![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i've beaten MANY attorneys. actually most arn't that bright in my opinion. some are, most arn't and are only concerned with billing.... thus my point - CRIPPLE them with legal fees. |
Quote:
i see nothing wrong with tubes. it's the stealing of content i take issue with. that's what this thread is really about. |
Quote:
keep telling yourself that though. :thumbsup |
Quote:
Did you annexed the US in some war we don’t know about? Did you charge us on lake Huron with your fishing boat/Canadian Navy armada and we surrendered? I smell “mr stupid” here. |
Quote:
someone steals from me, I sue. I'm just throwing ideas out for friends of mine who HAVE had content stolen. |
Quote:
How to Get Your Money If your debtor is unwilling to pay and you know they have the means, it's time to use your local sheriff. You have three options to collect: a bank levy, wage garnishment, or a real estate lien. First, you must obtain proof from your small claims court that you have the right to collect. While the name of the court-issued document varies, it is typically called a writ of execution, writ of garnishment, or writ of attachment. Once you have your writ, give it to your local sheriff with instructions on your collection method. Your sheriff will serve papers on the appropriate institution and collect from your debtor. Seizing money from your debtor's bank accounts is called a bank levy. For this, you need the name of the bank, the account number and the exact name on the account. If the cause of your suit was a business transaction, you may have this information on a credit application. Debtor laws exempt certain accounts from collection. Those include wages, retirement funds and public funds (social security, unemployment). The issue can get even more complicated if the account is joint or shared. The next method to consider is a real estate lien. If the debtor has property, you can claim part of its value. You can create a lien by registering your judgment with the land records office in the county where the debtor owns real estate. A lien requires patience. You won't get any money until the property is sold or transferred since you will be paid from those proceeds. However, if the owner sells the property, you can collect the judgment, plus post-judgment costs and interests. It should be noted that some states limit the amount that can be collected on a real estate lien. The third and easiest way to collect is wage garnishment. If the debtor has a job, you can collect up to 25% of his or her wages until the judgment is paid. Give your sheriff or other local official (known as a levying officer) information about the judgment and where the debtor works. This officer will collect the money and give it to you. There are restrictions, however. If the person can prove the money is being used for basic support, you can't garnish his or her wages. The same goes if they are already subject to another garnishment, are a federal or military employee or are on public support. |
Quote:
|
CAMOKAT I think it's pretty clear to see why they threw you out of law school from your responses :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
just like that eh? But in Canada we just club the seal... You do realize how many "ifs" there is and each one has its own legal issues? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Eighter way there really isn't an arguement here between you and I. We're both correct. As far as CRIPPLEing them, well yes I agree, that just might work. If done in mass lawsuits |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Very...very often defendants do not appear for small claims court so they lose by default. Usually they do not appear because they do not have any intention of paying...and will leave it up to you to go to the expense...effort and cost of trying to collect.
Many small claims court only have a $5,000 dollar max...but some have a $10,000 dollar max...but that is not to say that some states may have a lesser amount or a greater amount. |
What you makes you think the DMCA does not apply in small claims court?
|
dont be worry camokat its not going to happen.
|
Quote:
I was trying to help uou out, my delusional Canadian webmaster… |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
all i see if someone saying - dont' doooo this... no no no - why, cause it doesn't require lawyers to sue someone, and for lawyers - that's BAD BAD BAD actually most lawyers I know seem to be trained from day one in law school to avoid small claims. fact is - small claims has the same collection rights as a supperiour court. |
Quote:
some judges will agree, some won't. all depends on how it's presented. it's a micro MASS approach - not macro one shot. what is more effective at killing? One big cannon ball you can dodge or 100 .22 caliber bullets shot directly at you? people get caught up in BIG GUY itus.... money's in the small accounts - lots of them - suing should be the same way small claims - min legal fees - maximum HURT |
Quote:
|
You people sound more irrational than the RIAA.
|
Quote:
university of manitoba. i live here. i have a BA and a cfp as well as several financial planning degrees from various associations. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
there's more money chasing the small guys cause there's soo many of them, but everyone gets big account itus.... shows stupidity |
Quote:
i'm more into leaning the url....... |
Quote:
I wasn’t trying to say NO to you, just pointing few things out. One, is that it will cost you a lot more than you think. Maybe in Canada it’s a walk.. But Im not in Canada. |
Quote:
gotcha :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and cfp.. |
Quote:
As I stated early your idea is a solution of sorts. |
Quote:
PS: I chose to fail... You never tried.. thats the difference. :1orglaugh |
Im going to a swim.. good night sleezy..
|
Serious business...
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc