![]() |
You can't leave. You got 10,646 posts already. Chances are you'll keep posting on this board for a long time.
|
Quote:
Jay if you want to leave so badly, then do it. You sold your network, just leave, get out. Do what makes you happy, just stop bringing everyone else down with you. It's not adapt or die, it's innovate or die. Too many people got complacent with Adapt and never Innovate. |
If you do business in any other industry, you will find it isn't much different.
I once had to sue a millionaire for $800 I fronted him merchandise for that he sold and kept the money. I won, but by the time I collected my profit was about $50. it isn't this industry, its people. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2009: "That's adorable! You still buy CDs?" 2015: "That's adorable! You still watch porn on websites on your computer?" Digital content is easily transportable by design. You can't put the cat back in the bag. Technology caught up, predictably, and made it possible to put a terabyte in your pocket. Like you might pine for the days of no free porn, the RIAA pines for the days of forcing people to buy an hour of filler for the 3 minutes of killer. Look at iTunes and its rivals: for 99 cents you can download almost any song you like. It corrects a broken system, forcing the product to catch up with technology. So now there's just a NEW group of middlemen with new and better channels to consumers' wallets. And those consumers are HAPPY to pay for it! EVEN THOUGH they could get it for free via P2P solutions! The problem for the establishment, the labels and distributors, is that it limits their relevance and opportunity. They have become irrelevant. They will die. When NetFlix and iTunes offer porn, we are DEAD. Until then, who will step in and be the NEW middleman for porn? If you're a middleman -- and by operating websites you are -- then keep your eyes open. The DMCA-rattling tubes are doing it in an ugly way, but they are winning hearts and minds. They are building brands that can become NetFlix or iTunes of porn by the time legislation catches up with reality (such that the harbor is made not so safe). So I wonder... is it possible to build a VOD/NetFlix/iTunes-ish channel WITHOUT becoming a legislatively blessed stolen goods warehouse? Or is it TOO LATE??? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
fiddddeeee rat bastards!
|
Fiddy One Lace panties.
:disgust |
Quote:
|
When I started in 98, Amateur Pages was one of the best sponsors and it was dam easy to get banned from them unless you were doing volume sales, even back in 98 if you could send 50+ sales a day there was never a mention of how you achieved that or were you questioned. Once you hit a certain numbers of sales rules no longer applied.
|
Quote:
and lets not forget about the crescent publishing rip off or the guy who took the charter pacific cc black list and used to bang it out on sites that didn't use them as a merchant. but all that was pre 2002, so most ppl don't know or forget |
The problem is DMCA makes it legal to steal.
So people with ethics are saying, "Hey, don't steal, don't steal, it's not right." While the people who are stealing are saying, "F-you, It's legal. I'm going to keep stealing." |
Quote:
In other news, I am launching iPoons next week and I am looking for exclusive online distribution deals. You MUST refer 10 friends or the whole thing will go down in flames! |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
If that is, I will make sure to cut the remianing traffic I do send off. My account is 10262. Look it up. :321GFY |
Quote:
I'm not religious, but last time I checked it was #8 on the list of 10 things you shouldn't do. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Jay isn't "bringing everyone else down with him", that is just wrong to say:2 cents:
he tells it like it is, and his posts are outstanding and real and are always worth reading here :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America http://www.amazon.com/Bright-sided-R...f=cm_cd_f_pb_i Best book I've read since Freakonomics. Having a positive outlooks when there is nothing to be positive about is harmful. Being REALISTIC is always better than drowning in phony optimism. :2 cents: |
Quote:
Run the same ol' website models that worked in 2001... and bleed marketshare 'til you're dead? I have some great drama unfolding in a fantasy football league. It's a keeper league full of die-hards, so attrition is nearly 0%-- in other words, people don't quit the league; it's been running for years. This makes future draft picks trade-worthy assets. However, the current rules do not put a limit on the number of draft picks you can obtain-- so one guy, his team already out of contention, maneuvered to grab four 5th round draft picks next year by dumping his best players to the teams still in contention. This gives the guy an advantage next year over all 11 of his opponents-- not just an advantage over the 3 opponents who traded him draft picks. Long-term, this is not unfair, because any team has the same opportunity, but short-term, it adds HUGE variance. Most of the league agrees that this short-term, year-by-year variance takes away from the fun of the league. So we'll probably vote to make it so only one draft pick can be obtained in trades per season. However, since the rules have not yet changed -- the commissioner's philosophy is not to amend rules during a season -- that means I'd be a SUCKER not to take advantage of them, otherwise I am just bleeding away my opportunity to win next year. My team had also fallen out of playoff contention. So, I managed to extract even more value in similar trades than the first guy-- and I slammed the door on the market, as the playoff contenders have mortgaged enough of their future already. And now I'm the villain instead of the douchebag who started it :1orglaugh. What else can I do? I WANT TO WIN. Do I let the guy with four 5th rounders eat me alive next year? Or go Sun Tzu on his ass (and the rest of the league's) and attack attack attack rather than wait for the rules to catch up? |
Quote:
|
I'm with you Jay.
This new class of 2009 is scary. I am almost at the point where I want to tell most of these fucktards to fuck off. |
the game has changed for sure.
|
Quote:
I don't have a plan for this yet so don't ask me how :1orglaugh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Dude, didn't you just shake hands with the biggest crook ever? No, I shook hands with Bernie Madoff. Funny shit man, funny shit. |
For what it's worth, many industries around the world are on their death beds.
|
Quote:
If you did a contest where someone joined Fling, AFF, and Sex In Your City to see who got laid first, I don't think there is any question you would score on AFF first. There are way more fake profiles in the competition, so your argument holds no water. |
Quote:
But listen man, I'm just speaking my mind. Very few people here would pass up an offer to sell to AFF if they were selling something and AFF were the highest bidder. Just human nature. I'm just sayin, maybe your initial post could be answered by looking inside yourself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
since when was this an industry of moral dignity?
|
ASM-
We didn't train anyone- we sat back and watched this happen. Apathy kills. The most important thing to understand is that we are not alone- The MPAA is hurting recording industry is hurting as well from torrents and file sharing. Until there is something done to combat thieves from overseas, there is nothing more you can do. These safe havens for criminals should be blown up or completely blocked by ISP's here in the US. It sucks and I only have one answer on how to thwart people frmo downloading illegal files and going to tube sites. The only problem is that no one here will fund me and my ideas which I think can work given my resources to the media They will all wait until they see someone else comes forward and does it. Copycats and apathetic losers are abound |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123