GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Canucks - we're fucked...a call to action (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=873054)

JuiceMonkey 12-03-2008 11:01 AM

$1usd = $1.258

I don't think we're *that* fucked :)

starpimps 12-03-2008 11:37 AM

harper -> Bill C-16 for fixed election date.
harper calls election and fails, ends up still a minority with 37%.
harper -> pisses off every single party
63% of canada did not vote for conservatives so lets see what happens with the coalition.

I for one want a black dude to be prime minister but thats hard to do in canada since we only have kardinal offishall

Doctor Dre 12-03-2008 11:41 AM

I'm glad harper will be out of the top seat.

Martin 12-03-2008 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starpimps (Post 15137583)
harper -> Bill C-16 for fixed election date.
harper calls election and fails, ends up still a minority with 37%.
harper -> pisses off every single party
63% of canada did not vote for conservatives so lets see what happens with the coalition.

I for one want a black dude to be prime minister but thats hard to do in canada since we only have kardinal offishall


It's the Teeeeeee. Dot!

lol.:thumbsup

L0stMind 12-03-2008 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBR Richard (Post 15137170)
so everyone here is fine with the ruling party of Canada moving to bankrupt the opposition?

We're all clear on the fact that the only true 'attack' on democracy here is cutting the public funding of OUR parties.

I hate to explain to everyone exactly what the fuck democracy is, but Harper got elected on a Minority government. There is no, 'THE WHOLE COUNTRY VOTED FOR HARPER, THIS IS UNDEMOCRATIC'. there is NONE of that. The rest of the country voted for people that decided to get together and STOP Harper from creating his own special dictatorship.

I hate to be the one that says it, but cutting party funding in the middle of a global recession is a power grab. end of story.

Well, they cut the funding to their own party too and by the system, the conservatives stood to lose the most money. I think the conservatives stood to lose 10 million while the Liberals stood to lose $8m. But my numbers might be off, heard it on the news a couple weeks back.

The Sultan Of Smut 12-03-2008 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L0stMind (Post 15138213)
Well, they cut the funding to their own party too and by the system, the conservatives stood to lose the most money. I think the conservatives stood to lose 10 million while the Liberals stood to lose $8m. But my numbers might be off, heard it on the news a couple weeks back.

Ya but the percentage of what they spent that was accounted for by the funding was lower whereas that money was a lifeline for the other parties. As it is by eliminating that cash political diversity is ended since parties like the Green party won't ever be able to get a start and we'll be left with a crappy two party system full of wedge politics.

I might add that the Reform Party, Harper's old party, needed that money when it was a small movement. As it stands the Conservatives are the only party that can campaign after that money is gone and the Liberals will be bankrupt.

SilentKnight 12-03-2008 05:57 PM

I found it pathetically laughable to sit and wait tonight while Dion and the other idiots attempted to get their taped speeches to the national news as a follow-up to Harper's earlier speech to the nation.

The man who wants to be Prime Minister and the leader of our country can't even deliver a fucking tape to a news outlet on time. And then when it finally shows up close to half an hour late (they aired it on CTVNews.net station) - its out-of-focus and tightly cropped to make him look further like a buffoon.

This is the level of leadership you can expect from this coalition - incompetence.

$300 million for another election - versus - pumping billions in to Quebec to keep Duceppe and company appeased. And billions more handed to the autoworkers to keep Layton happy.

And who knows how much we'll fork over to enroll Dion in an 'Engrish as a second language" refresher course.

Its a no-brainer which of the evils I'm willing to accept.

Unbelievable.

ottyhotties 12-03-2008 06:15 PM

I think Harper is playing political poker.

He wants them to take parliament because he knows the next several months will be bad. Liberals not the conservatives will get the blame. And should the gamble pay off this has the makings of creating a majority conservative government with wide margins in the next Canadian elections. Perhaps putting liberals into a minority for generations to come.

Socks 12-03-2008 06:26 PM

Lets not forget that what is now the Conservative Party of Canada was once a bunch of conservative parties that merged to take on the liberals. It's history repeating itself on the other side.

From Wikipedia:

The Canadian Alliance (in French Alliance Canadienne), formally the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance (or in French Alliance réformiste-conservateur Canadienne), was a Canadian conservative political party that existed from 2000 to 2003. The party was the successor to the Reform Party of Canada and inherited its position as the Official Opposition in the House of Commons and held it throughout its existence. The party supported policies that were both fiscally and socially conservative, seeking reduced government spending on social programs and reductions in taxation.

The Alliance was created out of the United Alternative initiative launched by the Reform Party and several provincial Tory parties as a vehicle to merge with the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. The federal PC Party under Joe Clark rebuffed the initiative to "unite the right". In December 2003, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative parties voted to disband and merge into the Conservative Party of Canada.

SilentKnight 12-03-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 15139479)
Lets not forget that what is now the Conservative Party of Canada was once a bunch of conservative parties that merged to take on the liberals. It's history repeating itself on the other side.

From Wikipedia:

The Canadian Alliance (in French Alliance Canadienne), formally the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance (or in French Alliance réformiste-conservateur Canadienne), was a Canadian conservative political party that existed from 2000 to 2003. The party was the successor to the Reform Party of Canada and inherited its position as the Official Opposition in the House of Commons and held it throughout its existence. The party supported policies that were both fiscally and socially conservative, seeking reduced government spending on social programs and reductions in taxation.

The Alliance was created out of the United Alternative initiative launched by the Reform Party and several provincial Tory parties as a vehicle to merge with the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. The federal PC Party under Joe Clark rebuffed the initiative to "unite the right". In December 2003, the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative parties voted to disband and merge into the Conservative Party of Canada.

While you may be correct on the history of the current Conservative party - the big difference between the merging of the Reform Party and factions of the remaining Conservative Party (not to forget the CRAP party under Stockwell Day; sic) - is the merger/alliance DID NOT INCLUDE SEPARATISTS.

Also - the Conservative/Reform merger took place before the subsequent election and ran with a platform that was widely promoted to Canadians prior to the election.

This unholy triumvirate has no such platform. Their agenda is completely unknown to Canadians.

Tickler 12-03-2008 09:18 PM

:2 cents:Why don't people get it that Harper was NOT voted by a majority to be Prime Minister. A minority government has to work along with other parties to get things done. Harper is not willing to do that, so how about we let the other people with more votes get together to do it. All this BS about stealing the government is plain garbage.

Lots of the countries around the world use the parlimentary demoncracy model, and it works quite well.

Harper is bitching and calling names about "separatists", but he made the identical arrangements with the NDP & the Bloc a few years ago to do the exact same thing. He also worked with the Bloc to support his minority governments to keep himself in power, but now they are apparently the nasty folks. BTW, Stockwell Day did the same thing a few years earlier.

Anybody besides me wonder how come Harper has a tape of a NDP phone conversation. One of the reporters tried to ask about it tonight in an interview but got no response. I guess big brother is probably taping all phone calls & opening all the mail. Sure starting to sound like Watergate.

ps. SilentKnight: I used to have to go to Harpers' conservative Alberta all the time in the '80s to the companies regional offices for systems stuff. They kept telling me that I would soon need a passport because they planned on seperating. So are all these western conservatives separatists also.

SilentKnight 12-03-2008 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickler (Post 15140030)

ps. SilentKnight: I used to have to go to Harpers' conservative Alberta all the time in the '80s to the companies regional offices for systems stuff. They kept telling me that I would soon need a passport because they planned on seperating. So are all these western conservatives separatists also.

Talking/musing about separation is a far cry from actively pursuing and promoting it as Parizeau and Duceppe have been doing all along.

Many Canadians often lament, "Hell, just let Quebec leave and get it done with," but when it comes down to the cold light of day they'd vote to keep Quebec for the sake of a unified country.

Z 12-03-2008 11:05 PM

At least Americans aren't the only ones getting fucked by their government...

OnSpec 12-04-2008 05:22 AM

Where's Phil Fontaine when you need him?

Fabien 12-04-2008 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBR Richard (Post 15137170)
so everyone here is fine with the ruling party of Canada moving to bankrupt the opposition?

We're all clear on the fact that the only true 'attack' on democracy here is cutting the public funding of OUR parties.

I hate to explain to everyone exactly what the fuck democracy is, but Harper got elected on a Minority government. There is no, 'THE WHOLE COUNTRY VOTED FOR HARPER, THIS IS UNDEMOCRATIC'. there is NONE of that. The rest of the country voted for people that decided to get together and STOP Harper from creating his own special dictatorship.

I hate to be the one that says it, but cutting party funding in the middle of a global recession is a power grab. end of story.

I didn't want to jump in this but :mad:

Looks like you don't have a slight idea on how this works huh ?
YOU ARE PAYING ALL the parties with your TAXES. That includes the fucking "Bloc Québecois à marde"
They receive close to 2$ per votes, per YEAR !

Also, if the Liberals and the NPD don't get as much as Harper, guess why ? That's because people DON'T WANT THEM TO RECEIVE DA MONEY ! Period.
Don't forget that Harper would get it in the ass too, like all the other parties so what's the deal ?

Why would we fund parties ? Now you tell me !

Jman 12-04-2008 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 15136930)
what, do they really think they can survive as an independent nation? (I mean, the people from Quebec)

You'd be surprise... We have soo many natural resource here we'd bank on selling electricity to the rest of Canada.

I think this coalition might be a good thing for the province of Quebec but with that said I'm not a separatist as I consider myself Canadian and not Quebecois.

Jman 12-04-2008 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starpimps (Post 15137583)
harper -> Bill C-16 for fixed election date.
harper calls election and fails, ends up still a minority with 37%.
harper -> pisses off every single party
63% of canada did not vote for conservatives so lets see what happens with the coalition.

I for one want a black dude to be prime minister but thats hard to do in canada since we only have kardinal offishall

Maybe we could have an Inuit as Prime Minister... At least the seals would be safe :upsidedow

Fabien 12-04-2008 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jean-Francois (Post 15141337)
You'd be surprise... We have soo many natural resource here we'd bank on selling electricity to the rest of Canada.

I think this coalition might be a good thing for the province of Quebec but with that said I'm not a separatist as I consider myself Canadian and not Quebecois.

Ok fine, then WHY THE FUCK AREN'T THEY DOING IT RIGHT NOW !
Like if Québec gets the fuck out of Canada, prosperity will arrive. Just like that. Bang.

Fact: Québec is DEAD last in Canada now for almost everything.
Fact: For years now, Québec receives over 8 000 000 000/YEAR (that's 8 billions) from the rich provinces.

Ostie qu'on est cave

yys 12-04-2008 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jean-Francois (Post 15141337)
You'd be surprise... We have soo many natural resource here we'd bank on selling electricity to the rest of Canada.

Better then 50-50 that those dams wouldn't be in Quebec if they left. that land was ceded to Quebec as part of Canada and you can damn well bet the majority of ROC would want it back. You guys could bitch all you want but 20+ million would be calling the shots; not the 3-4 million in Quebec.



You hear this shit on the TV? If I have to hear one more Quebecer complain about the divisiveness of Harpers words and the damage that he is doing to national unity I'm going to throw up! Quebecers are the ones who sent a party dedicated to the destruction of Canada to Ottawa. Hows that for divisive and bad for unity. It was like sticking your fucking fingers in the ROC's eye and expecting people to say thank you. I wonder what you guys would think if we elected a party who's sole purpose was to break present day Quebec into pieces. I bet not a single one of them would say its perfectly fine and thats democracy; they'd be up in arms and rightly so.

Dion is a fucking idiot for handing the BQ and PQ this win win situation and somebody in his party better step in to stop this shit. These guys will end up in the history bin like the PC party if they get away with this shit.

the alchemist 12-04-2008 09:38 AM

Fabien nailed it.

Everyone seems to think that Canada is a democracy, which it isn't, it's a constitutional monarchy... What is happening now pisses me off more than I can tell, but it's not a surprise, far from it. It has nothing to do with Harper's decisions, it's simply a very poorly thought move to try and grab the power, with the Bloc sticking it's nose where it doesn't belong, again. Our future is in the hands of an ex tv host from Quebec, and the Queen, there's not much we can do to change anything at this point. This is just the perfect example of why we should do our best to go toward a democratic presidential system, even if there's very little chance of that happening. My only hope is that Canadians actually stick together in this time of crisis.

Fabien 12-04-2008 11:25 AM

Exactly what i think.
We are not alone.
Radiopirate.com go there and you'll find a hole bunch of "lucides" like us.


stie :1orglaugh

Fabien 12-04-2008 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yys (Post 15141788)
Better then 50-50 that those dams wouldn't be in Quebec if they left. that land was ceded to Quebec as part of Canada and you can damn well bet the majority of ROC would want it back. You guys could bitch all you want but 20+ million would be calling the shots; not the 3-4 million in Quebec.



You hear this shit on the TV? If I have to hear one more Quebecer complain about the divisiveness of Harpers words and the damage that he is doing to national unity I'm going to throw up! Quebecers are the ones who sent a party dedicated to the destruction of Canada to Ottawa. Hows that for divisive and bad for unity. It was like sticking your fucking fingers in the ROC's eye and expecting people to say thank you. I wonder what you guys would think if we elected a party who's sole purpose was to break present day Quebec into pieces. I bet not a single one of them would say its perfectly fine and thats democracy; they'd be up in arms and rightly so.

Dion is a fucking idiot for handing the BQ and PQ this win win situation and somebody in his party better step in to stop this shit. These guys will end up in the history bin like the PC party if they get away with this shit.

Can you imagine, almost one out of 2 voted for the "Bloc Québecois" in Québec but when they are asked if they want to seperate, 1/3 only votes for it :1orglaugh
Bunch of assholes.

Soon i'll get the fuck out TABARNAKE before the entire boat sinks !

_Richard_ 12-04-2008 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fabien (Post 15141205)
I didn't want to jump in this but :mad:

Looks like you don't have a slight idea on how this works huh ?
YOU ARE PAYING ALL the parties with your TAXES. That includes the fucking "Bloc Québecois à marde"
They receive close to 2$ per votes, per YEAR !

Also, if the Liberals and the NPD don't get as much as Harper, guess why ? That's because people DON'T WANT THEM TO RECEIVE DA MONEY ! Period.
Don't forget that Harper would get it in the ass too, like all the other parties so what's the deal ?

Why would we fund parties ? Now you tell me !

in order to keep those parties not only in existance, but under the control of the entire country? this isn't a motion that is to be passed, it should be a referendum of the entire country deciding if we want public funding, and public control, of our national parties.

furthermore, it isn't so much the major parties, but what about the smaller parties that needs these funs to not only come into existence, but stay as a power?

even the conservatives themselves are ripping each other apart for doing something THIS stupid.

this guy is supposed to be fixing the economy, not tearing the country apart.

_Richard_ 12-04-2008 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iMind (Post 15137397)
I don't think he honestly planned to at all, I think it was a plot to force the plan for a coup into the house floor... he knew it was going on, so brought up an issue that KNEW would bring it to light.

Once they did, he agreed to drop it

Seriously, check out how much tax money goes into that, the $$ amount is pennies in the actual budget haha .. so minute that it HAD to be just to start a shitstorm.

that is a possibility, but there is other ways to out a possible coup than to give those conspirators REAL reason to be pissed off.

He proposed this without the backing of his own party. Mr. Sled-dog himself would have had kittens if he was opposition fighting this.

Lets get back to the jobs and money we're losing.

_Richard_ 12-04-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L0stMind (Post 15138213)
Well, they cut the funding to their own party too and by the system, the conservatives stood to lose the most money. I think the conservatives stood to lose 10 million while the Liberals stood to lose $8m. But my numbers might be off, heard it on the news a couple weeks back.

i would have to look the numbers up, but i find myself dismissing the importance; due to the fact that they would be in power while the others lose the necessary funding to make our government functional.

someone has already said, this is chump change. They could cancel just one military project to far offset this cost.

_Richard_ 12-04-2008 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yys (Post 15137403)
What Dion is doing isn't? This fuck nut who has already announced he is stepping down as liberal leader, wants to be PM for 5-6 months. Then he will be replaced by 'who knows who' for another two years. In the meantime he has managed to legitimize the Bloc in Ottawa and has them grinning from ear to ear . Handed the PQ some electoral life in the Quebec elections. Jack Layton gets the only hope his party has of ever getting a sniff at being in the federal government. Elizabeth May gets to join the Senate for life. All so Dion can be PM for 5-6 months and the Liberals who suffered their worst defeat in history get to regain power.


Harper played politics and got bitch slapped for it. He backed down and now its the oppositions turn to back the fuck down.

i disagree with you regarding Dion, and your argument that he's legitimizing the Bloc. Pulling the bloc into the federal government is necessary to include an element of Quebec that i believe has become misguided and slightly hypocritical. Quebec is as necessary to Canada as the the people in the west, and at least they vote not knowing who won.

I DO agree that the opposition should now back down. They will gain nothing with the point dropped from the budget, and this sends a clear message to the ruling minority that we won't be fucked with. No gay marriage issue, no abortion issue, no dictatorship.

cheryl666 12-04-2008 11:56 AM

danger!!!...... we will just have to wait and see

yys 12-04-2008 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBR Richard (Post 15142925)
i disagree with you regarding Dion, and your argument that he's legitimizing the Bloc. Pulling the bloc into the federal government is necessary to include an element of Quebec that i believe has become misguided and slightly hypocritical. Quebec is as necessary to Canada as the the people in the west, and at least they vote not knowing who won.

Too bad the separatists don't agree with you. They have said this will remove any doubt that the Bloc in Ottawa is not a good thing for Quebec sovereignty; it legitimizes them. They have already came out and said this is the exact purpose they saw for the Bloc when it was created. To create a dysfunctional parliament; a pizza parliament.

Just a few snippets of what they've been saying
Quote:

“This victory sweeps aside any hesitation Quebecers might have had on the presence of the Bloc in Ottawa,” Mr. Parizeau said.

“We have to be pragmatic and understand Mr. Dion is there for a mere five months,” Mr. Parizeau

Now he urges Quebecers to get out and vote for the PQ Dec. 8 to “create a team able to defend Quebec’s interests solidly and without compromise.”
“I think we are nibbling away [at the Liberal lead],” one top PQ official said.

Now he's back with a brutally timed piece in a Quebec paper heaping praise on the Dion coalition because it will be a dysfunctional "Italian-style parliament."

"Quebec sovereignty is once again the order of the day," Parizeau whooped.

And the Dion deal will "make separatists smile."


Parizeau predicted in 1991 that the Bloc would create a chaotic "Italian-style parliament" in Ottawa, a place so dysfunctional that it would help lead to the breakup of Canada.
Dion is a fucking idiot for opening this door up. Harper might have been knocking but make no mistake, Dion is the one who opened this unity door by forming a coalition with the Bloc.


Not one person voted on this coalition. In fact Dion said he would never form one and Layton said the same. Dion will lead his party to a massive defeat like the PC's were dealt in '93. People on their side are dreaming in technicolor if they think aligning with the NDP and Bloc won't boost the Cons numbers They'll grab an extra 8%-10% in an election and that would relegate the Liberals to the basement.

Quote:

I DO agree that the opposition should now back down. They will gain nothing with the point dropped from the budget, and this sends a clear message to the ruling minority that we won't be fucked with. No gay marriage issue, no abortion issue, no dictatorship.
You are delusional if you thought Harper was going to open up gay marriage and abortion debates. Those battles have been fought and are history.

wyldblyss 12-04-2008 12:47 PM

We're doomed.

CDSmith 12-04-2008 12:50 PM

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics...632741-cp.html
Quote:

NDP Leader's mom upset at tories
OTTAWA - NDP Leader Jack Layton's mother is incensed after a Conservative cabinet minister suggested her late husband must be "spinning in his grave" over a proposed coalition between New Democrats, Liberals and the Bloc Quebecois.

Doris Layton called The Canadian Press to vent after hearing Senator Marjory LeBreton's take on the political meltdown threatening the Conservative minority government.
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics...632741-cp.html
Shemp is right, this really IS entertaining political drama. :D

starpimps 12-04-2008 12:55 PM

http://adviking.files.wordpress.com/...e_canada_1.jpg

yys 12-04-2008 01:02 PM

Lets add that the coalition claims to have formed because we need economic stimulus right now. If they were to defeat the government next week as they had planned the earliest they would have been able to present an economic stimulus package would have been in late February; more likely late March.

First they would have to go to the GG, then we're closed down until January for Christmas break. In January they would have to form their cabinet and then go to the GG for permission to form the new government. Then it would take 6-8 weeks for them to take over from the ruling Conservatives. That puts us into late February for the earliest they could introduce their stimulus package.

What would be in the stimulus package? We don't know and neither do they. They say to wait for when they are in power for specific details. They will have to consult their ?four wise men,?economic panel they are setting up. But wait, their so called superstar economic panel doesn't exist.

Quote:

If Stephen Harper had not delayed the confidence vote until next week, Stephane Dion and his co-conspirators, including the Quebec separatists, would have taken power. The plotters tried to ease the concerns of frightened Canadians by indicating that Jack Layton's NDP socialists would not control the purse strings.
Knowing that Canadians would never agree to the NDP in control of the economy, but also realizing that his partners would never accept being frozen out of key cabinet positions, Stephane Dion and the Liberals tried to square the circle by going outside of parliament for economic advice:

Known informally as the ?four wise men,? Roy Romanow, Frank McKenna, Paul Martin and John Manley have agreed to form a body of economic advisers in the event of the formation of a Liberal-NDP coalition government.
If everything goes according to script, the quartet will draw comparisons to the team assembled south of the border by U.S. president-elect Barack Obama, who has called on experienced hands to help him deal with the financial crisis.

Now it turns out there was no agreement. John Manley and Frank McKenna have not agreed, and in fact, have explicitly said they want no part of this:

Frank McKenna has decided he will not participate in the advisory panel, sources close to the former New Brunswick premier indicated last night, citing his commitments to the TD Bank, where he serves as deputy chairman.
Mr. McKenna was asked to join a group that would reportedly include former Saskatchewan New Democrat premier Roy Romanow, former Liberal finance minister John Manley and former prime minister Paul Martin. The panel was apparently inspired by the economic transition team assembled by U.S. president-elect Barack Obama.
Mr. Manley's involvement is now also uncertain.
"I haven't agreed to do anything," he said in an email to the Citizen last night. "I have the view that I should be available when called upon by the government for public service, but I do not know what this panel is supposed to do and I have not been asked to be part of something."

And Roy Romanow? According to his wife, he was surprised to discover he'd been asked to be a member of the panel. Only Paul Martin seems to be in. Four wise men is now one has-been. One report indicated the whole thing was an attempt to protect confidence in the coalition's economic acumen by diverting attention from the participation of the NDP.
I guess they have reason to be concerned. If the plan was to keep the NDP marginalized in cabinet, at least economically, then there would not have been any reason to imagine this advisory panel.
If the confidence vote had happened on Monday, we would be learning the truth about this non-existent panel too late.
Prorogue parliament. Canadians need time to learn what other lies are lurking behind the words and promises of the separatist coalition.
A bunch of lies from a corrupt party that can't stand not being in power led by a man so soundly rejected by Canadians, worst Liberal showing in their history, that his party has already asked him to step down and he's agreed. Now we get him as PM for 5 months and then some unnamed Liberal for 2 years after he steps down.

If they end up in power I will donate the maximum allowed under the law to help ensure they don't get elected in my area. I've already spoken with some people who run elections for Liberals in my area, Mississauga, and they are feeling the heat for this deal and know it will be a disaster the next electoral go around.

Hopefully the Liberal MP's wise up and tell the lame duck Dion to get the F out now.

Socks 12-04-2008 01:04 PM

What offends me about this whole thing is that the ONLY FUCKING THING that brought this about was an attack on the POLITICAL PARTIES????

Let's take a step back here...

If they decide to blow billions of dollars on stuff the Canadian public is outraged over, nobody cares.

If we're getting gauged at the pumps, corporations are fleecing us, all the banks are cashing in multi billion profits every 3 months - nobody does a fucking thing.

How about our offensive dairy board that inflates the prices of all dairy products by 2-3x normal, totally fucking the poor people of Canada, then also insures foreign producers face 300% tariffs to stop them from importing and competing... Nothing from these assholes.

But fuck with the money on their table, and they're ready to bring Canada to its knees via political ridiculousness? Sad really. Just shows you where their true values lie - in giving jobs to their families.

SilentKnight 12-04-2008 04:15 PM

I find it very interesting that even Ignatiuf is attempting to distance himself from this coalition crap.

Hardly a peep from him lately.

starpimps 12-04-2008 06:54 PM

i fucked harpers wife..he is mad

johnontilt 12-04-2008 07:24 PM

more people voted against Harper than they did for him, so no crying that this coalition gov isn't fair because that is not what the people voted for.

L0stMind 12-04-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnontilt (Post 15145753)
more people voted against Harper than they did for him, so no crying that this coalition gov isn't fair because that is not what the people voted for.

Absolutely correct in that more people voted against then for Harper. But what no one voted on and what is making most of us sane people mad about is that we are facing the possibility of a ruling party coming in with a platform that we've never even heard of!

I guarantee that if the Coalition had campaigned as a Coalition with no public agenda or platform, we'd have a majority Conservative government right now.

My problem is not with the fact that there is a potential Coalition government, my problem is that I don't know what they stand for other then some very vague promises to help the auto and forestry industries - both of which are poor industries to prop up imho. Put the money elsewhere, where it can do some good.

chodadog 12-04-2008 09:44 PM

This is democracy in action. Unless one party can form a majority government on their own, then a coalition government can step in and take power. If they've got the votes, they've got the right.

It's especially necessary when the largest party refuses to cooperate with other parties when they're in a minority government. If you're in a minority government, you have to play ball. If you don't, then this is what happens. Canada is awesome.

[db] 12-04-2008 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L0stMind (Post 15135129)
I feel that somehow democracy has failed. We just voted a platform/party into power because the other platforms were not what we wanted.

No, WE didn't. YOU tried to, but YOU failed. Harper has a minority government, and he can only govern with the confidence of the parliament, which is who WE elected. 62% of people voted for the opposition parties. The current parliament has a majority of left wing MPs.

Harper proposes a confidence motion, confidence motion fails, government is toppled. This is elementary civics people, read a fucking book before crying about your lunatic evangelicals not being able govern like they are a majority when they are in fact a very very weak minority.

The ignorance of some Canadians on basic civic issues is astounding.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc