just beat it!!!!!!!!

No one knows the truth ... since the court acquitted him on all 10 counts in 2005 ... I guess he was not.

There are no secrets anymore :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

i think he has some problems but i dont think he's truly a pedo

Pedo, and only had two good songs with the Jackson 5

You'd have to ask the kid who got paid off, but he ain't talking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...first_marriage

I didn't follow any of the trials so I don't know the details. If he did it, he's a monster. If he didn't do it, it's a disgrace what he was put through.

there was never a shred of evidence so...dont think so but who knows

Def a pedo... no way he would settle out of court for 10s of millions with families if he was innocent...

The thing about Jacko is that normally youd say "no way he would settle out of court if he was innocent" because thats a logical way of looking at it.

Jacko isnt logical as youve seen from the way he behaves, and drugged himself to death. You can make sense of what he did there, it was just his way of escaping his problem.

He's never been proven guilty and I dont believe he was a pedo either, just totally misunderstood.

I have trouble believing why he would pay off 23 million if he was innocent

He was a great artist who influenced generations of artists and influenced pop culture. R.I.P.

I do think he was a pedo but he was all so a great artist.

:)

At least one of them has recently admitted that it was a lie and that he was coached by his mother.

I used to say guilty but now I say innocent.:2 cents:

those parents were feeding him kids
I say FRAMED!!!

I'm in 2 minds about it... we can really only go on what the media tells us.

Is he a disgusting pedo that is unable to sustain a healthy adult heterosexual relationship and so has to resort to fooling with children for gratification (both emotional and sexual), or is his strange adult life the result of a totally fucked up childhood... unusual and somewhat unacceptable behaviour, but not, as someone put it earlier, criminal.

Who knows. *shrug*

Going solely by this, his insurance company allegedly paid the settlement over his objections and the objections of his attorney.

Fixed that for you. I don't care so much anymore... he's dead... can't do anything more to him anyways now. :2 cents:

:2 cents:
quoted for truth.....

A 40 odd year old guy who admitted on camera that he shares his bed with minors. But if you have the money you can get away with murder in some places.

nope, i believe he was too innocent

MJ was found not guilty by a jury of his "peers". But then again so was OJ.

The first or second one?

YES - MJ was a child molester! who paid to walk free

I don't think he was pedofile

I am not really sure, but he had some problems! Mental nature of course. Don't think he was pedo but her definitely had some issues with kids!

Of course he wasn't! A little bit freak, ok, but mot a criminal!

i think is not

Very real possibility. Innocent people don't pay out that type of money of if they're innocent.

I only admire his music.

I do think that he was in a world all to himself - but this whole "Jesus juice" and sleeping in bed etc. along with other incidences do raise questions as to whether he was just lonely as a child an needed playmates or whether he enjoyed the company of younger boys and did have a streak of wanting them for more than what is considered normal.

He kept his sexual life pretty secret but are we able to judge him based on what our current society claims as normal? I don't know. Those who accused him seem to have money on their mind - yet it still doesn't deny the idea that in some cases he did act inappropriately giving them alcohol that was illegal.

I hate accusing someone that I didn't know based on facts that are tabloid generated. If what they say he did was true, then yes he was a pedofile - if not - then history needs to be gentle with him

Honestly it does come to a matter of financial balance sheets. Justice often costs more and if you want to save a few million to clear your name vs. just settling for less then most of us would prefer just paying out than worry what others think especially since you already know that no matter what you do - they will still find something else to accuse you of.

i dont know gay or troubled or both

"based on what our current society claims as normal?"



YIKES!

I think he wasn't. :2 cents:

I think he wasn't!

all i know is that he will always be a part of the world history...may he find true happiness and peace that he's always longing for.

How about this example, Adult webmasters that run Pre-teen and Teen site with models that clear "look" underage. Are those adult webmasters pedo's? those sites are marketed towards men that like underage girls. Because no sane non-pedo adult would google Pre-teens.

no, i think he settled because he was an emotional wreck and just couldn't stand bad publicity. The guy had crazy money and that pulls vultures from all angles, he just handled it very naive... Look at him in interviews, he is like a child himself who seems to have no idea about two faced conmen and women... i bet when someone is really friendly to him he cant comprehend that it's probably just because of his cash.