Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 14223681)

:)

yes.

:)


the reason behind me isolating to two is that the american sheeple will vote for the top two. has there ever been someone who wasnt a front runner that actually surprised the shit out of everyone and won? off the top of my head i don't recall. i'm well aware of the other candidates in the running, i just don't realistically see any of them winning. i got this gut feeling that he's gonna be the next president.

:)

Originally Posted by OTerror (Post 14225406)

this may be true but he is black and white.

Originally Posted by robfantasy (Post 14225392)

you know a good way to look at it is like this...

look at your business.. say you had to go out of town for a month, would you let some new kid who who you have never heard of, who shows up to your front door and talks all hype and bullshit and tells you how much money he is going to make you while you are gone even though he has never had any business experience at all, but has "all these great ideas"...

or would you leave your business in the hands of someone who knows your business, has been involved in the industry, has years of wisdom and has seen your business from all angles.

i would rest easier at night with the later.

if i didnt give a fuck and wanted to give a new kid a shot because i have enough money and it wouldnt really matter if my business was run to the ground or not, i would go with the new kid.

but do we want to take that risk on the future of our country?

i think not.

go with mccain and hope a better candidate pops up for 2012.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14225449)

What if you the experienced guy (older guy) was going to try and destroy your business once you left (or he got in power)... he even tells you this straight to your face.

Do you now take your chances with a guy that might not know everything, but has advisor's to help? Or the guy that you know for damn sure crush you when he gets in power?

Not sure myself - hard choice to make.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14225449)

What if you the experienced guy (older guy) was going to try and destroy your business once you left (or he got in power)... he even tells you this straight to your face.

Do you now take your chances with a guy that might not know everything, but has advisor's to help? Or the guy that you know for damn sure crush you when he gets in power?

Not sure myself - hard choice to make.

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 14225408)

You got no clue about me fool.
Business never been better for me actually, and I am about launch one hella of a traffic network:)
TO bad your program won't be making the list!:thumbsup

PS you should fix the link to busty sage...
I went through your program the other day.

Originally Posted by Pornwolf (Post 14226307)

Yunno, I like Baddog. But in this case I have to say you are too steeped in the way the world was to understand the way it's about to go.

Sure, there's plenty of rednecks that will not vote for Obama, but there's an awful lot of people that are going to make it a personal mission to get him into office. I don't think you've even begun to see the amount of rallying that's going to be around this guy.

Originally Posted by Rand (Post 14225738)

I'm so over the debate I don't know what to think.

Never has there been an election like this and it's come at a time when our country is in such bad shape. It's going to be a monumental task for whomever takes the Presidency. Each of the major candidates has their good and bad points. All you can do is vote for the candidate that you think would do the most good for our country both domestically and internationally.

I tend to lean toward Obama. I hate to hear about him being so different off-camera. I hope that is not his true character. But you don't get where he is by not having an edge. He's a young, inexperienced, black man with a real shot at this. I keep thinking how the world might react if he became our leader. And I think it would be a positive message.

He would also have to be aware of precedent should he win. That's an enormous amount of pressure to do well.



http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/n...6aed318c_o.jpg

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 14225131)

oh boy, thats not good. i don't like arrogant pricks.

at least the guy can spell and doesn't sound like a monkey taught to speak though.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14225419)

History? It hasn't happened yet.. How can you say Obama has a war History?

Or are you saying in History, new Presidents didn't pull out of wars? Which isn't the case. So I'm confused on what history I should check.

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 14226627)

bwahahahahahaha

mccain just got his own racist pastor dragged into this. the mud slingin is thick.

Originally Posted by Nails (Post 14226261)

What if the younger man wants to tax the shit out of you cause you actually make a good living. I dont want to pay for healthcare for people who can't afford it. I can afford it and I pay for it now. I also don't want more programs to help people who dont want to work.

Maybe for those who have no money, it's easy to support people who want to tax people who have money, but I want less taxes. Neither party is going to do shit about our profession and you can see california already trying to tax it as proof.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14226825)

And Cali passing this law against us is just another example of taxes increasing, under the power of a republicans. Not really a strong argument for the cause.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226641)

Name a war we were involved in that troops are not still there. Besides Nam.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226834)

What law is that?

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14226838)

Huh? We haven't really been in that many wars.. but here goes..

war of 1812
ww1
ww2
Nam

So we are still in?? Korea and Iraq...I think we are out of Panama, Bosnia, and Grenada... not that they were wars.

Your arguments are getting thin.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226843)

Really? We don't have troops in Germany, Cuba, Italy, Japan . . . etc.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226843)

Really? We don't have troops in Germany, Cuba, Italy, Japan . . . etc.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14226848)

We don't occupy them.. we have troops in Canada too, but that has nothing to do with a president pulling out of a war or not.

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14226853)

We went to war with Cuba?

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226843)

Really? We don't have troops in Germany, Cuba, Italy, Japan . . . etc.

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 14226627)

bwahahahahahaha

mccain just got his own racist pastor dragged into this. the mud slingin is thick.

i have never voted and i am doing it this year just to vote for obama. i wonder how many other people will do just that too.

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 14228348)

I love the false issues MSM plates for us. To bad neither has a plan to save the dollar besides "hope" and "charisma" :disgust Get ready for $15 dollar a gas next year.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226843)

Really? We don't have troops in Germany, Cuba, Italy, Japan . . . etc.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226881)

His comment was totally taken out of context and you know it. All he was saying is that when the war is over we will have troops there like we do every fucking where else.

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14226881)

Dude, I know you are smarter than that. You mean to tell me you don't know why we occupy Cuba? You don't know what war we were in that Cuba may have been involved with?

I graduated high school in 71 and I don't have to look that up.