PeterNorth 80 minute video?

Some of you people are so fucked up and crocked its beyond sad.

john_63 02-23-2008 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 13822622)
Out of curiosity, who the hell pointed this guy Jack toward gfy and this thread? Even if we consider this Jack is real. :winkwink:

:1orglaugh

this is just getting better and better.

will76 02-23-2008 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 13822079)
I wasn't coming to the defense of anyone. Just stating that there are plenty of people who post on GFY who have nothing better to do.

and how many posts do you have ??? :1orglaugh:helpme


I would much rather read threads about people being held accountable then would you hit it or what did you eat for dinner tonight type threads.

ladida 02-23-2008 06:04 PM

Jack was always on gfy, he just didn't register before, c'mon!! :))))))

Vick! 02-23-2008 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 13822625)
are you absolutely sure its "Fake Nick # 97255" ? Post proof or be banned :Graucho

*heading to my photochop* :winkwink:

Vick! 02-23-2008 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 13822666)
Jack was always on gfy, he just didn't register before, c'mon!! :))))))

damn, you beat Jack to it. I asked the question to get this answer from Jack, shit could become even more funny .. :winkwink: :1orglaugh

will76 02-23-2008 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash (Post 13822479)
Its a site that, as far as I can see, lets users submit....

So it WILL have 'illegal' content on it.

User submission sites can not be run by the (our) book.

You cant check the status of all the vids submitted to a site with more than a few dozen vids a day.

I doubt Shap or his staff uploaded anything 'illegal'.

The only way to run a site like this is to not allow user submits.

--------------------------------------------

Also remember there is a legal loophole that means by calling Shap's site illegal you are opening yourselves up for legal action.

Its immoral, but is it illegal? Bigger fish than anyone on GFY have tried to prove it is.


Bullshit, its called hiring an employee... wow what a novel fucking idea.

All videos watermarked get deleted on sight. All videos under 2 mins can go live (not many stolen videos under 2 mins getting uploaded if any, its all the long stuff.) If the video is over 2 mins it doesnt go live untill that emplyee (lets call him jack) can review the video. You know how to review the video to see if it is a real amateur video... wait for this one, another novel idea, you tell the person uploading the video of themselves to hold up a sign in the begging saying " this video is for gaytube" the employee (jack) sees that i nthe first couple seconds of the video and he knows it is a "real" user submitted amateur made video.

Please if I hear one more of you idiots telling me " it can't be done".... of course it could be done. It isn't hard to do either. Its called hiring an employee... but they dont want to pay for someone and they want the long stolen videos.

seeric 02-23-2008 06:20 PM

if it is true. why are people surprised?
fuck i been telling you people all along that good people are going to go to the dark side to compete.
more coming. mark my words.

pornask 02-23-2008 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jet (Post 13822561)
the ownage in this thread is made of pure win.

i approve of this thread :thumbsup:

fukcing rights :thumbsup

...anyonw still promoting Twisty's?

Damian_Maxcash 02-23-2008 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 13822697)
Bullshit, its called hiring an employee... wow what a novel fucking idea.

All videos watermarked get deleted on sight. All videos under 2 mins can go live (not many stolen videos under 2 mins getting uploaded if any, its all the long stuff.) If the video is over 2 mins it doesnt go live untill that emplyee (lets call him jack) can review the video. You know how to review the video to see if it is a real amateur video... wait for this one, another novel idea, you tell the person uploading the video of themselves to hold up a sign in the begging saying " this video is for gaytube" the employee (jack) sees that i nthe first couple seconds of the video and he knows it is a "real" user submitted amateur made video.

Please if I hear one more of you idiots telling me " it can't be done".... of course it could be done. It isn't hard to do either. Its called hiring an employee... but they dont want to pay for someone and they want the long stolen videos.

What I was trying to say was that you CANT run a legit tube site with user submits.

How many "moderaters' do you think RedTube would have needed when it was open submit?

It would have been a MASSIVE job. Not 1 or 2 people but dozens... have you looked at there stats?

It can only be done by the book if it is 'owner submitted'.

ladida 02-23-2008 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 13822714)
if it is true. why are people surprised?
fuck i been telling you people all along that good people are going to go to the dark side to compete.
more coming. mark my words.

You aren't surprised? He wasn't just a good guy, he was openly fighting against things.

pornask 02-23-2008 06:47 PM

100 shady program owners

ladida 02-23-2008 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 13822644)
anyone else putting 2 and 2 together here?

Brazzers own pornhub.com It was full of stolen content then got called out on GFY and Brazzers blammed it on "partners" and claim they had nothing to do with it they are just silent partners. The site gets cleaned up over night.

Brazzers advertises on several illegal tube sites next to stolen content.

Twistys *claims* to have spent millions fighting stolen content but then does business with Redtube. They get called out for it and fucked by redtube so they stop.

So of all sites, Twistys chooses to do business and cross sales with Brazzers.

Shap owns Gaytube.com which was full of stolen content and gets called out on GFY, over night the stolen content is removed.

Pornhub and gaytube hosted at the same company. How many connections and similarities are there between Brazzers and Shap. Seems like these two people come from the same school of thought and i would bet anything there are doing some major deals and idea sharing behind the scenes.

You know, these things crossed my mind aswell. I actually think Shap bought a stake in brazzers since i saw that cross-sell. I'm doubtfull he would, out of the blue, start cross-sells with another site just like that, or because they offered him something that some other big sites didn't/couldn't. It could be that brazzers bought part of twisty also, but somehow i see it as the other way around, especially with all the influx of "exclusive new content" in brazzers last year or so. It's got Shap's handprint somehow :)

fuckingfuck 02-23-2008 07:22 PM

It's a shame that they were caught at alexa ranking 2000, before they could reach top 200. with only 1-2 min videos it's only downhill from here :)

Damian_Maxcash 02-23-2008 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuckingfuck (Post 13822934)
It's a shame that they were caught at alexa ranking 2000, before they could reach top 200. with only 1-2 min videos it's only downhill from here :)

I am not sticking up for any one side here - but, if he wants to shove full vids on the site he can. They are in no way restricted to 1-2 min clips.

He owns massive amounts of content.

fuckingfuck 02-23-2008 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash (Post 13822969)
I am not sticking up for any one side here - but, if he wants to shove full vids on the site he can. They are in no way restricted to 1-2 min clips.

He owns massive amounts of content.

The difference is this: Unlike straight porn, best gay porn is produced by a few studios and CCBill programs who want to keep all the vids exclusive to their own programs... So none of those titles are available in content stores or VOD.

Damian_Maxcash 02-23-2008 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuckingfuck (Post 13822981)
The difference is this: Unlike straight porn, best gay porn is produced by a few studios and CCBill programs who want to keep all the vids exclusive to their own programs... So none of those titles are available in content stores or VOD.

There are 1000's of gay DVDs on sale for the trade.

OK, he cant use the best - but he is far from restricted to 1-2 min clips.

fuckingfuck 02-23-2008 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash (Post 13822996)
There are 1000's of gay DVDs on sale for the trade.

OK, he cant use the best - but he is far from restricted to 1-2 min clips.

How do you know that the licenses he has cover that kind of use in a tube site?

pornask 02-23-2008 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash (Post 13822969)
I am not sticking up for any one side here - but, if he wants to shove full vids on the site he can. They are in no way restricted to 1-2 min clips.

He owns massive amounts of content.

He collects membership fee for his own content (on his paysite). He's not gonna go berserk posting full lenght vids of his own, cause that would mean less sign ups to his own site. Posting stolen content is much easier. It doesn't affect your paysite and once the tube site has steady flow of high traffic, he can use it to promote his paysite by posting his own 2 minute clips. Guy's got it figured. Wander how many webmasters are gonna continue promoting his sites despite this thievery :Oh crap

sexykat 02-23-2008 07:59 PM

I had respect for the guy, not anymore

Damian_Maxcash 02-23-2008 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuckingfuck (Post 13823014)
How do you know that the licenses he has cover that kind of use in a tube site?

How do you know he dosnt?

Im not the one accusing anyone of anything.

Daruma 02-23-2008 08:13 PM

someone register and startup ShapTube.com (its available) and nail every one of his videos on the site

ladida 02-23-2008 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daruma (Post 13823118)
someone register and startup ShapTube.com (its available) and nail every one of his videos on the site

Actually doing something like this for every sponsor that is advertising on tube sites full of stolen content would actually be hillarious. Imagine "Brazzertube", "Shaptube" and all those. What would be even more funny is when they complained you'd ask them to point the stolen videos to you and that you'd comply immediatelly! :)

Gambrinus 02-23-2008 11:39 PM

bump back to the front

Fizzgig 02-24-2008 01:07 AM

Is there no end to the tube sites?

digifan 02-24-2008 01:57 AM

Incredible...

MPGdevil 02-24-2008 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damian_Maxcash (Post 13822763)
What I was trying to say was that you CANT run a legit tube site with user submits.

How many "moderaters' do you think RedTube would have needed when it was open submit?

It would have been a MASSIVE job. Not 1 or 2 people but dozens... have you looked at there stats?

It can only be done by the book if it is 'owner submitted'.

If you can't run a legit site because of lack of time or resources to check submissions, maybe you shouldn't accept submissions to begin with :2 cents:

stickyfingerz 02-24-2008 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MPGdevil (Post 13824561)
If you can't run a legit site because of lack of time or resources to check submissions, maybe you shouldn't accept submissions to begin with :2 cents:

People just dont understand why tube sites can even operate without 2257 info. I REALLY wish someone would CLEARLY explain 2257 and user uploaded material, and dmca requests to the masses. Its an all or nothing situation.

Davy 02-24-2008 09:22 AM

That is fucked up!
Shap = powerfag of the year.

Trixxxia 02-24-2008 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 13822714)
if it is true. why are people surprised?
fuck i been telling you people all along that good people are going to go to the dark side to compete.
more coming. mark my words.

I have to agree with you A1R3k - sadly

Corona 02-24-2008 10:41 AM

http://blog.scottjelias.net/wp-conte...chermirror.jpg


Shap?...Shap?........Shap?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc