![]() |
Quote:
|
I got a laptop with Vista as well. I wiped it and installed XP. It was less power user friendly it seems. I couldn't use a lot of hot keys for windows explorer.
|
Been on Vista for a few months now, and had no real problems at all with it... :pimp
|
vista requirement memory is 1gb
i dunno why.... |
Ive had 0 issues with vista on any of my machines. End of story lol. Doesn't crash, doesn't have program compatibility issues, isn't a resource hog. People are sheep.
The whole "its cool to hate vista" thing. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh Who else remembers the same shit when XP came out. "Ill stick with 98 fuck xp" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
I am in vista now :)
|
Quote:
I almost agree with you... :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
|
I'm a Mac user mostly, but have Vista installed in a few places. I've never had an issue. No crashing, No issues with old software or hardware. Nothing. We have an OEM install disc of Vista Ultimate with none of the bloatware the PC manufacturers install, so that helps I'm sure.
|
Quote:
half the time I turn it on and its locked up and even the three finger salute wont get its attention and yes it auto updates...face it its a turd you think it isnt ask yourself this...would i run my sites on it? |
Quote:
|
Im saying black waiting for sticky to come in and say white. lol
|
Quote:
is it a surprise here that a windows product isnt stable in a 24/7 environment? has there ever been one that is? has windows ever released an OS that you would run your money generating sites on? |
Quote:
|
Wow! 55 posts about some piece of shit.
|
Quote:
|
Got in on my new laptop, too, I really tried to give it a try, but I re-installed it with XP Pro after 10 minutes. Its slow compared to XP. And I have 3Gb RAM.
|
It has some nice stuff though.
|
Quote:
|
Blah-blah-blah...
Now a few facts: http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outs....html?hhTest=1 http://vista.blorge.com/2008/02/08/v...pre-sp1-vista/ http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windo...st-72059.shtml http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa...9281221,00.htm http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2007/11...nce-gains.html and so on... |
Quote:
wow, all these "new facts" are 5 different links about the same topic. That XP sp3 is faster. Very possible. I never tried sp3 but if they tested it then i sure believe that. But now explain how Vista is a piece of shit as you said a few posts above. Funny how its clear in this thread and for example the comments in the last link you posted that everyone who actually runs Vista loves it and 90% of the bashers only have read about it. Its cool to bash Vista right? Youre one of the cool guys if you do that. |
I am former Unix Admin and Windows MCSE ...
Two years ago I switched my work computers and family computers to Macs. I've not regreeted it for 1 second. Best choice ever, the amount of time I spend now maintaining 5 computers between myself wife & kids is almost nothing. Previously I was rebuilding my sons Windows boxes every 6 months because of spyware and shit that creeps in no matter how hard we tried to keep them clean. |
I use vista on my laptop and desktop and have used Linux on them before as well as XP. Linux is the only thing I would run on servers, however for home and business use I recommend the Windows platform.
I've used Vista successfully, running practically anything I want on it, without any problems or issues related with incompatibility between XP and Vista. I do have a powerful PC and a laptop that is fairly fast. If your computer is powerful, either Vista or XP SP2, SP3 is alright. I like Vista better because of the improved visual elements. Otherwise it is practically the same as XP. |
Quote:
|
Cyberxxx, come on, explain us why its such a piece of shit. Id really like to know.
|
well dirty f like it or not it crashes just idling and nothing is wrong with it other than it is unstable. deal with it
Im a UNIX admin, I taught college classes on UNIX Internals and I can tell you windows still hasnt gotten memory sharing right. Instead of trying to maintain backwards compatibility microsoft needed to do a complete overhaul from the ground up, a protected kernel ala UNIX would be a good fucking start. Its a turd man..no matter how much spin you put on it trying to call it miracle grow its still just bullshit |
Quote:
Its the most stable consumer OS from MS so far. Deal with it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
2) What's wrong with Microsoft Windows Vista? Any more questions? :) |
|
its slow and lame
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As about the 5 year old equipment. Personally I don't have a super-computer for work. I have a rather average PC: Core2Duo E6550/2Gb/GeForce 9600GT. However don't want to give away a half of my system resources to some OS just to let it launch itself. I want these resources for the applications I run. Vista has ZERO features that I can't found in XP. |
I avoid it like the plague
|
i have a powerbook and run vista ultimate as virtual os for microsoft office and trillian cause the Mac alternatives suck and i wanted to keep my history. for the rest i use mac programs. and surprise, surprise: it works smooth and fast.
i just hate that they changed the gui in vista for absolutely unnecessary reasons |
The most interesting thing is that according to various benchmarks, Mac is a most Windows-optimized PC ever. I'm not kidding - check it with google :winkwink:
|
Quote:
and yeah, it actually runs faster with windows than 99% of the windows laptops. but it also costs more than 99% of the windows laptops :Oh crap |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc