GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Impressive Review Site (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=942723)

pixovore 12-10-2009 02:29 AM

Just checked a random review.
=
Super tutorial on how to uncheck the prechecked upsales

It will give heads up to a lot of customers on this

:thumbsup

pocketkangaroo 12-10-2009 02:39 AM

Text review sites are text for a reason. They want search traffic and it's how they bring in almost all their traffic. While they both call themselves review sites, they are targeting completely different demographics and traffic sources.

I think it's a cool concept and looks well done. My only gripe would be the length of the reviews. I just don't see myself sitting through a 10 minute review on a porn site. If you're deciding between 3 sites in a niche, do you really want to spend the next half hour listening to a guy talk about the sites? I'm sure there are some people that do and it will cater to them, but I'd like a little more fast paced review.

crockett 12-10-2009 02:42 AM

Interesting concept and sure that site will be popular fast, but how are they making money? I clicked through a few links and I didn't see any affiliate codes..

Horny Joe 12-10-2009 02:48 AM

This is GOOD thinking!

My next project will be a review site where the surfers can see how quickly I get an orgasm masturbating to the site.... ;)

Paul Markham 12-10-2009 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony (Post 16631626)
If this site was out there back in the late 90's, we wouldn't have the issues we have now.

To blatantly steal the quote, "It's like the Better Business Bureau" for Porn sites.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Over that length of time many sponsors have regarded this industry as a way to get rich quick or put the wrong person at the top of the priorities list.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeXus (Post 16631629)
So.... your implying less people pay due to lack of trust in the industry? Of course, it would have nothing to do with the influx of free videos from tube sites and the like, right? Sounds like the cat calling the kettle black buddy.

Wrong. If with $30.00 a month sign up we can't offer the member more than a place to download video and truly compete with Tubes that's our fault. It's not that Tubes are free, it's that Tubes are better that make them so bad for us.

NBBCash Matze 12-10-2009 02:55 AM

it's a great idea, it offers a wide walkthrough and shows how the products really are. Hoes has some similar stuff since a few months I think but not a review with commentary just a walkthrough with music in the background. Good job!

Max_PuZcash 12-10-2009 03:33 AM

yes impressive... also you can't just copy the concept

Paul Markham 12-10-2009 03:47 AM

I looked at a few of the reviews and the concept is awesome. Finding out about the "problem" sites can do nothing but good to the industry. My small criticism is it's a webmasters review rather than a porn buyers review. No where did I see a review of the porn quality of the content. They need to download some of the videos and see how good they are to the porn buyer ie the videos wank ability.

Without that it's like a restaurant review without tasting the meal.

Still an improvement on many review sites, the girl at the beginning gets a bit repetitive after a while.

The true test of the site will be how many of the viewers come back for their next sign up. Getting new traffic is good, keeping it buying is best.

jigg 12-10-2009 03:54 AM

nice
but why are they using RED cameras for online video?!

kane 12-10-2009 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 16632129)
I looked at a few of the reviews and the concept is awesome. Finding out about the "problem" sites can do nothing but good to the industry. My small criticism is it's a webmasters review rather than a porn buyers review. No where did I see a review of the porn quality of the content. They need to download some of the videos and see how good they are to the porn buyer ie the videos wank ability.

Without that it's like a restaurant review without tasting the meal.

Still an improvement on many review sites, the girl at the beginning gets a bit repetitive after a while.

The true test of the site will be how many of the viewers come back for their next sign up. Getting new traffic is good, keeping it buying is best.

I noticed some of that too. He would download the movie, just to see how fast the download speed was then close it. There was no comment on if the content was any good or not nor was there any mention of the video quality. Of course I only watched a few reviews, maybe he does that on some of the other reviews.

If I were going to a review site I want to know if the site has in it what the tour promises, but I also want to know if the movies and pictures are any good.

Arnox 12-10-2009 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 16632053)
Text review sites are text for a reason. They want search traffic and it's how they bring in almost all their traffic. While they both call themselves review sites, they are targeting completely different demographics and traffic sources.

I think it's a cool concept and looks well done. My only gripe would be the length of the reviews. I just don't see myself sitting through a 10 minute review on a porn site. If you're deciding between 3 sites in a niche, do you really want to spend the next half hour listening to a guy talk about the sites? I'm sure there are some people that do and it will cater to them, but I'd like a little more fast paced review.

The problem with this is you're not actually a surfer. You wouldn't spend half an hour online looking for the 'perfect' one to join because you probably have better things to do with your time on the PC.

There are millions of people out there who devote 10+ hours a day playing online video games, chances are they're not going to be fussed about 30 minutes of a website review.

CruelMedia 12-10-2009 04:32 AM

It's a good thing.. concept.. userfriendly..
It's gonna do great for those who are interested in what they pay for.. aaaaaaa.. who isn't..?!
It's a plus for the industry..:2 cents::thumbsup

k0nr4d 12-10-2009 04:51 AM

as i told the owner of the site, this is the first good unique idea i have seen in a while, and im exposed to alot of ideas beign a coder...

Matyko 12-10-2009 04:53 AM

saw this @ MP, posted by Shemp. Excellent. Finally, some real progress...

Paul Markham 12-10-2009 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 16632144)
I noticed some of that too. He would download the movie, just to see how fast the download speed was then close it. There was no comment on if the content was any good or not nor was there any mention of the video quality. Of course I only watched a few reviews, maybe he does that on some of the other reviews.

If I were going to a review site I want to know if the site has in it what the tour promises, but I also want to know if the movies and pictures are any good.

Is the problem due to too many webmasters look at buyers as just surfers?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox (Post 16632148)
The problem with this is you're not actually a surfer. You wouldn't spend half an hour online looking for the 'perfect' one to join because you probably have better things to do with your time on the PC.

There are millions of people out there who devote 10+ hours a day playing online video games, chances are they're not going to be fussed about 30 minutes of a website review.

I believe the buyer of online porn today is prepared to invest a little time in finding the site he wants to join for 30 days. He's probably a repeat buy, probably been ripped off before and now very wary.

If he only has 30 minutes to spend he might be better off on a Tube site.

We need to separate surfers from buyers, this site goes toward it.

Roald 12-10-2009 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trax (Post 16631989)
video review idea is not new. in fact i did videopornreviews.com years ago on a different scale. turns out people prefer screenshots of the members area over watching an actual flash video. i know mantas and rick do not need to be worried and i doubt they are. nicely done but just another site.

Had the idea of screenrecording the membersarea 2 years ago too. We even did 1 for Brazzers http://videos.freeones.com/files/v_v...h01/index.html

Didn't make a big diffrence from what we saw either.

Nicely done though, gotte give 'm that :thumbsup

MasterBlow 12-10-2009 06:31 AM

impressive for who? rookie surfers? blaming other porn review sites and whole porn industry? hackers could be very busy these days...

BlackCrayon 12-10-2009 06:37 AM

pretty cool but seems like a waste of a good mainstream domain.

Pipecrew 12-10-2009 06:37 AM

Great idea and high production value.

1) how much are they in the hole already from producing all this?
2) how long will people stay and watch? The average tube guy with a free 20 minute movie is staying a max 4 min

will be interesting to see, I look forward to seeing this concept pan out

escoman 12-10-2009 06:53 AM

I wonder if they will make a webmaster program like rabbits reviews. Send traffic to their reviews and they may take a few % of the clicks. Might work if they convert well.

JamesK 12-10-2009 07:04 AM

Rule #1 - Do not educate the surfer

TheDoc 12-10-2009 07:05 AM

Nice idea...

From what I can tell they don't actually signup for your site, they fake the process then fake as if they care.

It won't take a surfer long to figure out the site is just another review site.

Thomas007 12-10-2009 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeXus (Post 16631589)
By the time it takes to pick a site and watch a review, I could have signed up from a text review site, jerked off, and canceled membership...

I agree.

NetHorse 12-10-2009 07:21 AM

I'm going to create a review site for threads on GFY, I give this thread 2 out of 2 tits. Seriously though, that's a nice review site!

http://www.christianmontoya.com/wp-c...doms/props.jpg

NetHorse 12-10-2009 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas007 (Post 16632453)
I agree.

Of course you agree, you own a text based review site. 1/2 out of 2 tits for your post.

Thomas007 12-10-2009 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetHorse (Post 16632460)
Of course you agree, you own a text based review site. 1/2 out of 2 tits for your post.

:-)

The concept is good. they just need to refine it so it's a little faster to locate a review you would like to watch.
Right now you can only choose a review to watch based the niche and the name of the site.

How do you on Live Reviews find the best amateur site to join?

Thomas007 12-10-2009 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetHorse (Post 16632459)
I'm going to create a review site for threads on GFY, I give this thread 2 out of 2 tits. Seriously though, that's a nice review site!

Please go ahead and make a site which daily lists the best threads on GFY.
That will save a lot of people a lot of time.

There used to be a site like that, but for some reason they stopped doing it.

SteveHardeman 12-10-2009 07:40 AM

Wow, best of luck to whomever started that site. I love it. I love seeing innovative ideas and people taking the time to implement them. There's a tremendous difference between thinking of an idea and actually implementing the idea. (think Bill Gates) And this one looks like a winner in my eyes.

Trying to think like a surfer, I believe I would bookmark this site and check it every time I considered joining a porn site. Seems incredibly labor intensive so I hope their hard work is rewarded. In fact, I may make a few blog posts about this site just to generate a little extra traffic for them.

Yes, I think the reviews are a bit long but I'm assuming the site is relatively new and they will apply feedback to make the site better over time. And, obviously, they've reviewed about 1% of the sites that the well-known review sites have so they've got a lot of work ahead of them. Best of luck to the owners. I look forward to a few years down the line when the National Championship football game is being playing in the "LiveReviews.com Fiesta Bowl." :-)

DamianJ 12-10-2009 08:11 AM

I just launched a review site too! It features my friend CARL and ME on my couch drinking beer and reviewing porn.

Slightly lower budget that this one, but I hope, slightly more amusing too.

www.pornbeer.com

Paul Markham 12-10-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesK (Post 16632430)
Rule #1 - Do not educate the surfer

Rule #2 - Educate the buyer as much as possible.
Tall him what sites are not worth money, going to rip him off or spam his email. Until this industry learns a pissed off customer is likely to become a lost customer we will continue to struggle.

Zorgman 12-10-2009 09:06 AM

pornbeer. Thats fucken funny. :D

DamianJ 12-10-2009 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorgman (Post 16632784)
pornbeer. Thats fucken funny. :D

Thanks man. Just trying to do something different.

beemk 12-10-2009 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeXus (Post 16631764)
You have proof to back this up?

yeah, common sense backs this up.

SGS 12-10-2009 09:36 AM

Very impressive and about time there was something new in this business.

Pornbeer is great too of course. ;)

Relentless 12-10-2009 09:39 AM

Very nice looking site. I hope it is being ethically managed.
There is always room for a high quality site in any niche, reviews or otherwise.

There are a few minor things that they could do which would make it a much more profitable model. It's in beta so hopefully they are already working on those things. If the owner is reading this post contact me at ICQ# 266942896 and I'll show you exactly what I'm talking about.

The biggest problem the site will have is updating the reviews. Customers will want to see reviews that are current, scam site owners will add their scams after the review is posted saying there are no scams... and going back to redo a video review will be costly in terms of time and money. If their goal is the clean up the industry and out the scammers I love it. If their goal is to turn a profit, that will be a much more difficult objective to reach. :2 cents:

baddog 12-10-2009 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox (Post 16632148)
The problem with this is you're not actually a surfer. You wouldn't spend half an hour online looking for the 'perfect' one to join because you probably have better things to do with your time on the PC.

There are millions of people out there who devote 10+ hours a day playing online video games, chances are they're not going to be fussed about 30 minutes of a website review.

:thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 16632352)
pretty cool but seems like a waste of a good mainstream domain.

Nothing says it can't evolve into reviews of both.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16632434)
Nice idea...

From what I can tell they don't actually signup for your site, they fake the process then fake as if they care.

It is my understanding that they do actually sign up for the site, with a fresh credit card each time. To me, that is the most impressive part.

To those that mock this format, I have a feeling you have tunnel vision and/or do not pay attention to what is going on around you. This format makes millions for mainstream companies.

GeXus 12-10-2009 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beemk (Post 16632857)
yeah, common sense backs this up.

Something you clearly lack if you can't spot sarcasm.

GeXus 12-10-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 16632766)
Rule #2 - Educate the buyer as much as possible.
Tall him what sites are not worth money, going to rip him off or spam his email. Until this industry learns a pissed off customer is likely to become a lost customer we will continue to struggle.

Paul it must be nice living in fantasy land. How's the weather?

It sounds very noble to speak of "educating the buyer", etc. But let's get down to brass tacks, money is made on the ignorant, not the educated. It has nothing to do with trust or credibility, that's been thrown out the window long ago, now the battle is with free content. I think you can guess who will win. This isn't mainstream. People pay for services like Netflix/Blockbuster/Amazon onDemand because their service is just far superior to finding ripped movies, waiting for the download, sacrificing quality, risk getting thrown in jail... This isn't the case in porn. Not to mention I'm not watching a 2 hour porn movie, I'm watching a 5min clip, jerking off, going to sleep.

dirtybaker1331 12-10-2009 09:55 AM

This is a great site that looks like a lot of time and dedication was put into it. I cant wait to get a Naughty America review up there. The industry is always evolving and its nice to see some innovation from affiliates. I like!

dpl girls 12-10-2009 10:00 AM

The reviews are too mechanical IMO.

As was stated above - what about the content?

The first review mentioned was Rachel Aziani so I sat through it and it didn't tell me shit abotu the site other than the download speed, really.

What a surfer really needs to know about that site is a) Rachel is fucking hot. b) Rachel has amazing jugs that you get to see bouncing all over the place. c) Rachel runs the site herself and she's a doll. d) Rachel does some hardcore with her hubby and it's awesome. d) Rachel also does a lot of solo stuff and it's lava hot in the following ways: a, b, c, etc.

What you have here is a movie review site that doesn't tell you shit about the movie beyond its running time and the size of the theatre you can see it in.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc