Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
cykoe6: Let's summarize my "brainwashed" point of view:
1) Georgian army has attacked Russian peace keepers and South Ossetian civilians. The mentioned military operation "Clean Field" has caused a real humanity catastrophe. True or not?
|
This is true. There no doubt that Georgia attacked South Ossetian civilians with rockets and tanks and caused a large of amount of civilian causalities in an act of unnecessary aggression.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
2) Georgian army has been trained and equipped by USA and Israel. True or not?
|
This is also true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
3) A whole western media was keeping silence during all the time while Georgian army was slaughtering South Ossetian people, but it (western media) started screaming in unison about "Russian aggression" right when Russia came to South Ossetia in order to protect its citizens (hint: note the thread title). True or not?
|
True. The Western media's bias against Russia in this conflict has been shameful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
4) Today Saakashvili - the president of Geargia in presence of United States Secretary of State made a statement that his army hasn't attacked South Ossetia. He even told that Georgia was always helping the Ossetian people, but Russian army came to South Ossetia and destroyed Tshinvali, and Condoleezza hasn't pulled him up but just nodded assent to his words. True or not?
|
True. Saakashvili is a liar. He started the war by slaughtering South Ossetians and now he runs to the US to try and get himself out of the mess he created.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
5) CNN has showed pictures of destroyed Tshinvali and told it was Gori like it was bombed by Russian army. FOX was not happy when 12yo girl told the truth about Georgia. The program announcer even said something like: "Now you said that Russians wanted to hear". Personally to me that means that FOX hasn't wanted to show any objective info but only wanted to show something that "Russians don't want to hear" which is at least not ethical for a NEWS channel. Almost the same story with other western news channels. True or not?
|
True. The Western media's bias against Russia in this conflict has been shameful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
6) The target #1 for the USA is Iran and Iranian oil/gas. And the USA is preparing for a war against that country. True or not?
|
False. The US (along with Britain, France, Israel, Saudi Arabia and many others) are legitimately concerned about the potential consequences of Iran getting nuclear weapons. The US has no chance of seizing Iranian oil. In Iraq the US has spent billions of dollars, has received no oil and instead has paid $140 per barrel to import it. There have been no economic benefits of the invasion. The idea that the US went to war for oil is so absurd as to be laughable. Just look at the results. We have not siezed any Iraqi oil fields and we are paying 5 times as much to import oil. Furthermore no one is contemplating a ground invasion of Iran or an attempt to steal their oil fields. Obviously any military action against Iran will only increase the amount that the US must pay for oil when they import it.
That is why the US is trying to avoid a conflict. The facts are, however, that Israel has every reason to attack Iran to try and stop them going nuclear. Given the potential ramifications of such an attack then the US and the West has a lot of incentive to try and talk Iran down from the brink. Iran has stated many times that if they go nuclear they will attack Israel. Given this fact it can be assumed that Israel will attack first to try and stop that from happening. No matter what you think of Israel no one can expect them to just wait to be annihilated. Israel will attack first (as well they should, the Government of Israel has obligation to try and protect their people from extinction). Obviously the consequences will be horrible so that is the purpose to try and stop Iran from going nuclear while there is still time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
7) If there will be a straight war between the USA and Russia we all will end up with a nuclear catastrophe (what? I've said that again? ;)) True or not?
|
True. The US would never consider any military attack against Russia for obvious reasons. No one in the US has suggested otherwise. Even the hardest of the hawks has not said that their is any military option against Russia. An attack against nuclear armed Russia would be suicide. Who in the US is calling for war against Russia? All of the suggested moves have been diplomatic. Your repeated implications that the US is considering military actions against Russia are nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
8) Russia don't have any reason to expand its territory to other countries (e.g. Georgia, Ukraine and EU) just because there are no resources in those countries and following to a simple logic, such an expansion is irrational for a resource-rich Russia where is np energetic crisis and which is happy to sell oil and gas to other countries but don't give it away for free to feed any occupied territories. True or not?
|
False. Russia has many strategic reason to be interested in Georgia and the Ukraine. The primary interest in Georgia is the pipeline that runs from Azerbaijan though Georgia and Turkey. This is the only route for Caspian oil which does not go though Russia or Iran. By controlling this route Russia would have complete control over the regions oil supplies.
The strategic interest in the Ukraine is even more important. Ukraine has said that they will not renew the Russian's lease to allow the Russian fleet to use the port at Sevastopol in 2017. This would mean that there was no adequate place for The Russan Black Sea fleet to dock which, would mean that they could no longer control the Black Sea. Worse than that for Russia, if it becomes a NATO port then NATO would control the Black Sea. This is of HUGE strategic import to Russia.
I am sure you are aware of these strategic issues and only downplay them because they are inconvenient to your points.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
(Post 14614357)
9) Russia has no other way to protect their citizens and it's military operation was the only possible response to stop slaughtering people and decrease the death toll as it possible. True or not?
|
True. Russia had every right and a moral obligation to come to the aid of the South Ossetians (Russian citizens) who were being slaughtered by the Georgian military. The US and Israel should be ashamed to have been associated with a premeditated attack on civilians like that. The Western media's attempts to portray Russia as the aggressor and Georgia as the victim have been disgusting.