Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 14960254)

The reason and FACTS for the statements made in those calls are in reference to Obama's voting record on crime bills.


Obama voted NO on extending the death penalty to include Gang murders.

Obama voted against a proposal making it a criminal offense for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang.

On a 1999 vote making adult prosecution mandatory for aggravated discharge of a firearm in or near a school, the senator voted ?present.?

And in 2001, Obama voted ?present? on a bill that would increase penalties for trafficking in Ecstasy and other designer drugs.

Senator Obama?s record on crime. It?s very, very weak when you look at many of the votes he cast in the Illinois State Senate, as well as in the United States Senate.

As far as protecting children, it refers to;

In 2001, Obama refused to support a bill restricting 'adult use' establishments by prohibiting locations of such establishments within 1000 feet of schools, parks, places of worship, preschools, day cares and other residential areas.

The articles related to this story conveniently fail to mention that the people whom walked off the job are all Obama supporters.

AmeriCall is a call center paid by various companies, corporations, etc that is hired to conduct calls, take survey's etc.. AmeriCall is NOT a McCain support organization.. AmeriCall was HIRED by the campaign because Indiana does not allow robocalls. The people whom walked off only did so because they're Obama supporters and nothing more!

Conveniently the articles also fail to include the entire script of the calls and puts their article out of context to distort the real truth.

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14960413)

Hmm, I seem to remember leaving because they were supporting a program that stole from an affiliate. Since that program no longer steals from affiliates, that is no longer true. Again, do you need pictures? Cuz, I am getting really tired of having to explain these simple concepts to you, eventually, you're going to have to be able to think on your own.

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 14960440)

The program stopped stealing, GFY did not stop supporting their theft. Two different things and the one you supposedly took the mighty stand against was GFY, not the program.

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14960457)

Learn to read, and comprehend, that's all I can say. Most of your idiotic comments stem from the fact that you seem to have trouble reading the words in front of you.

Find one place that I said GFY supported their theft, go ahead, I'll wait.

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14960429)

So you're telling me you don't know the difference between campaigning for someone, and reading a campaign script as part of a job?

I can't help you, I feel as though I have failed you, but sometimes, you just have to let go.

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 14959958)

Obama has a massive cock

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 14959931)

:1orglaugh
They're paid to do their job, not take a stand. Would you pay someone to not do what they were hired to do because they didn't want to do it, for whatever reason?

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 14960506)

Campaigning is campaigning, whether you are being paid to do it or not.

Originally Posted by gornyhuy (Post 14960587)

Jackass.

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14960597)

Yes it is, but what does that have to do with reading a campaign script?

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 14960611)

The operative word is "campaign." How is reading a campaign script for pay not campaigning? Because you're not doing out of the goodness of your heart?

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14960642)

The education system has failed you, I can see now that it's not your fault.

Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 14960683)

I see that life has failed you and turned you into a belligerent internet troll. If you weren't such a dick I'd feel sorry for you.

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14959978)

That will teach the fucktards republitards to outsource to India .... ( as every other good US corporate citizen ) :2 cents:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 14960668)

Should they have quit? Should they have sucked it up and done their job? That's not the main issue for me. What I find the most disgusting is the whole tactic of these types of calls themselves. I heard one of those robo-calls recently, played on a newscast. It was invasive, underhanded, propaganda-laden, and basically came off as being a scumbaggish thing to do. Those calls are illegal in some states, too bad they're not illegal in all of them. If you can't win an election without trashing your opponent, without bothering millions of people with "robo-calls", then I'm afraid you don't deserve to be the nation's leader.

I think it's a black mark on the republican party for doing it.

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 14962847)

Why doesn't anybody post links to their stories on this board?