![]() |
I raped Raymond's sister!
There... I said it... Ohh, God! I feel so free now. This has been haunting me for years. Now I can finally come out. What are the odds that when I am at my worst this thread would appear and allow me to GET IT ALL OUT??? LOLz/// Jesus H. Christ I feel alive now. Thanks, Joe! |
LIBEL, for fucks sake. LIBEL!!!!!!!!! NOT LIABLE!!! Jesus christ!!!
|
haha this will be my only post in this thread cause i'm tired of the BS..
One good thing about this is it looks like the 3 month ban will now be a lifetime ban for attempting to sue Playboy.. :1orglaugh now we just need a admin to check IPs of "great shooter" and if it's him IP ban him :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Content producers always seem to have the best drama. Coincidence?
|
Quote:
|
I love these comments...
Sue me, bring me down….he is truly too funny. As for Libel and Harassment, I don't think I am guilty of libel or harassment. eddie just did not like what I have had to say and the fact I personally did not agree with him or believe in him. As for Defamation: All it will take is the model/s in question, coming forward which will void any defamation and you can bet they will. On the other hand, eddie contacting me via ICQ to inform me "I know where you are" and "I am coming by” could be considered a threat. His endless convulsions of profanity towards me, via ICQ, could be considered harassment. It was so peaceful around here at work for the past couple of days, until today, when he was back on ICQ with his usual drivel once again. eddie knows and I have told him in the past, what I talk about with my model/s is none of his business. I uphold client confidentiality AND if the model/s give/s permission to disclose this information, then I have no problem with it, but at this time, I do not have permission and I will honor all wishes. The next part of that ICQ that I find a bit disturbing, is that he gets free legal representation because of his indigent status? I and others know he shoots for other companies and could be selling content freelance, so how does this give him rights under indigent status? He is working! I would not be surprised if the State/Court system and/or the IRS looked into his tax records and his income to confirm his indigent status, as providing false information is not too smart, if in fact it is false. I think he pretty much stuck shoe in mouth with that statement. If you're reading this eddie, see you in court....:1orglaugh:1orglaugh And do not contact me via ICQ. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.elevenentertainment.com/gfy/aybgirl1.jpg |
Fitty Bring me Downs:helpme
|
the op hasn't been back and replied, eddie brought him down?
that means playboy and nl are next, watch your asses! |
Quote:
WOW dude!!! What a genius sig. And what a fucked up point by point beating!! If i ever act out of line remind me not to piss you off.lol |
I have never heard of the "victim" in a case being the one to contact the accused regarding a hearing. Ever. It just doesn't happen.
Even if he was representing himself, any notice would be sent through the court through mail or via process server. Not to mention, the state of Arizona isn't going to fund his personal vendetta against these people over "he doesn't like me and is making me look stupid online." And is he suing for Libel or Slander? Because Slander is spoken and Libel is written. It is IMPOSSIBLE to slander someone on the internet. There are a number of possible defenses against libel and slander, but the only one which is an absolute defense is truth. If the statement is true, it cannot be considered libel or slander. So sorry Eddie, but you're SOL if ANYONE comes forward to corroborate any of their claims. And it amazes me how you can claim knowledge about all this stuff without actually being able to spell any of it. |
damn this cat has alot of gfy baggage
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc