I think many Americans still have problems coming to grips with the issue that a few towel heads with pocket knives were able to bring the almighty country to its knees.

the show was a complete flop. I dont believe 99% of the shit the "truthers" spew, but the "documentary" was absurd. They certainy didn't "prove" anything. Most of the evidence and comments from the experts were at best juvenile retorts. Dunno why they didn't approach it better. At one point they blow up this tiny tiny building and then point to detonation cord on the ground and say " see look at all this det. cord, you would have found it in the rubble" hardly scientific. Another common theme is " it would have taken an army of workers to blow the building" . hmm well according to the official version it took just a few guys and some jet fuel.. How big was the "team" in oklahoma ? how big was the team that bombed the wtc the first time ? hmm just a couple guys with a truck you say ? so if a couple guys with a truck filled with explosives can blow a building then its very possible for a small team of guys ( 4 ) to unload a truck filled with explosives.

let me add i dont think the wtc were bombed in any way anyways , but i find the approach to disprove it foolish. Stop spouting the "army of guys needed" to blow wtc. The official version says the fire destroyed one area only , the resulting collapsed floor caused a pancake effect collapsing every floor under it. So lets be clear , according to the official version all you would need to do to blow the wtc is put explosives in 1 particular area .

SO you either believe the wtc couldnt have been bombed without teams of guys and thus the oklahoma bombing wasn't real because we all know just 1 guy did that with no det cord and without even having access to the building . Or you understand the truth.

Yet when someone suggests that it was an inside job, the response is, "Do you realize the number of people it would take to pull something like this off?"

It's more than coming to grips with the issue..

You have lists of structural engineers, physicists, demolition experts, commercial pilots, and on & on that give differing opinions.

You have videos and photos of this & that which support varying sides of the arguments..

You have official reports full of, "the probable cause...", "could have been caused by...", "may have contributed to..."

You have varying eye witness accounts of what they saw and heard.

Nothing has been presented by anyone that will satisfy, without a doubt, the concerns or answer the questions being asked... and if someone did do that very thing, there would still be those who would refuse to believe it, no matter which way the door swung.

Hi DWB,

I dunno.. I've met some pretty smart people in this biz'...!

And of course none of us here know everything, know what "really" happened, or were there. For the most part we saw it on TV like everyone else.

All I am trying to say is that when it comes to hearing both sides of the argument, All I am saying is, is that I am going with the SCIENCE. The PROOF. The Achems Razor. The Simplest answer. Terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into WYC 1 & 2. Fire, started from Jet Fuel, weakened key components enough for both towers to fall. Debris from these damaged WTC enough to destroy it as well. Another Jet hit the Pentagon (Not a cruise missile, please). It's all so simple and makes TOTAL sense.

All the Troofers are crack-heads so this is where all their first hand experience with flames and metal. Probably why they all use glass crack pipes now.

:1orglaugh

I'm not a "conspiracy" believer, but the building #7 video just doesn't make sense to me.

Worldwide you just never see a building fall like this .......

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evide..._collapse2.mpg

.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Christians/Muslims and Jews do the same thing when they try to prove the existence of their god. I think a lot of these people are the same way.

sure... its the exact same thing... nothing more than a simple expression of insecurity and anxiety and a deep rooted need to find personal comfort, make sense of a senseless world and have easy answers to complex and often unanswerable questions. the "facts" are irrelevant and do not preclude the need to express that insecurity and anxiety or find that sense of personal comfort.

and notice the common theme... if your not equally paranoid, insecure, anxious or delusional... then you're "brainwashed by fox news"... what other explanation could there be! thats the final explanation for how you can calmly deal with the world around you :)

Fitty.................. the truth is out there:2 cents: