GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Dear Playboy.com ::: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=877147)

gooddomains 12-22-2008 01:33 PM

i'd hit them any time

stickyfingerz 12-22-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 15232557)
You sure about that?

Sigh mostly sure. :Oh crap:1orglaugh:helpme

Deej 12-22-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15232615)
I don't want to hijack Dean's thread, but you guys will be seeing a revised way of doing things around here effective Jan 1. There will be a full announcement and listing of how these items will be handled.

Carry on

cool - awaiting announcements


annnnd - congrats on 7k posts :pimp

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 01:50 PM

And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...with little to no regard for color correcting or enhancing the footage. My CaptureGirls HD footage looks 20 times better then most of the footage on Playboy.com and I'm a one-man operation. I shoot it, edit it, color correct it and enhance it all myself. Does it take money? No! It simply takes having pride in your work...that's all! If I can do this - surely Playboy can do this!

By the way, I'm available for consultations if Playboy needs my services :winkwink: My clients don't do business with me because I'm cheap.....they do business with me because I have an eye for quality and I take pride in my work. This is something that seems to be sorely lacking with my friends at Playboy.com :Oh crap

Eric, is there anyone you can forward this thread to that gives a damn about the quality of the content on Playboy.com?

johnuno11 12-22-2008 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...with little to no regard for color correcting or enhancing the footage. My CaptureGirls HD footage looks 20 times better then most of the footage on Playboy.com and I'm a one-man operation. I shoot it, edit it, color correct it and enhance it all myself. Does it take money? No! It simply takes having pride in your work...that's all! If I can do this - surely Playboy can do this!

By the way, I'm available for consultations if Playboy needs my services :winkwink: My clients don't do business with me because I'm cheap.....they do business with me because I have an eye for quality and I take pride in my work. This is something that seems to be sorely lacking with my friends at Playboy.com :Oh crap

Eric, is there anyone you can forward this thread to that gives a damn about the quality of the content on Playboy.com?

Dude I looked at your site and you shoot really good content if that's your website.

To be honest with you comparing your pictures to playboys your photography work and time taken per picture, editing is far more superior then playboy. I think they should hire you to shoot content.

Dagwolf 12-22-2008 02:12 PM

Thank heaven
For naked girls
Without them what
Would naked boys doooooooooooo?...

notime 12-22-2008 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...with little to no regard for color correcting or enhancing the footage. My CaptureGirls HD footage looks 20 times better then most of the footage on Playboy.com and I'm a one-man operation. I shoot it, edit it, color correct it and enhance it all myself. Does it take money? No! It simply takes having pride in your work...that's all! If I can do this - surely Playboy can do this!

By the way, I'm available for consultations if Playboy needs my services :winkwink: My clients don't do business with me because I'm cheap.....they do business with me because I have an eye for quality and I take pride in my work. This is something that seems to be sorely lacking with my friends at Playboy.com :Oh crap

Eric, is there anyone you can forward this thread to that gives a damn about the quality of the content on Playboy.com?

Dean,
You do have the playboy standards potential and ambition IMHO but some sentences above in your last post I would have rephrased in other words.
:2 cents:

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notime (Post 15232906)
Dean,
You do have the playboy standards potential and ambition IMHO but some sentences above in your last post I would have rephrased in other words.
:2 cents:

I'm not an artist with words - I just say what I feel :thumbsup

DamageX 12-22-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15232278)
Wrong, you are thinking in terms of how the old administration dealt with things.

We are under a new regime! Free speech is back

I wonder... :)

Machete_ 12-22-2008 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnuno11 (Post 15232877)
Dude I looked at your site and you shoot really good content if that's your website.

To be honest with you comparing your pictures to playboys your photography work and time taken per picture, editing is far more superior then playboy. I think they should hire you to shoot content.


facepalm pic <---

JFK 12-22-2008 02:20 PM

Fitty..............Dear Playboy's :Graucho

John-ACWM 12-22-2008 02:49 PM

You know best. Enjoy the holidays!

Eric 12-22-2008 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...with little to no regard for color correcting or enhancing the footage. My CaptureGirls HD footage looks 20 times better then most of the footage on Playboy.com and I'm a one-man operation. I shoot it, edit it, color correct it and enhance it all myself. Does it take money? No! It simply takes having pride in your work...that's all! If I can do this - surely Playboy can do this!

By the way, I'm available for consultations if Playboy needs my services :winkwink: My clients don't do business with me because I'm cheap.....they do business with me because I have an eye for quality and I take pride in my work. This is something that seems to be sorely lacking with my friends at Playboy.com :Oh crap

Eric, is there anyone you can forward this thread to that gives a damn about the quality of the content on Playboy.com?

Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

JFK 12-22-2008 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15233906)
Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

Congrats on the 7K:thumbsup

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15233906)
Dean,

As stated above in my previous post. I have started this ball rolling. I will do what I can, unfortunately I do not run the playboy.com properties. But They do seem to listen to me at least a little bit. So I will do what I can.

YES! I used my 7000 post here

Eric

Eric, why do they call you Tender Thighs? :winkwink:

Congrats on 7000 posts! And, congrats on your free-speech comment earlier. And, congrats on your new position with Playboy. And, congrats on having Jelena as a girlfriend (hot-hot-hot). Sounds like this may be your best year ever :thumbsup

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 12-22-2008 07:32 PM

You tell em Dean... For the, how many thread so far, time.. You are right and they should give you a job...

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 15234493)
You tell em Dean... For the, how many thread so far, time.. You are right and they should give you a job...

Giving me a job won't solve their issues....I'm perfectly happy doing what I'm doing. I don't think I'd do very well in the corporate world. I'd end up telling someone to go fuck themselves and I'd be right back where I am now. Shooting some of the hottest girls in the industry for some of the largest and most successful websites in the world. I got a nice life, don't need Playboy for anything :thumbsup

Si 12-22-2008 07:43 PM

This thread delivers
http://420.thrashbarg.net/this_threa...ick_amazon.jpg

Nurgle 12-22-2008 07:44 PM

Dean your right.. without Arny and Steve, the quality of Playboy is poor to say the least.. I cant believe some of the poor pics for the Playmates they are doing in the "extras" each month, i sometimes think I could get my throw away camera and produce better pics, and i have no fucking idea how to take a photo. When u have girls that are soooo fucking hot, one needs to give them the quality output they deserver

good thread!

Marcus Aurelius 12-22-2008 07:47 PM

Glad to see some changes coming down the pipe. And I agree with dean, she is not hideous but that shot is not flattering.

tony286 12-22-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mobilefun1987 (Post 15234532)

my ups person has never looked like that.:(

dexternax 12-22-2008 07:55 PM

My best friend just got a job at Playboy... Today was his first day actually... He's gonna be the one sorting through the good and bad pics... I just showed him this thread :)

he said 'ok'... ill see what i can do

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dexternax (Post 15234571)
My best friend just got a job at Playboy... Today was his first day actually... He's gonna be the one sorting through the good and bad pics... I just showed him this thread :)

he said 'ok'... ill see what i can do

Just out of curiosity, does your friend have any experience with photography? What is his background? What makes him qualified to be a photo editor? Just curious.....

Manowar 12-22-2008 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mobilefun1987 (Post 15234532)

i could 'deliver' into that girl

MaDalton 12-22-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15234575)
Just out of curiosity, does your friend have any experience with photography? What is his background? What makes him qualified to be a photo editor? Just curious.....

i'm afraid i know the answer already

dexternax 12-22-2008 08:10 PM

Yeah he's very good. He has a good eye. Educated in photography. He worked for one of the biggest commercial studios here in Chicago. He knows what he's doing... I've been friends with him for a long time now... he has a good eye for beautiful girls. He's gonna be running around doing casting stuff too.

dexternax 12-22-2008 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 15234595)
i'm afraid i know the answer already

Haha have no fear :)

seeric 12-22-2008 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 15232278)
Wrong, you are thinking in terms of how the old administration dealt with things.

We are under a new regime! Free speech is back

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thum bsup

in the end, they're just words. glad to see that got through to people.

tender bones for the win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DeanCapture 12-22-2008 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dexternax (Post 15234613)
Yeah he's very good. He has a good eye. Educated in photography. He worked for one of the biggest commercial studios here in Chicago. He knows what he's doing... I've been friends with him for a long time now... he has a good eye for beautiful girls. He's gonna be running around doing casting stuff too.

Well good luck to your friend. Hopefully he'll make a difference.

JayAllan 12-22-2008 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232772)
And while I'm at it - let me say a few words about the quality of the video on Playboy.com. As someone who has been investing heavily in HD camera gear, HD post-production and HD education in general, I can't believe some of the stuff I'm seeing on Playboy.com. The colors are flat and the contrast is flat. It's like they captured the footage to the computer and threw it right up on the site...

Dean,

They don't have anyone over there that cares about quality. In fact, there is almost no-one in this entire industry that cares about quality. Playboy's Video has been pathetic for many years. Back in the day they actually used mainstream directors and cinematographers to capture quality. But that ended in the early 90s. They didn't want to pay for it. Hugh appreciates quality and has always been a big supporter of artists. They have been showcased through the years in the magazine and even lived at the mansion. Painters, writers, photographers, filmmakers. But he does not care anymore and is not making those decisions. :( Its also too big a corporation now. There are many fearful people working there who are afraid for their jobs and are scared to change. I see it all the time.

Don't worry. Quality work will always rise to the top and there will always be a place for it. High end photography, and more so video, in these industry will be coming in a big way after this recession. With the tech that is coming out now we are in a position to do some stuff in adult that has never been seen before. This will sell.

It is a lot harder to sell Ferraris than it is to sell Honda Civics, and you can sell a lot more Hondas, but I would rather sell a few Ferraris personally. And hey, there is less competition at the top :2 cents:

DWB 12-22-2008 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 15232930)
I'm not an artist with words - I just say what I feel :thumbsup

As the great Steve Martin once said, "Some people have a way with words and some people... just don't... have a way... with... words."

DWB 12-22-2008 08:55 PM

Oh... and let me add...

Until Playboy starts putting trannies under their wing, they can expect continued quarterly losses.

seeric 12-22-2008 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 15234744)
Oh... and let me add...

Until Playboy starts putting trannies under their wing, they can expect continued quarterly losses.

considering that a massive percentage of my tranny customers are straight males, i would tend to agree with you on that.

Chit Chat 12-22-2008 09:18 PM

http://www.funnyforumpics.com/forums...rs/1/atlas.jpg

Mutt 12-22-2008 09:30 PM

Dean you're correct but it won't happen - tough economic times for one and Playboy in particular is struggling - they have spread themselves too thin - when all they had to take care of was the magazine, quality was easy to achieve. Now they have a website that demands many times the amount of content that the magazine takes - plus Special Editions magazines, plus a bunch of other paysites. Quality of model and content goes down. Ask any webmaster who owns a paysites with large numbers of models and photographers, Shap/Kim/Louis/BillNubiles/Met-Art etc - how hard it is to maintain quality control.

Hef's pick for the 55th anniversary Playmate is bizarre.

PMGames 12-22-2008 09:36 PM

wow....what have I been missing out on all this time. lol. :)

tony286 12-22-2008 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15234849)
Dean you're correct but it won't happen - tough economic times for one and Playboy in particular is struggling - they have spread themselves too thin - when all they had to take care of was the magazine, quality was easy to achieve. Now they have a website that demands many times the amount of content that the magazine takes - plus Special Editions magazines, plus a bunch of other paysites. Quality of model and content goes down. Ask any webmaster who owns a paysites with large numbers of models and photographers, Shap/Kim/Louis/BillNubiles/Met-Art etc - how hard it is to maintain quality control.

Hef's pick for the 55th anniversary Playmate is bizarre.

I was surprised by his pick also.

Iron Fist 12-22-2008 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 15232503)
I have a penis, girls have a vagina.. :thumbsup

After 20,000 posts... you might be on to something there. Keep up the good work. :thumbsup

NaughtyRob 12-22-2008 10:41 PM

Dean why are you trying so hard to get banned? Just wondering.

JaneB 12-22-2008 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15234881)
I was surprised by his pick also.

Just curious why you are surprised Tony. I thought she the best looking out of the small group he had picked from. It is nice to see a brunette with natural breasts. Plus she photographs very well.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc