GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Epoch is asking to see two of my models IDs (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=928823)

mmcfadden 09-22-2009 06:17 PM

3 hundo epoch question

borked 09-22-2009 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16341916)
Is it hard for you people to believe that when you do business with others, they take on risk, for sure in situations like Epoch?
....
But... if in the same time, I can't see how equal respect can't be given to Epoch for supporting our entire Industry and Community that uses them. Making sure they will be around when, stupid shit, goes down... I can support blindly when it's my business on the line too.

OK, I only managed to get to post #174, but I never read anything on the matter, so I'll ask it.

If it's ok for epoch to demand IDs or they will dump you, then where does that put non-US companies that don't fall under the 2257 law? I'm not doing anything wrong by not holding docs on file, so why am I putting Epoch at risk?

Or is epoch only processing for 2257-regulated US companies now?

Iron Fist 09-22-2009 10:27 PM

See sig :) No 2257 required!

Brujah 09-22-2009 10:45 PM

Who processes for Tube sites? Are they 2257 exempt?

Robbie 09-22-2009 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16350949)
Who processes for Tube sites? Are they 2257 exempt?

Yep. As long as they can claim "user upload" they seem to be legally exempt from EVERYTHING. :(

Brujah 09-22-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16350955)
Yep. As long as they can claim "user upload" they seem to be legally exempt from EVERYTHING. :(

I'm not really seeing the down side to running your own Tube filled with stolen, er.. user submitted content then to be honest.

Robbie 09-22-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 16350957)
I'm not really seeing the down side to running your own Tube filled with stolen, er.. user submitted content then to be honest.

There isn't a down side at this point. Of course trying to start one now would be pretty fruitless. The big ones got there firstest with the mostest and have built up a big following.

DWB 09-23-2009 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16350295)
It's kinda like they have hired people to look for this kind of thing...and since it's pretty obvious that is an overwhelming task with hundreds, maybe thousands of sites and hundreds of thousands of images and movies to look at...so the low salary guy who has that job makes sure to ask for a few id's from different sites so he can say to his superior: "Hey look! I verified some more ID's this month. My job is necessary"

If the models in question honestly look underage, I still would not be happy, but I could at least somewhat understand where they were coming from. However, since they are clearly not underage, this means a low level and poorly trained (or brand new) guy flagged them. So how do you trust a new, low level or poorly trained guy, with ANYTHING, if he can not even spot girls who really look underage and know that saggy tits and swollen bellies from having kids, usually doesn't go hand and hand with little underage girls. If a well trained employee was at the wheel, these girls would not be in question.

_Richard_ 09-23-2009 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 16344833)
Here are the two girls in question, who "appear fairly young."

Both have had kids, and both are CLEARLY not underage.

http://digitaldope.com/images/board_...poch_girls.jpg

So please, what is the point in this? Why does "Joe" from "Support" hit me up asking about the IDs of these two girls, when I have girls who look way younger than these two. It doesn't make sense.

So what if I black out the IDs, they can not even verify the IDs are real or who the model really is, so how does this protect Epoch?

DOES ANYONE HERE THINK THESE GIRLS LOOK UNDERAGE?

bump for you

DWB 09-24-2009 02:02 AM

UPDATE:

The only data Epoch will allow to be redacted, is the models address. ALL other information must be shown, along with a signed model release, OR they will terminate ALL processing for my account, including ALL rebills, by September 25, 2009, no later than 5:30pm PST.

<insert "tub girl" photo here>

andrej_NDC 09-24-2009 02:41 AM

This is good info...at least we know to stay away from epoch. How the fuck do they dare to keep your rebills? That would be stealing.

quantum-x 09-24-2009 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 16355637)
UPDATE:

The only data Epoch will allow to be redacted, is the models address. ALL other information must be shown, along with a signed model release, OR they will terminate ALL processing for my account, including ALL rebills, by September 25, 2009, no later than 5:30pm PST.

<insert "tub girl" photo here>

We had the same situation.
Processing on Epoch EU, etc. Was asked for ID for 5 models picked randomly - including photos that had no heads in them.

It's a binary situation: you want to work with Epoch, you have to cough it up. If you object, you don't.

DWB 09-24-2009 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x (Post 16355683)
We had the same situation.
Processing on Epoch EU, etc. Was asked for ID for 5 models picked randomly - including photos that had no heads in them.

It's a binary situation: you want to work with Epoch, you have to cough it up. If you object, you don't.

What did you do? The headless models... classic.

I started out hell bent against it. Then I thought, well, if I can black everything out but the face and DOB, there could be nothing bad come of that. I even figured I would let them do something the FBI is not allowed to do. But that wasn't good enough.

Honestly, if the girls in question actually looked underage, I can see where they are coming from. But those girls, it just throws a red flag to me.

BigDeanEvans 09-24-2009 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 16355707)
What did you do? The headless models... classic.

I started out hell bent against it. Then I thought, well, if I can black everything out but the face and DOB, there could be nothing bad come of that. I even figured I would let them do something the FBI is not allowed to do. But that wasn't good enough.

Honestly, if the girls in question actually looked underage, I can see where they are coming from. But those girls, it just throws a red flag to me.

Shitty situation and i have been there except it was the FEDS, so naturally i didn't have a choice :Oh crap ( which turned out it was a false accusation by a mother of a model) but i would have just sent them over without stirring up any shit. I don't know about you, but my processors hold a lot of my money, so it wouldn't have even given it a second thought. I would have just blacked out the address and faxed them over.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123