Twisted Dave |
01-01-2010 10:34 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArsewithClass
(Post 16701263)
You took this picture didnt you? I like it, it is tastefull! :thumbsup
I agree... Or at least tits that bounce, move or can be squeezed.
Bollocks! She has "A"s or small "B"s at the largest! Natalie has large "B"s of which are a lot bigger. They do not sag unless a woman has huge boobs. Dont be so defensive over your lady. Appreciate her qualities and not bullshit about her quantities. :2 cents:
So she shot the cat in the link that you added in your original post to this thread?
|
She shot all the images ... she has a studio setup with remote camera gear so she can do all the shots. I'd have blurred the pics I'm so shit at taking photo's.
You can't comment on the size of her breasts from a picture that shows them from the side and round the body slightly ... as you can see, you can't even see much of the nipple. So for your comments about the size, and how you're clearly saying I'm making it up ... take it back please :) I have zero reasons to lie. She wears a B cup bra size and fills it very well. Either that or every store here in the UK where she buys the bra's are mis-labelling the bra's. I appreciate Perrie a lot, and looking at her breasts there, you can see I don't have to make shit up. She has perfect tits. 90% of tits in a D cup or more sag a lot more than smaller breasts ... it's called gravity. That's a fact. You work in porn, so you're looking at a small percentage of girls who get hired because they don't sag as much, or they have fake ones. I've seen enough tits in my life to know :)
Again, regarding the shots, the cat was taken by her. All her photo's are done by her.
|