![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If so he was lying to you. The license is included in the buying process for the buyer to download, keep and print on all sales. It's also in the clients shopping basket area for all time. Marcel never signed is and sent it to us, if he had he would of got it back signed by one of my staff. It would clearly state the content, price and what the content was licensed for. Andre never made a purchase on the site according to our data base, are you saying he was an owner of smokincash and sold it to Marcel? I have the license in the database and can see it. Want to see the proof? |
Quote:
solved or tell him which content is yours that needs to be removed instead of going back and forth over misunderstandings. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he had made a fair prosposal we would have solved already, also the reason why he refuses to tell us exactly what and where his content is, we would have removed it by now x times but he didn't tell us upon all our requests. It's obvious he is not interested in solving the issue the one or other way, at least not so far... |
The licenses as on our database. The licenses Marcel could of printed out and kept and got me to sign. The licenses he could of got to sign.
Clearly states the content license is not for affiliate distribution and reselling content to other webmasters. http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada1.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada2.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada4.jpg The domains allowed by Marcel to display the content on. http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada3.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/pononada5.jpg Want to claim it's a photochop? Other customers will tell you these exist. I will allow a trusted third party to login and see the licenses on the database. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He knows this URL has our content, I told him yesterday on Ask Damage. http://www.smokinaccess.com/ Do you still see our content on that page? OK here's an offer again. Take down the content you don't own NOW. Or pay for it. Including the affiliates use license. Pornonada can make a public offer here and now. Pornonada has had countless offers from me, from $2,000 down to a free banner on AD. All refused. Content still used. And probably still inside the site. We only have his word it's not and it's on the tour, on the affiliates side and given out on http://www.smokinaccess.com/ So all this content is NOT in the members area? Maybe Pornonada would like to give me a login to the members area. He kicked me out of the affiliates area when he knew I had caught him out. Maybe someone else would like to look. |
Quote:
There might be others purchases he made under different names. Andre never bought. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[QUOTE=Paul Markham;13824250] Content still used. And probably still inside the site. We only have his word it's not and it's on the tour, on the affiliates side and given out on http://www.smokinaccess.com/ Yes, it's still there on the tour i guess and yes, it's on the affilates area which i got aware yesterday, but i take the full vault for that as well as i don't await that anybody believes me that i wasn't aware that some content was/is used on some FHGs Quote:
They are being restored step by step by the new owners with the content we got back from the other content providers. And yes, i realy hope there is NO content from you there Quote:
|
Quote:
Or make a final public offer to get this resolved, because we are already in contact with removeyourcontent.com and i want hesitate to pay him to remove your content from allover smokincash to have this unlucky chapter finally closed. It's all up to you as i admit ALL my mistakes and it's more than obvious that i try to solve the situation one or the other way.... |
Quote:
|
Some clarification for readers who don't know what "the shitlist" is: it is a forum on another board where shady sponsors are listed.
Pornonada is a moderator on that board, not an owner, so I'm not sure why or how Paul thought he could action the removal of the thread shitlisting him. Ditto with banner ads on that forum. |
Quote:
We will supply you with a new FTP for the content and new licenses. Content use in the affiliates area is, 3 times the original purchase price to give it to affiliates and 5 times the original price to put it in FHGs and give it to affiliates. Less the original purchase price paid by Marcel. So 2 and 4 times. |
Quote:
|
Wait, am I following this right: he
a. Never saw the license BUT b. clearly violated the license How would he know he violated the license if he has never seen it? |
Quote:
He said he had looked at the licenses on our site and said he thought they were made out to a domain. He must of seen we do not license for affiliate use. Does that clear up that one? Pornonada if you are selling the site I think you had best take all our content down. Don't want this all over again. |
Quote:
I was put on the shit list when I refused to give affiliates un watermarked content. Seems DamageX thinks we should and to disagree with him is good enough to get you shit listed. :Oh crap http://www.smokinaccess.com/images/myexpic1_big.jpg |
Quote:
reading your next post it seems you would like to have that whole thing taxed another time when the program is finally transfered to the new owners. But anyway, that offer isn't of any interest for me neither i want to deal in some days again with the transfer to the new owner again so i will stick with the removal. Send me please the 5 issued licenses so we can lookup your content and forward them to removeyourcontent so he can go through everything way faster and more easy or send them just directly to him if you feel more comfortable that way, there is actually no need for me. So in some time your content will be removed from all smokincash sites, fhgs and tours, i hope you are satisfied now. Now the final question, as the content would get lost that way i at very least would prefer that the previous owner and original buyer of the content could use the content than. How much will it cost to add an additionally doman to the license agreement? From what i see the license is for 10 domains, but only used on 3 domains, so is there a fee to have the 3 removed and add other domains to the previous owner so at very least he can use the content?! Just a thought so the money paid once isn't lost totally. |
Quote:
As i said, i didn't comment anything in the thread you mention, so i will have to look it up when i have some spare time... |
i would say that this is the typical paul thread
|
HAHAH THIS PIC IS TOO DAMN FUNNY:-
http://www.sharkyfarts.com/gallery/d...magic-paul.jpg Sorry ... but it's hilarious .... HHAHA OMFG HAHAHAHAH http://www.sharkyfarts.com/gallery/d...magic-paul.jpg |
owner of photographs issues license for use of his/her copyrighted work. If this work is used outside of license terms, it's wrong. Plain and simple. If you don't have the license to publish images affiliate areas, you simply can't do that. There's nothing else to discuss here.
|
Quote:
But the original license does not give the licensee the right to resell it. So if you want to sell it on again you're asking for a brand new license. Not the old one transfered. A license we don't give to others. As for the original buyer using the content again. This clearly shows your lack of understanding of license terms. Go back and read them and see why I am well within my rights to turn down this request. License terms are there for a reason. To stop people from abusing them. As for your eagerness to remove the content. You can make an immediate start with these banners and any content that relates to them inside the site. LesboFever.com MyExGirlfriendz.com ToyTeenies.com And the images that are with this one. http://www.smokinaccess.com/images/myexpic1_big.jpg But you have known this for a while now. The rest I will do when I have time, I have to go shopping. But here's a tip. If you don't own a license you probably should question whether you have the rights to publish or resell it to a new owner. I never said you had anything to do with getting me shit listed. So no accusations. |
Quote:
What are you trying to do? Do you mean that the proposal is US$ 250 for transfering it to me and at the very same time a brand new license for US$ 2.200 for the new owners of smokincash in some days? Or is it US$ 250 to me and US$ 250 for the new owners? I realy get confused with all that offers and proposals... |
Quote:
I know that the affiliate program was a corp since we were paid out of a corp account. at least in canada and i believe in the US, the default status of a representative of a corporation entering into an agreement using that company money to pay for said agreement is "agent of" status. basically under the conditions you stated you entered into a fraudlent contract which would allow the corporation (smokincash) the right to revoke and ask for a refund. if i were pornonada would be asking questions like did you get the directors of the smokincash corporation to sign off on the assignment of a licience to an outside individual? if the answer is yes can you prove that you got such written authorization ? |
Paul you know full well what you are doing here is wrong.
There is no point in arguing with you. You only hear what you want to hear, and in doing so your argument is skewed. A misunderstanding does not make one a 'Scammer and Pirate', but if it makes you feel better, carry on with your lies, many lies since this started. |
Pornonada, I'd just say "fuck it" and remove his content. Too much hassle over something that should be very simple to resolve. I'm sick of reading all these twists myself, you must be tearing your hair out trying to understand what the fuck Paul wants you to do...
|
Quote:
if the pornonada were to pay you $250 why does he have to do it as an individual why can't he purchase it as the corporation so that when he sells it the liciencee does not change the new owner of the corporation would own the existing licience and therefore have no need to purchase another licience from you again, because there was no tranfer of the liciences (since it was the same corporation) you seem to be saying that a corporation can't buy a licience, which brings us back to my original post. |
Quote:
|
Three pages?
|
ladidadida...
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123