![]() |
Quote:
It was lame by the way. I'm not arguing with you or anything. I'm just saying that when I watch porn, I'm not there to see a condom or for that matter anybody "making love" either lol I want to see some major fucking. And the sales I have made from sites I have promoted over the years with my traffic have confirmed that to me. Just like when we opened up claudia-marie.com 2 years ago. I could have went the softcore route...but I KNEW where the money was at and I went and got it. Anyway, it's just my opinion on it. One thing is for sure. Non-condom will outsell condom every minute of the day, every day of the week. And I'm not gonna shoot any condom scenes ever. I kinda hope everybody else does so I can make more money. lol |
Maybe condoms that don't look like there is one on. Just an idea.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So far it's worked out pretty good. If I find it "hot" it seems to sell. The things I find "cold", not so much. I'm pretty sure that how most of us work right? I personally wouldn't watch a condom scene. When I put my marketing cap on the first thing that comes to mind is: "There must be something wrong with either the girl or the guy because they are wearing a rubber" And the second thought I'd have would be: "This sucks" I wouldn't be able to get excited by it at all. Hell, I feel cheated if I watch a scene and the girl doesn't do anal. :1orglaugh I suppose that if a company shot all their scenes with condoms they would have some people maybe buy it. But I know I wouldn't. And I think a large portion of the consumers wouldn't as well. Just my thought. One way or another...if I have any control over it... a condom covered penis will never be seen in anything I shoot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now get your big ass over to Vegas and let's hit the town bro. |
Quote:
http://www.americasbestmyspacecommen...a-wet-suit.jpg Please Robbie, please... :bowdown ADG |
According to the NY DAILY NEWS there is about 55000 people that get AIDS in USA EVERY year, compared to these 16 people during the last 5 years (3-4 per year) in the adult business it does not really appear to be that bad, probably below average of any other industry.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
ADG, before jumping on the drama bandwagon like the LA Times, check facts bro. Out of the 16., they were all either in the gay industry or wanting to join the industry and were denied. So Aim is doing thier job. There was not 1 case in non gay porn.
|
Quote:
"According to a report by researchers Norman Hearst and Stephen Hulley in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the odds of a heterosexual becoming infected with AIDS after one episode of penile-vaginal intercourse with someone in a non-high-risk group without a condom are one in 5 million. With a condom it's even safer--one in 50 million. Just to put this in perspective, the chances of someone in your family getting injured next year in a bubble bath are 1 in 1.3 million (source: The Odds on Virtually Everything, Heron House, 1980). You're in much greater danger of being struck by lightning (1 in 600,000), having your house bombed (1 in 290,000), or being murdered (1 in 11,000). The numbers get a lot worse if you engage in "high-risk behavior"--having sexual intercourse or sharing needles with a member of a high-risk group, e.g., a gay or bisexual male or IV drug user from a major metro area, or a hemophiliac. The chances of getting AIDS from one such encounter range as high as 1 in 10,000 using a condom to 1 in 1,000 unprotected. Even if your partner tests negative for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the chances of infection from a high-risk person are still relatively high--1 in 50,000 without a condom. That's because there's a 45 to 90 day window during which a newly infected person can infect others but test negative. (A few people go as long as 180 days.) From there on out, statistically speaking, things deteriorate pretty fast. If your partner is HIV-positive, your chances of getting AIDS after one night are 1 in 5,000 with a condom, 1 in 500 without. Have sex with an HIV-positive partner 500 times using condoms and your chances escalate to 1 in 11. Skip the gift wrap and they're 2 in 3. A couple points: These odds apply equally to men and women. Although there's reason to believe male-to-female AIDS transmission happens more often than female-to-male, the amount of difference is unknown. Also, I have to emphasize again, the numbers involve a lot of guesswork. The authors admit they could be off by a factor of ten in either direction. Still, one message comes through loud and clear: by far the best thing you can do to avoid AIDS is to be picky about your partners. Use of condoms reduces your risk by a factor of 10, sleeping only with people who test negative reduces it by a factor of 5 to 50, but avoiding high-risk partners reduces it by a factor of 5,000. (You'd also be well advised to avoid high-risk behavior, such as unprotected receptive anal sex.) Asking for a resume may not be romantic, but it beats Kaposi's sarcoma." |
Quote:
Not quite a million billion zillion...but still pretty good. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It was only after the story came out about an additional "16 performers" testing positive that AIM made some clarification. Even with that, not all of the facts are known. I do try to be careful and fact check before making claims, in this case I cited the LA Times as a source, which had cited public health officials. :2 cents: ADG |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc