![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't forget the Fluoride in your tap water. |
go to Youtube.com
type in 'wtc flashes' watch the first several videos 100% controlled demolition |
Yeah its on You Tube so it must be true..... IDIOT
|
and the idiot conspiracy theorists persist.
|
I love this.
Us: Hey look more science from Engineers and people that know what they're talking about. Them: Idiot, moron... lol.. |
Just got 1 thing to say guys.....
STOP LIVING IN THE FUCKING PAST.... Those buildings are down, nothing you can do about it. And if you think by any chance anyone else then Bin Laden, who claimed his crew did it, will be prosecuted... Then you are dead wrong. Move the fuck on people... |
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
true story. |
Quote:
You: Hey here's some guys with pretty good qualifications who say it was a controlled demolition. They're scientists so we should accept what they have to say about it. The Majority of the World: Yeah okay, that's interesting. Unfortunately the VAST MAJORITY of people qualified in these disciplines don't agree with this analysis and further common sense kind of makes it the less likey of the two options. There's been at least two detailed reports explaining what _most likely_ happened and you can read them. Cumatively they were compiled by hundreds of experts. You: Everyone is on the goverment payroll!!! When will you sheep wake up?? |
Quote:
Again I am not saying it was an inside job, just saying I think there is a lot more to the story. |
Quote:
No really, please answer me...i really can't wait for you to tell what you are aiming at. Don't ignore me again please. |
funny how its relevant when an engineer said its a controlled demolition... but not relevant when engineers say it obviously wasn't.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Man that's old news, everyone knows the government destroyed several city blocks of their own country because they wanted insurance money or an excuse to start a war... Let it drop and let's discuss some real issues.
Like for instance, did you know the Lunar Landing was faked?!?!?!?!?!? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
baddog, pleasurepays and warchild, are what politicians in EU call people of "principle". They believe what the corporate media tell them to believe through the television and a few newspapers.
On a psychological level they continually seek the comfort it is to disagree with anyone who questions what the television already told them was the thruth. When you think about it, they stand for the exact opposite that they try to portray. They claim/portray to have and assimilate knowledge, but in reality their knowledge is infinetely thin, because it can only ever come from the tv(the safe place). Some EU politicians talked about taxing bloggers, because it's a cost for the corporate system that people get exposed to viewpoints and science that are not in line with the corporate medias version of events. I find that fucking scary, perhaps even scarier than the notion of terror attacks. NB: when I say corporate media, read: "owned by the few", very few! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A stupid person believes what he is told. An intelligent person asks questions. :2 cents: |
interesting
a true patriot always questions his government |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Once again my point is proven. These conspiracy idiots are simply dumb as fuck. |
So fucking tired of these damned 9/11 threads. Listen I BLEW THE FUCKING BUILDING UP, I ADMIT IT. IT WAS FUCKING ME! There, debate settled, let it fucking go...
|
Excellent post.
Not to mention it's impossible to organize an effort like this. Assume you had enough people, with enough money and time, to actually rig the towers with demo. Let's say it could be done. Now, how do you get all of the people involved to stay quiet? How do you get everyone else involved to stay quiet, look the other way, etc? Building security guards, private security guards from many different companies, employees of many different companies and government agencies, building maintenance people, and so on and so on. All of the people would have to look the other way, so to speak, to allow the conspirators to rig these buildings. Now, after the "controlled demolition". You have security videos from numerous sources. You have police and FBI and many other security groups that would be examining these videos. How do you get all of them to shut up? Also, consider this; after all the engineering work that it would take to design a controlled demo of this size, in two seperate buildings (3 with WTC7), and after getting hundreds if not thousands of people to coordinate their efforts (or at least their involvement and secrecy), over the MONTHS it would take to execute such a plan, and after bringing in TONS of explosives, cables, detonators, wireless networking, timers, etc, and having some way to time the detonation with the impacts of the jets, the operation worked exactly as planned. No foulups, no mistakes, no leaks of information, nothing. Everything was perfectly timed and executed, the hundreds of people involved all stayed quiet, no one made any errors. We all know the US government could NEVER pull off an operation like this. And I'm not talking about vague theories. An effort of this magnitude would leave HUGE amounts of hard evidence. And I'm not talking about "nano thermite" bullshit. "Nano Thermite" reacts chaotically. It does not cut smooth, straight lines. Thermite can be used to cut steel (and is, quite regularly). However, it requires considerable equipment to do so. Large canisters, lots of cables, etc, that "control the burn". "Nano thermite" does not cut steel - it melts it. No "nano thermite" was found in the residue. Sulfer and aluminum oxide was found, and the conspiracy nuts made the huge leap of logic to say it's "nano thermite". Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Echoes dont remove peoples skin Quote:
I have no idea what would cause the explosions in the basement. I am not getting at anything. |
Quote:
To this a conspiracy nut would say "the towers were originally built with explosive materials with the intent to be able to blow them up at a moment's notice blah blah blah" I've actually seen that one. |
"You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity."
- Bullet Tooth Tony |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is all pretty old useless ammo for more mindless bickering... which can be fun. But saying someone doesn't have a mind of their own because they actually want to consider other possibilities seems kinda... uhmm... backwards. |
Quote:
Just saying. |
Quote:
I dont believe the building was in free fall or it was an inside job or that it was a control demo. |
Why do you refuse to answer my question? Is it that hard? It basically shows that you were hinting at bombs in the basement which makes no sense at all and you only figured that out after i pointed it out to you.
Fucking clown. |
Quote:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SGE6GNKNpPA So I guess the FBI are morons too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
An early report, from a correspondent, who says one working theory is a possible car bomb, and you take it as fact and use it as "evidence"? The FBI never said there was a car bomb or any other kind of bomb. They speculated that there may be a car bomb during the initial moments of the crisis. That's long before anyone had any real theories, or conducted any interviews, or.. Use a little common sense! Just because a reporter says something doesn't make it true! |
Quote:
You try to get back at me with that? Seriously, it makes you look even more stupid :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Quote:
So may i ask you once again (third time) what exactly would bombs in the basement be good for? The fact that you never even thought about this before i mentioned it shows exactly how so many conspiracy idiots are well...idiots. From all possible reasons for explosions in the basement they right away come up with the most unlikely one because it fits their theory. Not even thinking about the fact that it makes no sense whatsoever. As long as it fits in their conspiracy (the building was bombed!!!) then it's good enough for people like you. |
Remember - its far easier to label someone an idiot for asking questions - than to actually prove or demonstrate how an all-steel structure can collapse identical to a controlled demolition...using just fire.
|
Quote:
What do bombs do? THEY KILL PEOPLE. Terrorists are trying to KILL PEOPLE. Did the terrorists know the building would fall? Probably not. So they COULD have drove car bombs to the basement, had suicide bombs in the building to KILL PEOPLE. I am not saying they DID. I am just saying their MAY BE more to the story. Jesus Christ. |
Question: If a building falls in the forest and no one's around to hear it,
was it an inside job? |
Quote:
|
Just another coincidence, I'm sure:
|
Nah it wasn't an inside job. The 25 trillion in credit default swaps that disappeared with the buildings, the newly signed 99 year lease and terrorist insurance policy on the condemned buildings, etc. It's all a coincidence. Then you have the pentagon which as stated in that video is one of the most highly secured buildings on earth and we only have 5 frames from one camera? Yeah right. That mother fucker probably has a satellite trained on it 24-7. You can't take a shit anywhere near that place without being watched. Here's another coincidence the section of the Pentagon that was hit was the new offices for the people who were going to investigate the missing trillions of military money. They moved in that day. Just a coincidence.
|
Quote:
|
All this theories can be true cause look like that.Maybe we gonna find out in next few years
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123