GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Twistys abusing ICANN policies and pushing people around? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=891090)

Matyko 03-04-2009 08:48 AM

http://www.reputationdefender.com/

arock10 03-04-2009 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 15580283)
Shap , while looking thru some trademark stuff i noticed a funny coincidence.

You registered sextube 8 days after a different company called sextube ( the company blue titan media , you spoke about fighting earlier "officialsextube" ) applied for a trademark on "pornotube". Coincidence ?

p.s. not trying to stir shit but you mentioned you regged sextube to protect the name just like twistys, is there more to the story ?


Ironic. So you trademarked "sextube" so someone that regged pornotube.com and then tmed "pornotube" couldn't take your domain even though they weren't related at all and are both generic terms? Youtube should've just sued you both right away and ended this nonsense right there. But now you turn around and do exactly what you were trying to prevent to other people? Nice, once again.

DarkJedi 03-04-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexes (Post 15580808)
This is one epic fail.

Shap used to be considered one of the good guys.

Guess he does not need the little people anymore.

http://www.bikinivoyeur.com/tube-looter.jpg

Machete_ 03-04-2009 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15581594)

Dork Jedi, the humor is strong with you :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

BadBrad 03-04-2009 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fatbat (Post 15577062)
Actually, I wouldn't bother with a cease and desist. All I would have to do is file a UDRP or WIPO case, pay my $1500 for one panelist for up to 5 domains, and you would lose all those domains because the trademark predates your registration and you clearly registered them in bad faith.

Actually you would not get them down like you think.
Examples:

http://www.paypalsucks.com
http://www.ebaysucks.com/
http://www.aolsucks.org/
http://yahooosucks.com/

So your telling me his trademark and lawyers are better than those listed above? There's plenty more just like that.

DarkJedi 03-04-2009 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk (Post 15582015)
Dork Jedi, the humor is strong with you :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

wasn't me, the credit goes to BV :thumbsup

FelixFlow 03-04-2009 12:59 PM

correct me if i'm wrong but....


if you trademark something, you have to USE THAT trademark to enforce it

so, even if you have the earliest date of a trademark, it really comes down to who USED the mark first

so if someone tm'd a name years ago, but just decided to start developing it, and someone with a similiar name but already has it in use - then the earliest use is the one that wins

right?

seeandsee 03-04-2009 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15581594)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

lazycash 03-04-2009 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 15580316)
You responded with this when I suggested a compromise. Can you elaborate as to what exactly you want from him if you aren't interested in destroying his livelihood?

Shap has selective answering.

BadBrad 03-04-2009 02:38 PM

So I take it these guys best be worried too?

http://www.sextubesearch.com/

Niktamer 03-04-2009 02:50 PM

I just lost faith in one of my role model.

minddust 03-04-2009 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niktamer (Post 15582923)
I just lost faith in one of my role model.

we're crying

sergetraffic[dot]com 03-04-2009 03:55 PM

OMFG ...so FashionTV (FTV.com) can own FTVGirls.com?! horseshit...:321GFY

Shap 03-04-2009 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15581594)

LOVE IT! Thanks man!

Fatbat 03-04-2009 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadBrad (Post 15582029)
Actually you would not get them down like you think.
Examples:

http://www.paypalsucks.com
http://www.ebaysucks.com/
http://www.aolsucks.org/
http://yahooosucks.com/

So your telling me his trademark and lawyers are better than those listed above? There's plenty more just like that.

Let's see...

Paypal sucks... legitimate beef site with no monetization protected by the first amendment.

ebay sucks... the same

AOL sucks... owned by AOL

Yahoo sucks, another beef site, with monetization. Only a matter of time before they lose the domain.

Actually I was going to write about "sucks" sites but I didn't want to waste my breath and, quite frankly, those are piss poor examples. It's obvious these are protected under the 1st as long as you are making an editorial statement and don't MONETIZE them. Clearly AOL schooled someone at some point though. Yahoo is on it's way. The other two are walking that fine line.

Nice try dude, but pretty weak.

Va2k 03-04-2009 05:14 PM

Damn shap glad you are so thrilled with all this publicity you're getting from this! Don't worry ya little head dude, you will be be back in the bro's club next month... I am very very surprised that fucking with people like you have that know one has done anything like attack you or your servers etc..( Lets hope that don't happen )

I don't agree with your new tactics that you have been doing the last few months, Hell been in shock mode since you first started your new ways! Good luck at finding your way back! I'm not trying to bash you just given you my feed back!

mmcfadden 03-04-2009 05:18 PM

are view counts each user or cummulative regardless of ip or user? just wondering

NetHorse 03-04-2009 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fatbat (Post 15583748)
Let's see...

Paypal sucks... legitimate beef site with no monetization protected by the first amendment.

ebay sucks... the same

AOL sucks... owned by AOL

Yahoo sucks, another beef site, with monetization. Only a matter of time before they lose the domain.

Actually I was going to write about "sucks" sites but I didn't want to waste my breath and, quite frankly, those are piss poor examples. It's obvious these are protected under the 1st as long as you are making an editorial statement and don't MONETIZE them. Clearly AOL schooled someone at some point though. Yahoo is on it's way. The other two are walking that fine line.

Nice try dude, but pretty weak.

There are plenty more...

Ford has trademarks on "SVT" which is a performance division of Ford.

SVTPerformance.com - Lots of traffic, earns decent income.

Ford wanted to seize the domain and SVTperformance to pay a hefty fine.
Judge ruled that SVTperformance put a disclaimer saying they're in no way affiliated with Ford, and not to use any trademarked logos, or photos which may confuse the public into thinking it's a subsidiary of Ford. Ford Lost.

There are plenty of small cases with Ebay as well where people used the term, "bay" and kept their domains despite legal action.

Let it be known I'm not against what Shap has done here, he has a trademark and if his lawyers feel he needs to take legal action to protect his interests then so be it. :upsidedow

However, I don't feel he has a real legal case against hardsextube.com. He might get a bunch of other related domains simply because people will surrender them to avoid legal action, but that would be the extent of it unless someone is deliberately violating his trademark and intellectual property rights.

Here is what I think..

Hardsextube is a one word domain, so technically it doesn't have the trademarked term, "sextube" in it by itself. Regardless of that, since there are thousands of adult tube sites, the judge will see the term sex used in an adult tube site as generic.

Hardsextube doesn't use any logos, text, banners, design, etc from sextube in an attempt to clone Sextube.com or confuse people into thinking it's sextube which may tarnish it's reputation or control of quality.

Hardsextube doesn't promote twistys sponsored content like sextube, it's an online adult tube site like many others out there with general content. While still an adult site, it's source of income isn't in direct competition with sextube.com

Hardsextube is a long established site with trademarks in it's own country, it also currently has a lot more traffic coming in and always has had more traffic than sextube.com. In other words, it didn't "steal" away traffic from sextube.com in order to get established.

:)

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 03-05-2009 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sergetraffic[dot]com (Post 15583376)
OMFG ...so FashionTV (FTV.com) can own FTVGirls.com?! horseshit...:321GFY

:1orglaugh

Pipeline Q 03-05-2009 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fatbat (Post 15583748)
Yahoo sucks, another beef site, with monetization. Only a matter of time before they lose the domain.

There are tons of car forums with a trademarked name in the URL that sell ad space. Lots of video game sites also.

Volvo just recently lost their case against VolvoSpares.com and they are definitely monetizing it.

l0lf4c3 03-05-2009 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 15578879)
12 pages. I'm going to send Eric a bill for boosting ad views this week ;)

Such an asshole...

and what lold me the most is his sig:

"
If you are interested in doing business with us please contact: BizShap at Prickies dot com
Wanna know the secrets to our success? Read Them Here

"

:321GFY

gideongallery 03-05-2009 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog (Post 15579806)
Jaguar. Penthouse.

out of scope use


based on historical search results that have already been presented that is NOT what shap did.

What he did was the equivalent of what microsoft did with the trademark term windows. Take a generic term pre-established with in the SCOPE of his trademark, and file a trademark claim to it. (see parc windows/ x-windows etc)

as in the lindows.com vs microsoft case, microsoft was forced to buy their way out of that lawsuit or they would have lost the trademark.

cherrylula 03-05-2009 07:59 AM

wow 13 pages

is someone giving away $50 prizes in here???

here is my entry :1orglaugh

Niktamer 03-05-2009 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetHorse (Post 15584333)
There are plenty more...

Ford has trademarks on "SVT" which is a performance division of Ford.

SVTPerformance.com - Lots of traffic, earns decent income.

Ford wanted to seize the domain and SVTperformance to pay a hefty fine.
Judge ruled that SVTperformance put a disclaimer saying they're in no way affiliated with Ford, and not to use any trademarked logos, or photos which may confuse the public into thinking it's a subsidiary of Ford. Ford Lost.

There are plenty of small cases with Ebay as well where people used the term, "bay" and kept their domains despite legal action.

Let it be known I'm not against what Shap has done here, he has a trademark and if his lawyers feel he needs to take legal action to protect his interests then so be it. :upsidedow

However, I don't feel he has a real legal case against hardsextube.com. He might get a bunch of other related domains simply because people will surrender them to avoid legal action, but that would be the extent of it unless someone is deliberately violating his trademark and intellectual property rights.

Here is what I think..

Hardsextube is a one word domain, so technically it doesn't have the trademarked term, "sextube" in it by itself. Regardless of that, since there are thousands of adult tube sites, the judge will see the term sex used in an adult tube site as generic.

Hardsextube doesn't use any logos, text, banners, design, etc from sextube in an attempt to clone Sextube.com or confuse people into thinking it's sextube which may tarnish it's reputation or control of quality.

Hardsextube doesn't promote twistys sponsored content like sextube, it's an online adult tube site like many others out there with general content. While still an adult site, it's source of income isn't in direct competition with sextube.com

Hardsextube is a long established site with trademarks in it's own country, it also currently has a lot more traffic coming in and always has had more traffic than sextube.com. In other words, it didn't "steal" away traffic from sextube.com in order to get established.

:)


Thats a good resume, i dont think hardsextube profit in any case of the trademark.

I highly doubt any judge would order a domain transfer.

Juicy D. Links 03-05-2009 12:05 PM

who wants a cockmeat sandwhich?

Cyandin 03-05-2009 12:15 PM

Wow, this threads length is pwning even the gay contest threads!

Brujah 03-05-2009 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyandin (Post 15587706)
Wow, this threads length is pwning even the gay contest threads!

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 15586247)
wow 13 pages

is someone giving away $50 prizes in here???

here is my entry :1orglaugh

The last poster in this thread wins.

Cyandin 03-05-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 15587719)
The last poster in this thread wins.

Yay, I win!

DarkJedi 03-05-2009 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyandin (Post 15587728)
Yay, I win!

O'RLY?

:1orglaugh

BVF 03-05-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 15587614)
who wants a cockmeat sandwhich?


Ummmmm.....YOU?

cess 03-05-2009 06:06 PM

This thread finally made it to the second page.

Jel 03-05-2009 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cess (Post 15589571)
This thread finally made it to the second page.

Yeah, about time too.

director 03-06-2009 12:21 AM

Well after reading this soap opera....no offence here! But apparently if I get this right hardsextube is and was a register trade mark before sex tube.... Its not infringe on any copy right..or masking itself as any one else with logos and banners....is a separate entity.

Well anyway if this is the case according to twistys ( no offence shap ) you can go after, any tube site a matter of fact with what I am reading here as long as the word ..sextube is in it... lesbiansextube.com, fagsextube.com, pantiesextube.com, heelsandhoesextube.com

I do not think anything here is infringing on anything.... offer to buy his shit and move one!

By the way I am in Canada as well...and if this is put forth in description right....I have to do some investigation on my own....because according to


This is what the federal government has to say
about protecting your corporate name.

1. ?The granting of names under the Canada Business Corporations Act does not protect you from earlier or subsequent trade-marks of other parties.?

2. ?You may wish to conduct your own NUANS searches on a periodic basis after your name has been approved. This would be done in order to ensure, to your own satisfaction, that no confusing corporate or business name has subsequently been approved in the jurisdiction(s) in which you are carrying on business, and to give you up to date information about trade-marks that have been applied for or registered subsequent to the granting of your corporate name.?

3. ?Using a corporate name which is similar to a registered trade-mark may result in liability for infringement of the registered trade-mark even if the trade-mark was registered after the corporate name was granted. This is so because, under trade-marks law, the holder of a corporate name bears the responsibility of ensuring that no new trade-marks are registered which are confusing with that name.?

4. ?Registration of a trade-mark is the best way to obtain the exclusive right to use the mark in all of Canada in association with the products and services for which the registration is obtained. While the Trade-Marks Office can provide basic guidance, it is recommended that a specialist be consulted.?

So in fact the owns would be on you shap to ensure you are not infringing on anyone else trade mark in canada and similar in USA.... since he was/ is register first.... How can he be the infringer.....Also he is in Europe and Not North America...thus separate!

Yep I would like to see how this pan out....anyway!

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 03-06-2009 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by director (Post 15590498)
Well after reading this soap opera....no offence here! But apparently if I get this right hardsextube is and was a register trade mark before sex tube.... Its not infringe on any copy right..or masking itself as any one else with logos and banners....is a separate entity.

Well anyway if this is the case according to twistys ( no offence shap ) you can go after, any tube site a matter of fact with what I am reading here as long as the word ..sextube is in it... lesbiansextube.com, fagsextube.com, pantiesextube.com, heelsandhoesextube.com

I do not think anything here is infringing on anything.... offer to buy his shit and move one!

By the way I am in Canada as well...and if this is put forth in description right....I have to do some investigation on my own....because according to


This is what the federal government has to say
about protecting your corporate name.

1. ?The granting of names under the Canada Business Corporations Act does not protect you from earlier or subsequent trade-marks of other parties.?

2. ?You may wish to conduct your own NUANS searches on a periodic basis after your name has been approved. This would be done in order to ensure, to your own satisfaction, that no confusing corporate or business name has subsequently been approved in the jurisdiction(s) in which you are carrying on business, and to give you up to date information about trade-marks that have been applied for or registered subsequent to the granting of your corporate name.?

3. ?Using a corporate name which is similar to a registered trade-mark may result in liability for infringement of the registered trade-mark even if the trade-mark was registered after the corporate name was granted. This is so because, under trade-marks law, the holder of a corporate name bears the responsibility of ensuring that no new trade-marks are registered which are confusing with that name.?

4. ?Registration of a trade-mark is the best way to obtain the exclusive right to use the mark in all of Canada in association with the products and services for which the registration is obtained. While the Trade-Marks Office can provide basic guidance, it is recommended that a specialist be consulted.?

So in fact the owns would be on you shap to ensure you are not infringing on anyone else trade mark in canada and similar in USA.... since he was/ is register first.... How can he be the infringer.....Also he is in Europe and Not North America...thus separate!

Yep I would like to see how this pan out....anyway!

exactly :thumbsup

Cyber Fucker 03-06-2009 09:25 AM

Huh, that is a nice reading over here... looks like mr. Shap is getting owned by his own greed and unfair doing btw. I am not supporting any side. It's a shame too that some questionable content might be found on hardsextube.com but that what Twistys is doing is disgusting and there is no excuse for doing that.

Shap 03-06-2009 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by director (Post 15590498)
Well after reading this soap opera....no offence here! But apparently if I get this right hardsextube is and was a register trade mark before sex tube.... Its not infringe on any copy right..or masking itself as any one else with logos and banners....is a separate entity.

Well anyway if this is the case according to twistys ( no offence shap ) you can go after, any tube site a matter of fact with what I am reading here as long as the word ..sextube is in it... lesbiansextube.com, fagsextube.com, pantiesextube.com, heelsandhoesextube.com

I do not think anything here is infringing on anything.... offer to buy his shit and move one!

By the way I am in Canada as well...and if this is put forth in description right....I have to do some investigation on my own....because according to


This is what the federal government has to say
about protecting your corporate name.

1. ?The granting of names under the Canada Business Corporations Act does not protect you from earlier or subsequent trade-marks of other parties.?

2. ?You may wish to conduct your own NUANS searches on a periodic basis after your name has been approved. This would be done in order to ensure, to your own satisfaction, that no confusing corporate or business name has subsequently been approved in the jurisdiction(s) in which you are carrying on business, and to give you up to date information about trade-marks that have been applied for or registered subsequent to the granting of your corporate name.?

3. ?Using a corporate name which is similar to a registered trade-mark may result in liability for infringement of the registered trade-mark even if the trade-mark was registered after the corporate name was granted. This is so because, under trade-marks law, the holder of a corporate name bears the responsibility of ensuring that no new trade-marks are registered which are confusing with that name.?

4. ?Registration of a trade-mark is the best way to obtain the exclusive right to use the mark in all of Canada in association with the products and services for which the registration is obtained. While the Trade-Marks Office can provide basic guidance, it is recommended that a specialist be consulted.?

So in fact the owns would be on you shap to ensure you are not infringing on anyone else trade mark in canada and similar in USA.... since he was/ is register first.... How can he be the infringer.....Also he is in Europe and Not North America...thus separate!

Yep I would like to see how this pan out....anyway!

You have the facts all messed up. I can't expect anything less from gfy. If one person says it it must be true.

borked 03-06-2009 10:32 AM

Quote:

Can the same trademark be registered in more than one country?
Trade marks once registered apply throughout the territory of the country where it is registered, but only for the goods and services specified. It is possible to extend the trademark registration from your home country to other countries where you intend to use the trademark. The Republic of Ireland is a party to the Madrid Protocol for the international registration of trademarks. The Madrid Protocol makes it possible to designate additional countires over time, subject to no other prior or similar trademark registrations in those countries involved.


So, the fact that this guy registered his TM in Hungary(?) before the US TM notwithstanding, all he needs to do is register sextube as a TM in his country of residence.

Seems like petty shit to me - I'm off to register gofuckyourself as I plan to develop its use later. In the meantime, gonna get the domain handed over to me.
pffft

Nobody heard of prior use?

Shap 03-06-2009 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borked (Post 15592183)
Trade marks once registered apply throughout the territory of the country where it is registered, but only for the goods and services specified. It is possible to extend the trademark registration from your home country to other countries where you intend to use the trademark. The Republic of Ireland is a party to the Madrid Protocol for the international registration of trademarks. The Madrid Protocol makes it possible to designate additional countires over time, subject to no other prior or similar trademark registrations in those countries involved.


So, the fact that this guy registered his TM in Hungary(?) before the US TM notwithstanding, all he needs to do is register sextube as a TM in his country of residence.

Seems like petty shit to me - I'm off to register gofuckyourself as I plan to develop its use later. In the meantime, gonna get the domain handed over to me.
pffft

Nobody heard of prior use?

Again facts are wrong. HE DID NOT REGISTER IT BEFORE WE DID

Cyandin 03-06-2009 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 15588550)
O'RLY?

:1orglaugh

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/e...g?t=1236361471

borked 03-06-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 15592212)
Again facts are wrong. HE DID NOT REGISTER IT BEFORE WE DID

OK, I was just going off the OP - Jesus as if I'm going to read 12 pages of bashing to find out.

Is you trademark extended to Hungary? Highly doubt it. :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc