GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   McCain's choice for VP has slightly more experience in government than... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=851384)

TheDoc 08-30-2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14687892)
Isn't that being sexist?



No examples? Only example I can think of is Agnew's resignation but he was promptly replaced by Ford. I am pretty sure the law requires an appointment if the VP dies or steps down.

edit: Okay, when LBJ assumed office after Kennedy was killed he did not fill that vacancy. Will have to see how long that lasted.

I am logically sexist, yes - doesn't mean I don't think a women can't do the job, but having two women, for sure when one has no experience at running anything but the pta and the other is a total nut cast, I'm not being sexiest - I'm being logical.


From: http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...residency.html

25th Amendment: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

When Lyndon B. Johnson became president after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the position of vice president remained vacant for the remainder of his term. Had Johnson left office during that time, House Speaker John W. McCormack of Massachusetts would have been next in line to take his place as president. After Johnson won the 1964 election, his running mate, Hubert H. Humphrey, became vice president. A few years later, in Feb. 1967, the 25th amendment was ratified.

Vice President Spiro Agnew stepped down and was convicted of corruption charges after pleading "no contest." President Richard Nixon then appointed House Republican Leader Gerald Ford as vice president. When Nixon resigned and Ford became president, Ford named former New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller as his vice president.

baddog 08-30-2008 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14687933)
I am logically sexist, yes - doesn't mean I don't think a women can't do the job, but having two women, for sure when one has no experience at running anything but the pta and the other is a total nut cast, I'm not being sexiest - I'm being logical.

You are not really being logical. There is very little chance that a Republican VP that inherited the office of pres because of death (or any other reason) would pick the Democrat Speaker of the House. :2 cents:

Quote:

From: http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...residency.html

25th Amendment: Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

When Lyndon B. Johnson became president after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the position of vice president remained vacant for the remainder of his term. Had Johnson left office during that time, House Speaker John W. McCormack of Massachusetts would have been next in line to take his place as president. After Johnson won the 1964 election, his running mate, Hubert H. Humphrey, became vice president. A few years later, in Feb. 1967, the 25th amendment was ratified.

Vice President Spiro Agnew stepped down and was convicted of corruption charges after pleading "no contest." President Richard Nixon then appointed House Republican Leader Gerald Ford as vice president. When Nixon resigned and Ford became president, Ford named former New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller as his vice president.
Didn't I already cite those two examples?

TheDoc 08-30-2008 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14687949)
You are not really being logical. There is very little chance that a Republican VP that inherited the office of pres because of death (or any other reason) would pick the Democrat Speaker of the House. :2 cents:



Didn't I already cite those two examples?

Oh yes, not at all logical since the chain of command, is written in a way that she could get that power. And the President isn't the one that puts them into power, the Dem's that are in power could vote her in. Now, does that really sound like it's that far of a reach? I could see them being either stupid or retarded enough to do just that.


Did you ask me the question, post the answer, and ask me for the source?

baddog 08-30-2008 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14687980)
Oh yes, not at all logical since the chain of command, is written in a way that she could get that power. And the President isn't the one that puts them into power, the Dem's that are in power could vote her in. Now, does that really sound like it's that far of a reach? I could see them being either stupid or retarded enough to do just that.


Did you ask me the question, post the answer, and ask me for the source?

No, Congress can not vote her in if the President doesn't nominate her, and I am saying it is not logical to think a Republican president is going to nominate a Democrat [unless there was some major National scandal that resulted in impeachment, then maybe].

And you said there were many examples. I guess I was hoping you could provide more than the one I already provided.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123