GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Iran Attacked = World War III ??? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=840902)

crockett 07-13-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TyroneGoldberg (Post 14452491)
Right, you mean just like the US is doing in Iraq. Ok.

Did you sleep through Dessert Storm or were you too young to remember it? We kicked Iraq's ass in DS1 and we kicked their Army's ass in the current Gulf War. The reason we are having problems there now, is because Bush and co are morons and are making our Army do something it's not equipped to do.

Military is likely unmatched when it comes to actual war. However much like every army in the world, ours isn't meant to be a police force. Thats why we are failing in Iraq and Afghan, simply because they are trying to use an attack force as a police force to keep peace.

papill0n 07-13-2008 03:30 PM

The world has tolerated one unjust invasion already. They won't do it again.

just a punk 07-13-2008 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14451836)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

What is Bavaria ?

http://www.mybavaria.co.za/blog/imag...RELENTLESS.JPG

directfiesta 07-13-2008 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 14455853)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh nice pic :thumbsup

brassmonkey 07-13-2008 04:54 PM

like biggie smalls said "im ready to die!":1orglaugh:1orglaugh rick james bitch!:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

bronco67 07-13-2008 04:59 PM

All depends on what your idea of World War is.

DS250 07-13-2008 05:50 PM

Have any of you idiots ever heard of the Iran/Iraq war? The worst fought war in the hitory of the world that dragged on for 8 years and Iran's military has not improved much since then. Even a depleted US could destroy Iran in not time at all and Israel just as quickly if they choose to.

tony286 07-13-2008 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot (Post 14455771)
The very same people who are preaching about how easy it would be for the US to whip Iran's ass, are the same people who would be crying because of lost comrades, high oil prices, high food prices, a weak dollar and an economy that is well and truly dead.

Wake up people....... you do NOT need another war. Your country is at its feet economically and things are going downhill fast whether you attack Iran or not... but if you do, the US will NOT recover from this. Remind yourselves, take a look at the current account (the stats are published by the CIA - a US agency):

https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../2187rank.html

Another war will financially ruin this country.

OzzyWeb1 07-13-2008 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 14451987)
maybe its time to move to a safe place like Australia...

lol! I'm in Aus, and the subtle mindfucking of "can't do this, can't do that" can be a bit much. It feels like Democracy = Dictatorship sometimes.

But like you said, it is a lot safer...especially now that the Australian government gave a $1Billion dollar donation to the Indonesian Sunami relief. How else is our government going to appease 200 million muslims - who until recently loved bombing us Aussies. :winkwink:

SilentKnight 07-13-2008 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14455062)
I really love democracy peace spreading countries , such as the USA ... and their representatives here .... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Hmm...Iran threatens to 'wipe Israel off the map' - and U.S. is the bad guy here for approving Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program? :disgust

buzzy 07-13-2008 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DS250 (Post 14456152)
Have any of you idiots ever heard of the Iran/Iraq war? The worst fought war in the hitory of the world that dragged on for 8 years and Iran's military has not improved much since then. Even a depleted US could destroy Iran in not time at all and Israel just as quickly if they choose to.

It has improved but Israel would stll crush it in an air strike, i just don't see them destroying EVERY weapon that Iran has, because all it would take is some rockets landing on tel aviv and it's over. Know what I mean? I don't think it's worth it at all...

tony286 07-13-2008 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14456291)
Hmm...Iran threatens to 'wipe Israel off the map' - and U.S. is the bad guy here for approving Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program? :disgust

Let's be real about this, everyone knows they have nothing to back it up with. So whats the point besides $15 a gallon gas?

directfiesta 07-13-2008 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14456291)
Hmm...Iran threatens to 'wipe Israel off the map' - and U.S. is the bad guy here for approving Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program? :disgust

The USA threatens daily various countries .... and actually do aggress countries ... Iran hasn't done anything aside from blabbing ....

And Iran doesn't try to wrap itself in the blanket of purety as the USA tries to ...

Did you ever think that they could have fired those missiles to US irak bases ?

fsudirectory 07-13-2008 07:12 PM

If Iran didnt "posture" since thast the buzz word in politics right now... about their military capabilities and idle threats, it wouldnt matter.

Israel may be small but they would destroy whatever Iran has. Dont act as if they havent been in there for years and have what they need mapped out. A few days bombarding Iran and their military outlets and nuclear facilities, a few missles that will probably miss Israel and hit someone else (Causing Iran more problems) since their new missile isnt even 100% out of development and it would be over.

All of this by Iran right now is to not look weak as Israel tests out their awesome aircraft while Iran needs to photoshop pictures of their missile tests.

SilentKnight 07-13-2008 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14456320)
The USA threatens daily various countries .... and actually do aggress countries ... Iran hasn't done anything aside from blabbing ....

Did you sleep through the Iran/Iraq war?

If Iran is only "blabbing" - what do you call their testing of medium-range missiles?

A hiccup?

Rochard 07-13-2008 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 14455795)
When Iran had the war with Iraq, it was very different then, because at the time, Iraq was a Military superpower, they had the 5th biggest military in the world and it was still growing, plus they were building nuclear weapons (allegedly).

Vietnam was a failure.

Iraq and Afghanistan have both been failures, USA and UK troops are still dying there, almost by the day.

Iran will be a much worse failure, they are more technologically advanced than you think.

Iraq and Afghanistan is far from being a failure.... I love it when people call it a "war". It's not a war. A war when the armies of two governments fight each other. Seems to me that the governments we were once fighting are no longer in power. Now it's an occupation. What you have right now is terrorists attacking US troops.

I don't understand all of this talk about the US leaving. We went to war with these countries; We own them. We are still in Germany, Japan, and Korea. Pulling out of Iraq is the worst thing we can do; The moment we leave these terrorists will turn their attention fully on the new government of Iraq which will crumble, and then they'll focus their attention back on us - On the US mainland.

As for Iran.... Whatever. It will be another joke, the "mother of all battles" just like in Iraq. We have missiles we can launch from the US that hit Iran; We have planes they can't see and aircraft carriers off their coast. The president of Iran has less support than President Bush does. It will be more of what happened in Iraq; Their army will flee into the darkness and hide like cowards. And the missiles they just launched..... They have some decent range, but they aren't exactly accurate.

cykoe6 07-13-2008 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RageCash-Ben (Post 14455829)
The world has tolerated one unjust invasion already. They won't do it again.

And what exactly would the "world" do? Pass a harshly worded UN resolution? :1orglaugh

directfiesta 07-13-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14456330)
Did you sleep through the Iran/Iraq war?

If Iran is only "blabbing" - what do you call their testing of medium-range missiles?

A hiccup?

Are you serious ?????

Iran/Iraq war was a proxy war done by Iraq for the USA ....

As for missiles, what is the problem ???? Israel has none ? Israel doesn't do test, such as dry run for simulated bombings... Israel never attacked any countries, so they have no reason to be defensive ?

Saddam destroyed his Scuid ( in accordance with the UN inspection process ): look where it got him .. at the end of a rope ..

Now look at North Korea now .. They showed muscle, now they are getting retribution ...

Iran never attacked any countries .... but got their democracy san=botaged bu the USA to put their Shah PUPPET ....

tony286 07-13-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14456331)
Iraq and Afghanistan is far from being a failure.... I love it when people call it a "war". It's not a war. A war when the armies of two governments fight each other. Seems to me that the governments we were once fighting are no longer in power. Now it's an occupation. What you have right now is terrorists attacking US troops.

I don't understand all of this talk about the US leaving. We went to war with these countries; We own them. We are still in Germany, Japan, and Korea. Pulling out of Iraq is the worst thing we can do; The moment we leave these terrorists will turn their attention fully on the new government of Iraq which will crumble, and then they'll focus their attention back on us - On the US mainland.

As for Iran.... Whatever. It will be another joke, the "mother of all battles" just like in Iraq. We have missiles we can launch from the US that hit Iran; We have planes they can't see and aircraft carriers off their coast. The president of Iran has less support than President Bush does. It will be more of what happened in Iraq; Their army will flee into the darkness and hide like cowards. And the missiles they just launched..... They have some decent range, but they aren't exactly accurate.

You cant compare those our countries to iraq. Once the war was over it was, in iraq every other day we hear about some of our guys dying. Also I love the thinking lets totally fuck up the iraqi peoples country so the terrorists dont come here and then we wonder why they hate us. lol

tony286 07-13-2008 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 14456335)
And what exactly would the "world" do? Pass a harshly worded UN resolution? :1orglaugh

Actually China and Russia said they didnt think it would be a good move. China owns a large piece of our debt.

directfiesta 07-13-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14456331)
What you have right now is terrorists attacking US troops.

Funny how you guys supported , armed and financed terrorists against the liberating Soviet forces in Afghanistan ...

directfiesta 07-13-2008 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14456331)
Iraq and Afghanistan is far from being a failure....

Quote:

* The Guardian,
* Monday July 14, 2008
* Article history

The Nato-led effort to subdue the Taliban suffered one of its heaviest blows since the 2001 invasion yesterday when nine US soldiers were killed and 15 other Nato troops injured in a day-long battle in a region close to the Pakistan border.

The US troops died as their base came under attack in Kunar province, eastern Afghanistan. The news puts further pressure on Pakistan, where coalition forces believe many Taliban militants are based. It was among the biggest losses for the coalition since the start of the war.
If you say so ...

cykoe6 07-13-2008 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14456341)
Actually China and Russia said they didnt think it would be a good move. China owns a large piece of our debt.

China's economy is very dependent on exports to the US. They are not going to destroy their own economy to help Iran.

Russia has almost no conventional military capabilities at all. They could easily be defeated by the Turkish or French military. Even their best, most battle ready divisions are not nearly up to Western standards. They will stick to picking on the Georgians.

banglacash 07-13-2008 07:36 PM

this is a useless poll. very low chance. sunnis don't like shitte countries. therefore, sunni nations like saudis, pakis and others are not a fan of iran to rally behind them.

stickyfingerz 07-13-2008 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14456339)
Are you serious ?????

Iran/Iraq war was a proxy war done by Iraq for the USA ....

As for missiles, what is the problem ???? Israel has none ? Israel doesn't do test, such as dry run for simulated bombings... Israel never attacked any countries, so they have no reason to be defensive ?

Saddam destroyed his Scuid ( in accordance with the UN inspection process ): look where it got him .. at the end of a rope ..

Now look at North Korea now .. They showed muscle, now they are getting retribution ...

Iran never attacked any countries .... but got their democracy san=botaged bu the USA to put their Shah PUPPET ....

He destroyed his scuid missles? Hmm interesting since I seem to recall them shooting some at us when we were attacking Iraq this time..

tony286 07-13-2008 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14456383)
He destroyed his scuid missles? Hmm interesting since I seem to recall them shooting some at us when we were attacking Iraq this time..

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/i...0-06-wmd_x.htm

directfiesta 07-13-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14456383)
He destroyed his scuid missles? Hmm interesting since I seem to recall them shooting some at us when we were attacking Iraq this time..

how about a link to those vicious unfounded scud attacks by the iraqis... maybe FauxNoise ....

Quote:

As yesterday's anti-war protest came to an end Saddam Hussein finally began scrapping his arsenal of banned missiles yesterday - continuing his extraordinary game of brinkmanship with George Bush and Tony Blair.

UN inspectors supervised the destruction of four al-Samoud 2 rockets - just hours before the deadline for scrapping the illegal arms passed.

The Iraqi president was ordered to destroy the missiles by UN chief weapons inspector Hand Blix last week. He told Saddam disarmament had to begin by yesterday.

The demand came after it emerged the al-Samoud, which is based on the design of the Russian Scud, can carry chemical and biological warheads more than 90 miles - the maximum range imposed after the 1991 Gulf War.

But yesterday's concession by Saddam was immediately dismissed by Britain's Tony Blair as "nowhere near enough". The Prime Minister said: "This falls a mile short of what he has to do, which is full disarmament. Where, for example are the thousands of tonnes of nerve gas agents which are unaccounted for?"

The move was hailed by chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix as a "significant piece of real disarmament." But Foreign Secretary Jack Straw attacked it as a "cynical trick".

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer went further. "The Iraqi actions are propaganda wrapped in a lie inside a falsehood," he said.

The first wave of missile scrapping came as the Turkish parliament backed the use of their land by US troops to launch attacks in Iraq.

But, as the Pope announced he was sending an envoy to Washington in a bid to avert war,

Agent 488 07-13-2008 08:21 PM

the rest of the world laughs as the US drains it's $$$ fighting these battles- just as the US did aa the soviets blew their load fighting afghanistan - so sad ...

Z 07-13-2008 08:59 PM

Oh come on people, we're already in a cold war.

dav3 07-14-2008 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14456352)
Funny how you guys supported , armed and financed terrorists against the liberating Soviet forces in Afghanistan ...

The US supplied stinger AA missiles were a deciding factor against Russia's attack choppers, which were mopping up the Afghanis.

Isn't this about the time bin laden became very friendly with the US gov?

Quote:

In 1986, the U.S. began shipping approximately 1,000 Stingers to the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan for use against Soviet aircraft. Approximately 270 Soviet aircraft were downed with these missiles(a 79 percent combat success rate). Unfortunately, many of these (and apparently other) Stingers in the hands of non-US users have been diverted to unfriedly hands. Stingers originally sent to the Afghan resistance appeared in Iran and were used for anti-aircraft defense for Iranian patrol boats. Other Stingers were captured by the Afghan Army and turned over to the Soviet Army.
http://www.nisat.org/weapons%20pages...ile_system.htm

rayadp05 07-14-2008 01:21 AM

I doubt that it would be a world war but I guess anything is possible.

webjoker 07-14-2008 03:39 AM


the only thing i'm afraid of is more 9/11 from other muslim groups as a response

David! 07-14-2008 07:18 AM

directfiesta is on fire, long live Fidel !!!:thumbsup

tranza 07-14-2008 07:52 AM

I don't think so!

dav3 07-14-2008 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webjoker (Post 14457210)

the only thing i'm afraid of is more 9/11 from other muslim groups as a response

Yes, especially another fanatical muslim group which has received support and weapons from the US Gov.

Rochard 07-14-2008 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14456356)
If you say so ...

Well, let's take a better look at this incident, shall we?

"The Taliban have largely shied away from large-scale attacks on foreign forces since suffering severe casualties in assaults on NATO bases in the south in 2006. Instead the militants have scaled up hit-and-run attacks and suicide and roadside bombs."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080714/ts_nm/afghan_violence_dc;_ylt=AsK4j18iX0BMqj4nJc9Nl8h34T 0D

We lost nine men and it's a huge set back? What kind of crack are you smoking?

Odin 07-14-2008 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14456331)
Iraq and Afghanistan is far from being a failure.... I love it when people call it a "war". It's not a war. A war when the armies of two governments fight each other. Seems to me that the governments we were once fighting are no longer in power. Now it's an occupation. What you have right now is terrorists attacking US troops.

I don't understand all of this talk about the US leaving. We went to war with these countries; We own them. We are still in Germany, Japan, and Korea. Pulling out of Iraq is the worst thing we can do; The moment we leave these terrorists will turn their attention fully on the new government of Iraq which will crumble, and then they'll focus their attention back on us - On the US mainland.

As for Iran.... Whatever. It will be another joke, the "mother of all battles" just like in Iraq. We have missiles we can launch from the US that hit Iran; We have planes they can't see and aircraft carriers off their coast. The president of Iran has less support than President Bush does. It will be more of what happened in Iraq; Their army will flee into the darkness and hide like cowards. And the missiles they just launched..... They have some decent range, but they aren't exactly accurate.

It would of been comical to see your response prior to the Iraq war. "US WILL RUN OVER SADDAM'S MILITARY AND OWN THE COUNTRY". Sadly it doesn't really work like that....

pornguy 07-14-2008 12:35 PM

If they go after Iran, it will be the largest invasion that has been seen in a LONG time. They could not risk losing the oil fields, and would want them fast.

_Richard_ 07-14-2008 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief (Post 14452335)
Wrong again. Think of it like this. If Saudi Arabia bombed the USA tomorrow, even with peoples dissatisfaction with Bush, what do you think the likely result would be? Would people rise up and overthrow the Government by force because a foreign (both in culture, religion and geography) enemy bombed them? Don't kid yourself. Zionists like yourself may try to deceive Americans of the reality of the situation, or perhaps you have been deceived yourself, but the reaction will be similar to that to Western support of a pro-Western Shah in Iran - the continued Islamization of the public. You're right that Iran has a large base of pro-Western youth, but bombing their nation will do nothing to strengthen their position, and almost inevitably will lead to the direct opposite. Remember when they said America would be welcomed as liberators?

No more wars for Israel.

um, from my conversations with a lot of iranians, they seem to want to get rid of the government

spacedog 07-14-2008 03:26 PM

WWIII started back in July, 2006
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/16/newt-world-war/

NEWT GINGRICH: "We’re in the early stages of what I would describe as the third World War"

I'm looking for the other one where George Bush also said we're entering WWIII also back in 2006

spacedog 07-14-2008 03:32 PM

K, guess it was earlier than July..

Here's article from May 2006 "Bush calls terror fight WWIII"
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117...-38198,00.html

crockett 07-14-2008 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14456320)
The USA threatens daily various countries .... and actually do aggress countries ... Iran hasn't done anything aside from blabbing ....

And Iran doesn't try to wrap itself in the blanket of purety as the USA tries to ...

Did you ever think that they could have fired those missiles to US irak bases ?

You do understand Iran is helping and supporting the insurgents in Iraq don't you? Granted I'm not a fan of Bush or the war but it have been 100% proven than Iran is supplying insurgents with weapons and possiably even training.

crockett 07-14-2008 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief (Post 14459040)
It would of been comical to see your response prior to the Iraq war. "US WILL RUN OVER SADDAM'S MILITARY AND OWN THE COUNTRY". Sadly it doesn't really work like that....

We did run over Saddams army we just had dipshits in charge that never planed on the running of the country once we took it over.

pocketkangaroo 07-14-2008 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 14459655)
You do understand Iran is helping and supporting the insurgents in Iraq don't you? Granted I'm not a fan of Bush or the war but it have been 100% proven than Iran is supplying insurgents with weapons and possiably even training.

And so does Saudi Arabia. Look at the harsh treatment we give them.

http://www.lrjjr.com/holding_hands_with_evil.jpeg

directfiesta 07-14-2008 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 14459655)
You do understand Iran is helping and supporting the insurgents in Iraq don't you? Granted I'm not a fan of Bush or the war but it have been 100% proven than Iran is supplying insurgents with weapons and possiably even training.

You remember that you did the same in Afghanistan against the liberation soviet forces ....


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123