GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   [PornReviews.com launched] Critique the critics ? give us your review! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=905021)

Elixir 05-31-2009 12:56 AM

Very nice review, like it

voa 05-31-2009 04:07 AM

Not bad at all guys

HunkyLuke 05-31-2009 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeppe (Post 15899470)
...We don't list gay sites at the moment, but we are considering whether we should start doing so.

Please do, and if you need a reviewer I can get you in touch with a couple of professional gay site reviewers too (email me on luke -a- hunkmoney.com). If you don't you will be missing out on a HUGE market that is still coverting extremely well even in this recession. You know how it is with the gay market: usually no kids, well paid, always horny and joining online sites is something that we actually chat about with each other...so more $$ for you!

cheers,
Luke

Cherry7 06-01-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 15910515)

Easy to shoot a photo set for Penthouse on a budget of $3,000+ try shooting it on video for a budget most Internet sites want to work in and you will hit a wall. And there is your problem for most High Production porn. The budgets this part of the business works on does not allow the level of quality you're asking for. It takes more then a professionalcamera to produce a professional film.

We don't have a problem in producing high quality material.

Of course costs are a factor but the race to the bottom of quantity over quality I believe is reaching a turning point.

If the person making the porn has nothing to add in ideas, lighting production etc then he will fail..

After all every Joe and his grilfriend can by the camera and produce results equal to the average porn site

ANd if this is free http://www.tube8.com/teen/teens-sex/123523/

Who is going to pay for more of the same?

Cheap video cameras led the chase to the bottom of quality, now there is a chance of making something better, something people will be prepared to pay for. That the very good quality digital cameras can capture very high quality film like images. This means that small studios can produce imaginative erotic material which could be watched on people HDTVs. In a few years the internet will be capable of supply broadcast quality TV and major players are moving in for this development.

A good review site could help in this. Sadly the way they judge site seems to bear no relationship to anything.

Cherry7 06-01-2009 08:36 AM

[QUOTE=nation-x;15908714]Personally, I don't see the point of anything you are saying... QUOTE]


Best in cases like this to stay quiet, write something when you do understand.

Jeppe 06-02-2009 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 15913426)
We don't have a problem in producing high quality material.

Of course costs are a factor but the race to the bottom of quantity over quality I believe is reaching a turning point.

If the person making the porn has nothing to add in ideas, lighting production etc then he will fail..

After all every Joe and his grilfriend can by the camera and produce results equal to the average porn site

ANd if this is free http://www.tube8.com/teen/teens-sex/123523/

Who is going to pay for more of the same?

Cheap video cameras led the chase to the bottom of quality, now there is a chance of making something better, something people will be prepared to pay for. That the very good quality digital cameras can capture very high quality film like images. This means that small studios can produce imaginative erotic material which could be watched on people HDTVs. In a few years the internet will be capable of supply broadcast quality TV and major players are moving in for this development.

A good review site could help in this. Sadly the way they judge site seems to bear no relationship to anything.

A quick question for you, Cherry: Does the kind of porn you strive to produce, already exist elsewhere? I believe Vivid does this kind of erotic porn stories you talk about, but on a big budget - like the celebrity one with the former Miss USA Kelli McCarty or some of their other productions.

Personally I think porn like that is way too boring and would rather watch gonzo style porn like Buttman or similar.

Jeppe 06-02-2009 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HunkyLuke (Post 15911211)
Please do, and if you need a reviewer I can get you in touch with a couple of professional gay site reviewers too (email me on luke -a- hunkmoney.com). If you don't you will be missing out on a HUGE market that is still coverting extremely well even in this recession. You know how it is with the gay market: usually no kids, well paid, always horny and joining online sites is something that we actually chat about with each other...so more $$ for you!

cheers,
Luke

Thanks Luke, we'll take it up to reconsideration and I'll keep you in mind.

Cherry7 06-02-2009 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeppe (Post 15916340)
A quick question for you, Cherry: Does the kind of porn you strive to produce, already exist elsewhere? I believe Vivid does this kind of erotic porn stories you talk about, but on a big budget - like the celebrity one with the former Miss USA Kelli McCarty or some of their other productions.

Personally I think porn like that is way too boring and would rather watch gonzo style porn like Buttman or similar.

Strange question as you have reviewed all the sites, so you are better placed than me.

Nice that you give us a score of 8 and Vivid 6.5 . But maybe that reflects your love of Gonzo.

Maybe you should consider dividing your reviews up into Gonzo and non Gonzo, Porn and Erotic. You could use better criteria for each type of site.

After all "In The Crack" and "Met Art" are appealing to two different audiences.

This would also help with your conversions as more of your punters found what they wanted....

and maybe we would get more than a click a day !!!!!!!!

Jeppe 06-02-2009 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 15916455)
Strange question as you have reviewed all the sites, so you are better placed than me.

Nice that you give us a score of 8 and Vivid 6.5 . But maybe that reflects your love of Gonzo.

Maybe you should consider dividing your reviews up into Gonzo and non Gonzo, Porn and Erotic. You could use better criteria for each type of site.

After all "In The Crack" and "Met Art" are appealing to two different audiences.

This would also help with your conversions as more of your punters found what they wanted....

and maybe we would get more than a click a day !!!!!!!!

I know what I think, but I wanted to know if your ambition is to produce porn like Vivid etc. My point would have been that if people want the perfect girls in the perfectly shot, perfectly written stories, then Vivid would be the only major site or production company.

You have a point about being able to provide more specialized reviews for different niches. However we always review every site based on its own premise and mission statement.

Actually I just received a sales report from you earlier today: "Just to let you know that over the last 90 days you sent Cinema Erotique 481 clicks and made us 9 sales."

That's a ratio of 1:55, so it seems our readers get the idea in spite of our misguided review.

Itchy 06-02-2009 07:56 AM

What email can be used ?
[email protected] <[email protected]> bounced for me

nation-x 06-02-2009 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itchy (Post 15916877)
What email can be used ?
[email protected] <[email protected]> bounced for me

I am not sure why you would need to use email... they have a submission form.
http://www.pornreviews.com/webmasters.html

Cherry7 06-03-2009 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeppe (Post 15916552)
I know what I think, but I wanted to know if your ambition is to produce porn like Vivid etc. My point would have been that if people want the perfect girls in the perfectly shot, perfectly written stories, then Vivid would be the only major site or production company..

If you watch our film "The Signal" , that gives you an idea of what we are interested in. Based on a Guy De Maupassant short story it has a story and uncensored sex.

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/advert...nal_Poster.jpg


It is a shame that your prejudices favour one sort of work over another and don't allow the audience to find an alternative the mindnumbing boring gonzo....

Thomas007 06-03-2009 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Itchy (Post 15916877)
What email can be used ?
[email protected] <[email protected]> bounced for me

I'll look into that.

Thanks for the notice.

In the meantime you can reach us at, [email protected]

Jeppe 06-03-2009 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 15919588)
It is a shame that your prejudices favour one sort of work over another and don't allow the audience to find an alternative the mindnumbing boring gonzo....

Just because I personally don't like something, doesn't mean that it can't get a great review or a high score.

Cherry7 06-04-2009 09:10 AM

Yes but your scoring system does....

If we spend ten times the amount of a gonzo film on are next film we cannot update as often and cannot have Quantity of Gonxo sites,

That is the problem - your scoring system (and that of most review sites) is heavily wieghted in favour of quantity over quality.

bvds 06-04-2009 09:17 AM

Looks like a winner all round! :pimp

Thomas007 06-09-2009 02:38 AM

Since the launch we have released these features: External reviews, User reviews and User Comments.

raven1083 06-09-2009 04:48 AM

pretty cool! congrats

$5 submissions 06-09-2009 07:00 PM

Awesome site


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123