GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   A good reason not to accept checks through CCBill (and other processors as well) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=854471)

MrAwesome 09-16-2008 12:32 PM

fuck this thread is like a ping pong game

Ben.Z 09-16-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmasterchecks (Post 14748401)
Wts ben or anyone, I respectfully ask you to correct any of the above

Sure. I will be happy to clarify some of the points in this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 14748342)
An e-check payment is "cleared" by the processor before the funds are withdrawn from the bank account which takes as long as 5 days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmasterchecks (Post 14748401)
you have to submit the check and wait for it to clear or bounce, which may take a week.


How ACH works -

ACH is a batch file system where the debit to the consumer?s account is initiated at any of the FED windows during a given banking day or on any subsequent banking day.

RDFI?s (the consumer?s bank) have 2 business days to return the item. Return reasons are things like insufficient funds, account closed, invalid accounts, etc. In addition, unauthorized returns (charge-backs) can come in later.

ACH items do not ?clear?. They are either returned by the RDFI or they are not.

webmasterchecks 09-16-2008 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTS - Ben (Post 14764140)
Sure. I will be happy to clarify some of the points in this thread.






How ACH works -

ACH is a batch file system where the debit to the consumer?s account is initiated at any of the FED windows during a given banking day or on any subsequent banking day.

RDFI?s (the consumer?s bank) have 2 business days to return the item. Return reasons are things like insufficient funds, account closed, invalid accounts, etc. In addition, unauthorized returns (charge-backs) can come in later.

ACH items do not ?clear?. They are either returned by the RDFI or they are not.

yea, i wasnt sure what to call a check that didnt get bounced back at its initial attempt
other than cleared :) thanks for coming in and clearing it up

Ben.Z 09-16-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmasterchecks (Post 14764230)
yea, i wasnt sure what to call a check that didnt get bounced back at its initial attempt
other than cleared :) thanks for coming in and clearing it up

No problem.:)

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmasterchecks (Post 14748401)
The problem with check processing is there there is no real-time clearinghouse where you can get an instant approval/denial on a user?.

Now you can do other checks to get an idea of if is a good user or not, but those are expensive/intrusive, when your dealing on a per transaction basis.

Real-time Verification ?

The top e-draw banks in the US, which represent about 70% of the checking and savings accounts in the US, participate in a system where they provide the account standing of every account in their system daily.

This system can tell the processor at the time of the transaction whether the account is in good standing or not. For instance, the system may say the account is closed, does not exist or is over drawn.

This system is not intrusive or I do not understand what you mean. It is completely transparent.

More importantly, it is not expensive for the merchant. It is included in our service.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14748409)
Walmart pretty much auto draws from your account when you pay with check. Star America or something like that is who they use.

I don't think this will be that big of an issue to protect from.

Real-time debits ?

These are POS (point of sale) transactions.

The consumer is present and the check is scanned for the MICR data. This is not available for non face-to-face transactions (Internet / Phone transactions).

dotcommer 09-17-2008 01:07 AM

Bump, we really need to get some good answers and upcoming solutions from third party billing companies.

aico 09-17-2008 01:17 AM

Solution: Don't give access until the funds have cleared. Put notice on the check join pages stating this, give option to go back and do credit card if they do not want to wait.

Ben.Z 09-17-2008 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webmasterchecks (Post 14748401)
Now, i observed that they enacted that roughly around the time of the change in nacha rules a while back (a deadline where NACHA required all the *real-bad* check return codes to be below 1%.)

Now, doing this A)costs a nice amount per transaction, because it costs to access the huge databases that can pull up background info on a wide range of people in a few seconds, and B) lowers throughput because who wants to give a porn site their Social Security or Drivers License #

Authentication and Fraud Prevention ?

WTS provides our TOAST authentication and fraud system as part of our service to our clients. We started doing this in 2005, well before the NACHA rule on charge-back ratios, so you are mistaken.

It is not SSN or Drivers License dependent, although these can be used.

This is also part of our service, so it is not an expense to the merchant.

All forms of fraud prevention and many network rules, including negative databases, credit checks, email verification, CVV, AVS, etc., are impediments to throughput. Processors do what they do to balance throughput against risk.


ACH Network Rules ?

The ACH Rules state that the Originator (processor) must authenticate the identity of the Receiver (consumer). This rule has been in effect since 2004.

We don?t know what others do, but one of our objectives is compliance with the Network rules. The methods we implement are in part what we have chosen in order to meet this goal.

StarkReality 09-17-2008 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14763188)
Checks only work for U.S. ip ranges, so they would have to get on a U.S. Ip. Or actually be an American, defrauding, on an easy to track ip, which I'm not worried about.

You can get lists of known proxies, I'm sure people sell them like they do geoip db's. If you are tracking returns, and this was going on, it wouldn't take long to figure out the IP ranges, hosts, areas, ect that are allowing this to happen and just block the IP's directly.

The main problem with excluding proxies is that many people surfing porn from work use them to hide their asses and get around filters...so banning them may destroy more business than it helps preventing fraud :2 cents:

TheDoc 09-17-2008 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTS - Ben (Post 14764252)
Real-time debits ?

These are POS (point of sale) transactions.

The consumer is present and the check is scanned for the MICR data. This is not available for non face-to-face transactions (Internet / Phone transactions).

Ahhh, understandable then. You learn something new every day. Thanks for the insight on how the online checking industry works.

Ben.Z 09-17-2008 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14768723)
Ahhh, understandable then. You learn something new every day. Thanks for the insight on how the online checking industry works.

Anytime. :)

TheDoc 09-17-2008 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StarkReality (Post 14768593)
The main problem with excluding proxies is that many people surfing porn from work use them to hide their asses and get around filters...so banning them may destroy more business than it helps preventing fraud :2 cents:

The technical level it takes for someone to find a working proxy and use the proxy, would clearly know they are being blocked because they are on a proxy. Then again, even higher skilled people can just setup a dns proxy in, well pretty quick, and it not be on any list.

I wouldn't personally block every proxy from the start. But by having a list of known proxies I could at least better monitor them.

It's limited all around but all fraud protection is at some level, but stacking them one on top of other makes the overall difference.

Ben.Z 09-17-2008 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 14748342)
- Turn off e-checking

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNRProductions (Post 14742578)
A good reason not to accept checks


Not Accepting Checks -

Not accepting ACH (checks) is a terribly uninformed suggestion! ACH is the second largest payment method for the majority of merchants.

You have to be either mathematically challenged or processing checks incorrectly for this to make sense. Luckily, these two problems have solutions.

Contact us if you need help with either. :winkwink:



CAM Sites, Live Feeds, etc. ?

Yes, a shameless pitch?

Merchants who have a higher cost of operation, additional risk and operate on a smaller margin can also accept checks safely and profitably.

WTS has a product designed specifically for these types of applications. Feel free to contact us for more details.

This is an easy way to add another 10% to your revenues!

DutchTeenCash 09-17-2008 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aussie Rebel (Post 14748406)
Surprise Surprise, AFF ads on a site teaching people how to rip off porn sites:Oh crap

would be nice if they suspended his acc

erraticimpact 10-03-2008 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTS - Ben (Post 14764252)
No problem.:)

Real-time debits ?

These are POS (point of sale) transactions.

The consumer is present and the check is scanned for the MICR data. This is not available for non face-to-face transactions (Internet / Phone transactions).


This has been available to Canadians for some time now and alot of gaming sites use it.
http://www.instadebit.com/

Preceding that for many years now we've been able to send what's called an Interac Email Money Transfer: http://www.interac.ca/consumers/prod...ces_ol_emt.php
and they also have realtime debit online as well http://www.interac.ca/consumers/prod...es_ol_main.php

Banks and such in the states need to hurryup and implement this, they're way behind :)

SNRProductions 10-03-2008 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTS - Ben (Post 14768515)
Authentication and Fraud Prevention ?

WTS provides our TOAST authentication and fraud system as part of our service to our clients. We started doing this in 2005, well before the NACHA rule on charge-back ratios, so you are mistaken.

It is not SSN or Drivers License dependent, although these can be used.

This is also part of our service, so it is not an expense to the merchant.

All forms of fraud prevention and many network rules, including negative databases, credit checks, email verification, CVV, AVS, etc., are impediments to throughput. Processors do what they do to balance throughput against risk.


ACH Network Rules ?

The ACH Rules state that the Originator (processor) must authenticate the identity of the Receiver (consumer). This rule has been in effect since 2004.

We don?t know what others do, but one of our objectives is compliance with the Network rules. The methods we implement are in part what we have chosen in order to meet this goal.

In other words, does that mean that you do not have the problem other processors do with online checks?

tony286 10-03-2008 04:28 PM

When I was with ibill I got tried of getting fucked in the ass on taking checks. It was awful.Then Gonzo told me about WTS and I started using them and they have been great. After using them I finally saw money from checks. When I switched to ccbill I didnt add checks because I was happy with wts. Knowing ccbill commitment to our industry I can see them taking action on this.

pigman 10-03-2008 06:39 PM

Scary shit!

Indecisive 10-03-2008 10:47 PM

Hit me up please Ben. Looks interesting. indy/teasingbucks/com

ParlourCash Karl 10-03-2008 10:56 PM

We got hit with this scam a few months ago and after trying to get it sorted out with our payment processor and not having any luck the only way we stopped it was by taking the check sign up off our payment options. We had the same group of people coming back every day as soon as they were taken of the members list. They were also just downloading non stop while they were on. Our processor tried loads of things but it did not work, hopefully they can all work together and get it sorted out now.

BV 10-03-2008 11:21 PM

You are stupid if you remove your check billing options.

http://www.bikinivoyeur.com/ccbill-checks.gif

DirtyDanza 10-04-2008 12:01 AM

it's been like this since I started in 2001


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123