GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Dear Playboy.com ::: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=877147)

JFK 12-22-2008 02:20 PM

Fitty..............Dear Playboy's :Graucho

John-ACWM 12-22-2008 02:49 PM

You know best. Enjoy the holidays!

Eric 12-22-2008 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...with little to no regard for color correcting or enhancing the footage. My CaptureGirls HD footage looks 20 times better then most of the footage on Playboy.com and I'm a one-man operation. I shoot it, edit it, color correct it and enhance it all myself. Does it take money? No! It simply takes having pride in your work...that's all! If I can do this - surely Playboy can do this!

By the way, I'm available for consultations if Playboy needs my services :winkwink: My clients don't do business with me because I'm cheap.....they do business with me because I have an eye for quality and I take pride in my work. This is something that seems to be sorely lacking with my friends at Playboy.com :Oh crap

Eric, is there anyone you can forward this thread to that gives a damn about the quality of the content on Playboy.com?

Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

JFK 12-22-2008 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15233906)
Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

Congrats on the 7K:thumbsup

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15233906)
Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

Eric, why do they call you Tender Thighs? :winkwink:

Congrats on 7000 posts! And, congrats on your free-speech comment earlier. And, congrats on your new position with Playboy. And, congrats on having Jelena as a girlfriend (hot-hot-hot). Sounds like this may be your best year ever :thumbsup

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 12-22-2008 07:32 PM

You tell em Dean... For the, how many thread so far, time.. You are right and they should give you a job...

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 15234493)
You tell em Dean... For the, how many thread so far, time.. You are right and they should give you a job...

Giving me a job won't solve their issues....I'm perfectly happy doing what I'm doing. I don't think I'd do very well in the corporate world. I'd end up telling someone to go fuck themselves and I'd be right back where I am now. Shooting some of the hottest girls in the industry for some of the largest and most successful websites in the world. I got a nice life, don't need Playboy for anything :thumbsup

Si 12-22-2008 07:43 PM

This thread delivers
http://420.thrashbarg.net/this_threa...ick_amazon.jpg

Nurgle 12-22-2008 07:44 PM

Dean your right.. without Arny and Steve, the quality of Playboy is poor to say the least.. I cant believe some of the poor pics for the Playmates they are doing in the "extras" each month, i sometimes think I could get my throw away camera and produce better pics, and i have no fucking idea how to take a photo. When u have girls that are soooo fucking hot, one needs to give them the quality output they deserver

good thread!

Marcus Aurelius 12-22-2008 07:47 PM

Glad to see some changes coming down the pipe. And I agree with dean, she is not hideous but that shot is not flattering.

tony286 12-22-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mobilefun1987 (Post 15234532)

my ups person has never looked like that.:(

dexternax 12-22-2008 07:55 PM

My best friend just got a job at Playboy... Today was his first day actually... He's gonna be the one sorting through the good and bad pics... I just showed him this thread :)

he said 'ok'... ill see what i can do

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dexternax (Post 15234571)
My best friend just got a job at Playboy... Today was his first day actually... He's gonna be the one sorting through the good and bad pics... I just showed him this thread :)

he said 'ok'... ill see what i can do

Just out of curiosity, does your friend have any experience with photography? What is his background? What makes him qualified to be a photo editor? Just curious.....

Manowar 12-22-2008 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mobilefun1987 (Post 15234532)

i could 'deliver' into that girl

MaDalton 12-22-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15234575)
Just out of curiosity, does your friend have any experience with photography? What is his background? What makes him qualified to be a photo editor? Just curious.....

i'm afraid i know the answer already

dexternax 12-22-2008 08:10 PM

Yeah he's very good. He has a good eye. Educated in photography. He worked for one of the biggest commercial studios here in Chicago. He knows what he's doing... I've been friends with him for a long time now... he has a good eye for beautiful girls. He's gonna be running around doing casting stuff too.

dexternax 12-22-2008 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 15234595)
i'm afraid i know the answer already

Haha have no fear :)

seeric 12-22-2008 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15232278)
Wrong, you are thinking in terms of how the old administration dealt with things.

We are under a new regime! Free speech is back

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thum bsup

in the end, they're just words. glad to see that got through to people.

tender bones for the win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dexternax (Post 15234613)
Yeah he's very good. He has a good eye. Educated in photography. He worked for one of the biggest commercial studios here in Chicago. He knows what he's doing... I've been friends with him for a long time now... he has a good eye for beautiful girls. He's gonna be running around doing casting stuff too.

Well good luck to your friend. Hopefully he'll make a difference.

JayAllan 12-22-2008 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...

Dean,

They don't have anyone over there that cares about quality. In fact, there is almost no-one in this entire industry that cares about quality. Playboy's Video has been pathetic for many years. Back in the day they actually used mainstream directors and cinematographers to capture quality. But that ended in the early 90s. They didn't want to pay for it. Hugh appreciates quality and has always been a big supporter of artists. They have been showcased through the years in the magazine and even lived at the mansion. Painters, writers, photographers, filmmakers. But he does not care anymore and is not making those decisions. :( Its also too big a corporation now. There are many fearful people working there who are afraid for their jobs and are scared to change. I see it all the time.

Don't worry. Quality work will always rise to the top and there will always be a place for it. High end photography, and more so video, in these industry will be coming in a big way after this recession. With the tech that is coming out now we are in a position to do some stuff in adult that has never been seen before. This will sell.

It is a lot harder to sell Ferraris than it is to sell Honda Civics, and you can sell a lot more Hondas, but I would rather sell a few Ferraris personally. And hey, there is less competition at the top :2 cents:

DWB 12-22-2008 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232930)
I'm not an artist with words - I just say what I feel :thumbsup

As the great Steve Martin once said, "Some people have a way with words and some people... just don't... have a way... with... words."

DWB 12-22-2008 08:55 PM

Oh... and let me add...

Until Playboy starts putting trannies under their wing, they can expect continued quarterly losses.

seeric 12-22-2008 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 15234744)
Oh... and let me add...

Until Playboy starts putting trannies under their wing, they can expect continued quarterly losses.

considering that a massive percentage of my tranny customers are straight males, i would tend to agree with you on that.

Chit Chat 12-22-2008 09:18 PM

http://www.funnyforumpics.com/forums...rs/1/atlas.jpg

Mutt 12-22-2008 09:30 PM

Dean you're correct but it won't happen - tough economic times for one and Playboy in particular is struggling - they have spread themselves too thin - when all they had to take care of was the magazine, quality was easy to achieve. Now they have a website that demands many times the amount of content that the magazine takes - plus Special Editions magazines, plus a bunch of other paysites. Quality of model and content goes down. Ask any webmaster who owns a paysites with large numbers of models and photographers, Shap/Kim/Louis/BillNubiles/Met-Art etc - how hard it is to maintain quality control.

Hef's pick for the 55th anniversary Playmate is bizarre.

PMGames 12-22-2008 09:36 PM

wow....what have I been missing out on all this time. lol. :)

tony286 12-22-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15234849)
Dean you're correct but it won't happen - tough economic times for one and Playboy in particular is struggling - they have spread themselves too thin - when all they had to take care of was the magazine, quality was easy to achieve. Now they have a website that demands many times the amount of content that the magazine takes - plus Special Editions magazines, plus a bunch of other paysites. Quality of model and content goes down. Ask any webmaster who owns a paysites with large numbers of models and photographers, Shap/Kim/Louis/BillNubiles/Met-Art etc - how hard it is to maintain quality control.

Hef's pick for the 55th anniversary Playmate is bizarre.

I was surprised by his pick also.

Iron Fist 12-22-2008 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15232503)
I have a penis, girls have a vagina.. :thumbsup

After 20,000 posts... you might be on to something there. Keep up the good work. :thumbsup

NaughtyRob 12-22-2008 10:41 PM

Dean why are you trying so hard to get banned? Just wondering.

JaneB 12-22-2008 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15234881)
I was surprised by his pick also.

Just curious why you are surprised Tony. I thought she the best looking out of the small group he had picked from. It is nice to see a brunette with natural breasts. Plus she photographs very well.

Semi-Retired-Dave 12-22-2008 11:01 PM

Dean, just walk into their LA offices and fill out an application. Make sure you show the CyberAge as your portfolio.

PXN 12-23-2008 01:37 AM

Dean, I check out your sig and photos from Capturegirls.com looks really good. Playboy would be very lucky to have you as a photographer.

Here's a bump for Dean and FREE SPEECH!

tranza 12-23-2008 07:16 AM

I have to agree that one was not a big thing!

DeanCapture 12-23-2008 11:34 AM

Quote:

From Playboy.com:

This is a confirmation that your membership to Playboy Cyber Club:Renews Monthly at $24.95 has been cancelled.

However, you will continue to have access to your subscription until 12/23/08.
:thumbsup

KillerK 12-23-2008 01:48 PM

Dean won't get banned by Eric for speaking his mind, if he made shit up then maybe.

Nothing Dean has said is untrue nor should it be taken as anything but constructive criticism. Hell I think he really is offended the quality is so poor since he appreciates the style Playboy is soooo much.

pamon 12-23-2008 03:14 PM

dean shoots some of the top 1% of photography that i've seen here and elsewhere. he knows his shit. Playboy hasn't had it in years and a $2 stock price today verifies that. That old model couldn't make their cover 10 years ago and Hef doesn't run the company anymore. Kudos to Dean for speaking his mind on the photos.

Penthouse will resurface faster than PB in this world. What grabs you on their website anyway? $25/mo for softcore fluff pieces and glamour shots? Tons on online places for that.

tony286 12-23-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 15235096)
Just curious why you are surprised Tony. I thought she the best looking out of the small group he had picked from. It is nice to see a brunette with natural breasts. Plus she photographs very well.

I think playmate I think fresh, girl next door with a sexy playful look. I dont see that with her.

Pornwolf 12-23-2008 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15232278)
Wrong, you are thinking in terms of how the old administration dealt with things.

We are under a new regime! Free speech is back

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Pornwolf 12-23-2008 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15233940)
Eric, why do they call you Tender Thighs? :winkwink:

Congrats on 7000 posts! And, congrats on your free-speech comment earlier. And, congrats on your new position with Playboy. And, congrats on having Jelena as a girlfriend (hot-hot-hot). Sounds like this may be your best year ever :thumbsup

Ditto, ditto and dit-mother'effin-to!

Far-L 12-23-2008 04:47 PM

Ummm... just for the record and hopefully add some perspective in this... Playboy's most popular cable program for over 10 years is "Naughty Amateur Home Videos". It is also one of their stickiest and best converting web properties to my understanding.:2 cents:

And I can personally guarantee that it is some of the lowest production quality in the whole Playboy library. :winkwink::thumbsup

BVF 12-23-2008 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15234575)
Just out of curiosity, does your friend have any experience with photography? What is his background? What makes him qualified to be a photo editor? Just curious.....

If you have an eye for angles, it doesn't matter....You're qualified....

I don't have expertise with lighting and different lenses but I DO know a good angle and good photography when I see it....

In fact, I wouldn't want a person who is too technical with the photography doing the editing...I want a person who looks at it like a horny man with his dick out would...

DeanCapture 12-23-2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF (Post 15238576)
I wouldn't want a person who is too technical with the photography doing the editing...I want a person who looks at it like a horny man with his dick out would...

Shooting and editing high-end Glamour/Nude Photography and skank/crack whore photography is two completely different skillsets. They both have their audience but I don't see any crossover what-so-ever.

Far-L 12-23-2008 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15238619)
Shooting and editing high-end Glamour/Nude Photography and skank/crack whore photography is two completely different skillsets. They both have their audience but I don't see any crossover what-so-ever.

Isn't that what Penthouse accomplished on its best days in the heydey of that publication as a primarily print mag?

JayAllan 12-24-2008 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 15239866)
Isn't that what Penthouse accomplished on its best days in the heydey of that publication as a primarily print mag?

Your post is not clear (to me) but .. Penthouse is the heyday had big production shoots by the likes of J Stephen Hicks, Hank Londoner, and Earl Miller. They were lots of lights, lots of makeup, great sets or locations, and very high production quality. Almost every issue had a black and white set shot in Europe. There sales went DOWN and they lost a lot of advertisers when they went harder and sluttier. That was the beginning of their downfall. I know this firsthand.

Oracle Porn 12-24-2008 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF (Post 15238576)
I don't have expertise with lighting and different lenses

you think people dont see that?
your content is unique and no where else to be found, thats the only thing that sets you apart from the rest....no offense but i dont think you even know what photoshop is and the only thing you do in raw is fuck those skanks :)
but you've found your niche and its working great for you! congrats

DollarKing 12-24-2008 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232251)
Dear Playboy.com,

...today I am cancelling my subscription to your website. I've used it primarily over the years as study material.

Of course u did !
Gfy where the industry bitches.

DeanCapture 12-24-2008 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DollarKing (Post 15240012)
Of course u did !
Gfy where the industry bitches.

What would this place be without the idiots? :1orglaugh

Oracle Porn 12-24-2008 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15240040)
What would this place be without the idiots? :1orglaugh

gfy with no idiots

=

http://ohiogenealogy.files.wordpress...empty-room.jpg

sexandcash 12-24-2008 02:42 AM

wow....with crap like the pic you posted in this thread..I'm not surprised playboy is going thru tough times...that girl looks AWFUL and the pic looks like some crap a 5 yr old would shoot...bllecchh

boudoir 01-02-2009 10:14 PM

I've been saddened to see Playboy bring in more tats and piercings. However it's probably hard to not have any these days.

The biggest problem I see with that image is the quality of the lighting. I remember being awed by the sheer number of lights in use for a centerfold. Is there even a key light in use in that shot?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc