GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Super Bowl - Colts or Saints? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=952414)

MrGroper 02-07-2010 05:51 AM

anybody said superblow?

Fletch XXX 02-07-2010 06:04 AM

Geaux saints!!!!

J. Falcon 02-07-2010 06:56 AM

Colts will win.

Fletch XXX 02-07-2010 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 16822158)
Reality is the Saints have been dissed by the sports media since day one of the playoffs-
media says cardinals beat saints-
media says vikings beat saints- (btw, saints scored 31 points against the 6th ranked defense in the NFL)

reality- sports media does NOT like the saints

glad someone said it... ive noticed too.

even as a non football fan but a Saints fan I can see it. I only like the Saints because i am bortn and raised New Orleans native, howeer, I can see that the Saints have always gotten the shit end of the media.

Even after reaching the Superbowl people still act like they suck LOL its like they wont admit the Saints are good enough to go to Superbowl

The Demon 02-07-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16821887)
comparing teams based off of like opponents, only 2 weeks apart, both home games, with all players healthy in those games is retarded logic? That is the best comparison of all except for playing each other.

Yes, it's retarded logic, because the Colts have been missing 20 players all season, and that sports are all about matchups. You're basically saying, "because the Bucs beat the Saints and the Saints beat the Patriots by more than the Colts did, the Bucs and Saints both can beat the Colts". And that is retarded logic.

Quote:

What is retarded is to go on and on about how the colts rested their players but then say the saints lost their last 3 games. News flash, the saints rested most of their starters for the last game they lost, brees among other players didn't even take a snap. So thats 2 games they lost, but they pretty much had it all locked up towards the end and took their foot off the gas.
Love the excuses. Actually, the Saints didn't rest their starters against the Bucs. Try again.


Quote:

You got me there, the colts have the better record, they are 16-2, the Saints are 15-3. :upsidedow lol that proves everything. :warning
As opposed to "LOLZ SAINTS BEAT THE PATS BY MORE THAN THE COLTS DID SO THEY WILL WIN!!"

Quote:

How about the games that Indy was trying to win:
Beat Jacksonville by 2 points
Beat Miami by 4 points
Beat 49ers by 4 points
Beat Houston by 3 points
Beat Patriots by 1 point
Beat Ravens by 2 points
Beat Jacksonville by 4 points

Thats 7 games they won by a total of 20 points.

The Saints had 2 games they won by 3 points, 1 game by 5 points, all other games they won by 8 points or more.
It is quite obvious that you have no knowledge of football, much less any sport, and just throw in random facts to prove that you have no real understanding. Thanks for playing.

will76 02-07-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 16822158)
Reality is the Saints have been dissed by the sports media since day one of the playoffs-
media says cardinals beat saints-
media says vikings beat saints- (btw, saints scored 31 points against the 6th ranked defense in the NFL)

reality- sports media does NOT like the saints

Manning MVP????

How is this possible?

STATS
Touchdowns
Brees 34 , Manning 33

Interceptions
Brees 11 , Manning 16

Passing Yards
Brees 4,388, Manning 4,500

Yards Per Pass
Brees 8.5 , Manning 7.9

Passer Rating
Brees 109.6 , Manning 99.9
(Brees' rating is the seventh best of all time.)

Completion Percentage
Brees 70.6, Manning 68.8

Final analysis - Manning a great quarterback this season, Brees BETTER

:thumbsup

Even in the playoffs this year Manning has 5 TDs and 1 INT to Brees' 6 TDs 0 INTs... but they all talk about how good Manning has been in the playoffs this year but don't mention Brees at all.

Since 2006 (the last 4 seasons) Brees is #1 in passing yards - more than Manning. They both are tied at #1 with 122 TDs. Manning has been playing a few more years and his life time stats are better, but I just don't understand how they can dis Brees so bad when he has done as good or better than Manning in the last 4 years since he has been with the Saints. If Brees would have had a better defense in years past he would have made the superbowl every year, can't knock him for not having superbowl wins because he has had bad defenses.

The Demon 02-07-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 16822158)
Reality is the Saints have been dissed by the sports media since day one of the playoffs-
media says cardinals beat saints-
media says vikings beat saints- (btw, saints scored 31 points against the 6th ranked defense in the NFL)

reality- sports media does NOT like the saints

Manning MVP????

How is this possible?

STATS
Touchdowns
Brees 34 , Manning 33

Interceptions
Brees 11 , Manning 16

Passing Yards
Brees 4,388, Manning 4,500

Yards Per Pass
Brees 8.5 , Manning 7.9

Passer Rating
Brees 109.6 , Manning 99.9
(Brees' rating is the seventh best of all time.)

Completion Percentage
Brees 70.6, Manning 68.8

Final analysis - Manning a great quarterback this season, Brees BETTER

Ah yes, because stats are the end all be all of MVP determination. Gotta love the ignorance.

The Demon 02-07-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16821895)
I hope the "dirty" saints kick the shit out of Manning, knock his teeth out... all legit hits though. I can see it now if they touch him wrong the refs are going to be throwing flags.

I also think Manning is going to throw a few picks... Would be nice if we can beat them 45 - 21 :)

I see you have your excused prepared when the Colts win. I'll be waiting for your "refs cheated" posts postgame.

Itchy 02-07-2010 09:01 AM

New Orleans Saints!!

will76 02-07-2010 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16822429)
Yes, it's retarded logic, because the Colts have been missing 20 players all season, and that sports are all about matchups. You're basically saying, "because the Bucs beat the Saints and the Saints beat the Patriots by more than the Colts did, the Bucs and Saints both can beat the Colts". And that is retarded logic.

Love the excuses. Actually, the Saints didn't rest their starters against the Bucs. Try again.



As opposed to "LOLZ SAINTS BEAT THE PATS BY MORE THAN THE COLTS DID SO THEY WILL WIN!!"


It is quite obvious that you have no knowledge of football, much less any sport, and just throw in random facts to prove that you have no real understanding. Thanks for playing.


You are comical. I never said if one teams beats another, who beats another blah blah then that team would win.

I said the best way to compare which team is better (unless they actually played each other) is to see how they played against a common opponent. HOWEVER, if one played them at home, the other on the road, or it was at different times of the year, or if weather conditions were bad for 1 but not the other, of if one team had hurt players for one of the games, etc.. then it wouldn't be a fair comparison to use.

This isn't the end fucking all on who is going to win, but a good guage. If i am retarded for mentioning this then so are many sports writers who cited how the colts did real well against the rams but the saints didn't win by much. However those are not like games, the saints had a lot of players out for the rams game.

You can't get a better comparison than the Saints vs Patriots and Colts vs Patriots game.
- Both games were home games.
- Both were nationally telivised games.
- Both were indoors (weather conditions the same).
- Both had teams (including patriots) had all of their main starters healthy and playing
- Both games happened with in two weeks of each other.

You will never find a better comparison game then that where all things are equal.

BTW, I never said the Saints rested their starters against the bucs. I said they rested their starters in thier LAST game of the year, which was against the panthers. You said the Saints lost their last 3 games, but you FAILED to mention that one of them they rested their starters, it was the panthers game. :321GFY And the Saints lost againts the Bucs in OT, after missing a FG.

When I take a shit, my turd knows more about football then you do. Can't wait to see your Manning boy get flattened today.

The Demon 02-07-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16822457)
You are comical. I never said if one teams beats another, who beats another blah blah then that team would win.

I said the best way to compare which team is better (unless they actually played each other) is to see how they played against a common opponent. HOWEVER, if one played them at home, the other on the road, or it was at different times of the year, or if weather conditions were bad for 1 but not the other, of if one team had hurt players for one of the games, etc.. then it wouldn't be a fair comparison to use.

If I'm comical then you're definitely priceless. This isn't college football where you can gauge the strength of the teams based on a common opponent. This a professional league where it's all about matchups. And I'm glad you brought up hurt players, since the Colts have been missing 13 starters all season.

Quote:

This isn't the end fucking all on who is going to win, but a good guage. If i am retarded for mentioning this then so are many sports writers who cited how the colts did real well against the rams but the saints didn't win by much. However those are not like games, the saints had a lot of players out for the rams game.
Good for the sports writers. I don't see ESPN Analysts or knowledgeable people using this as a reason for the colts to win.

Quote:

You can't get a better comparison than the Saints vs Patriots and Colts vs Patriots game.
- Both games were home games.
- Both were nationally telivised games.
- Both were indoors (weather conditions the same).
- Both had teams (including patriots) had all of their main starters healthy and playing
- Both games happened with in two weeks of each other.
Of course you can. One team ended up playing shitty, one ended up playing better. If you really want to do these retarded comparisons, we can look at the Saints losing 3 straight, while I believe 1 or 2 were at full strength, whereas the Colts haven't lost while playing all their starters for the entire game.

Quote:

BTW, I never said the Saints rested their starters against the bucs. I said they rested their starters in thier LAST game of the year, which was against the panthers. You said the Saints lost their last 3 games, but you FAILED to mention that one of them they rested their starters, it was the panthers game. :321GFY And the Saints lost againts the Bucs in OT, after missing a FG.
I didn't have to mention it, because the Saints didn't rest their starters for all 3 games, ergo they lost while their starters were playing. Yes, make excuses why they lost, you're good at that.

Quote:

When I take a shit, my turd knows more about football then you do. Can't wait to see your Manning boy get flattened today.
Well, judging by your ignorance, stupidity, and lack of football knowledge, you'll be back here to tell us how the refs cheated.

will76 02-07-2010 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16822443)
I see you have your excused prepared when the Colts win. I'll be waiting for your "refs cheated" posts postgame.


I am sure its going to happen, you talk bad about golden boy Manning and they will throw a flag. It's going to happen. But the Saints will still win. Actually I think its going to be a crying Colts fan excuse why the lost, because they going stay the Saints were dirty.


Hey :321GFY you and the colts. Can't wait to get this started.



http://www.abc26.com/media/thumbnail...8-07092022.JPG

What we did to Warner: RETIRED HIM!

http://media.nola.com/saints_impact/...d265_large.jpg

What we did to Farve: RETIRED HIM!

http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0124...ntsdts_576.jpg


Where you hidding Manning, getting scared yet? Going to knock his teeth out :thumbsup

The Demon 02-07-2010 09:16 AM

I'm sure you're going to be humoring this forum when you're bitching and moaning about the refs. You probably would have done that two weeks ago had the Vikings won the game in which they dominated virtually every statistic.


And LOL@Saints claiming they retired those two quarterbacks. That's like saying Favre got the entire Saints defense fired for his 450+ yards.

will76 02-07-2010 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16822471)


Good for the sports writers. I don't see ESPN Analysts or knowledgeable people using this as a reason for the colts to win.


you were fun to play with, now you are a total waste of time. It's like arguing with a child who keeps saying " i know you are but what am I". However much you want to disagree with what I am saying here is something you can't disagree with:

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/colum...spor tCat=nfl

So you say you can't find any ESPN analysts using "common opponents" as a reason why the Colts will win ??

Quote:

Fifteen mostly indisputable reasons the Colts will win Super Bowl XLIV:

2. Common crummy opponent

The Saints beat the worst team in the league -- the St. Louis Rams -- on the road by five points.

The Colts beat them on the road by 36 points.

Gene Wojciechowski is the senior national columnist for ESPN.com
That idiot used it as his NUMBER 2 reason. Why he picked that game is what is retarded. Indy came off of a bye week and had 2 weeks to prepare for the Rams, the Saint didn't and played with several players hurt. The Patriots game is a much much better game to use, but it didn't fit into his bs 15 reason logic of why the colts will win.

just proves even more my turds know more about football then you. I am off to the french quarter to watch the game and ready to party all night long. Feel free to keep making up excuses and reply here.

Go Saints :thumbsup

The Demon 02-07-2010 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16822504)
you were fun to play with, now you are a total waste of time. It's like arguing with a child who keeps saying " i know you are but what am I". However much you want to disagree with what I am saying here is something you can't disagree with:

So I've already called you humorous and you respond with....The exact same thing? And your analogy is "I know you are but what am I"? Oh you are truly priceless. I couldn't find someone dumber I'd want to waste time with, except maybe TheDoc or Poed-Poster.
Quote:

So you say you can't find any ESPN analysts using "common opponents" as a reason why the Colts will win ??
I don't recall saying that, I recall saying that nobody uses it as their main argument, which would be pointless.



Quote:

That idiot used it as his NUMBER 2 reason. Why he picked that game is what is retarded. Indy came off of a bye week and had 2 weeks to prepare for the Rams, the Saint didn't and played with several players hurt. The Patriots game is a much much better game to use, but it didn't fit into his bs 15 reason logic of why the colts will win.
Your excuses are hilarious. Like I said, we can use the Bucs game as well.

Quote:

just proves even more my turds know more about football then you. I am off to the french quarter to watch the game and ready to party all night long. Feel free to keep making up excuses and reply here.

Go Saints :thumbsup
Awww so cute. I claim you're making up excuses in the previous posts and what does this half wit do? Tell me the same thing! "I know you are but what am I" indeed. I suspect we won't be seeing this borderline retard after the game, as he will be committing suicide. Then sometime tomorrow, he'll be back to tell us how the refs cheated. ROFL is this kid priceless!

Caligari 02-07-2010 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16822478)
What we did to Warner: RETIRED HIM!

http://media.nola.com/saints_impact/...d265_large.jpg

What we did to Farve: RETIRED HIM!

http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0124...ntsdts_576.jpg


Where you hidding Manning, getting scared yet? Going to knock his teeth out :thumbsup

Found him-
http://www.goryporn.com/images/manningtombstone.jpg

slayer69 02-07-2010 11:21 AM

Going with the saints on this one. Sportsbook has the line at 2.7.

Fire 02-07-2010 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16821773)
This is retarded logic. The Saints also lost their last 3, including a game to the Bucs, while the Colts pretty much rested their starters. The Saints had the better numbers, the Colts had the better record.

Having the better record just might not mean very much. Just ask the Patriots from a couple years ago.

The Demon 02-07-2010 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire (Post 16822723)
Having the better record just might not mean very much. Just ask the Patriots from a couple years ago.

I know. It was a rebuttal to the equally stupid "Well they beat the Pats by more than the Colts did!"

mikeyddddd 02-07-2010 04:18 PM


HandballJim 02-07-2010 07:59 PM

The Who Rocks. :thumbsup

will76 02-07-2010 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16822789)
I know. It was a rebuttal to the equally stupid "Well they beat the Pats by more than the Colts did!"

How u fucking like me now go saints!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'nnnnb nmnb
M!!??!!?!!!!!!!!!!!'nnnnnnbnbbb!!!!!!!!!

Caligari 02-07-2010 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16824670)
How u fucking like me now go saints!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'nnnnb nmnb
M!!??!!?!!!!!!!!!!!'nnnnnnbnbbb!!!!!!!!!

hahaha yep sweet REVENGE

Geaux Saints!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fire 02-07-2010 10:12 PM

I guess The Demon will be trying to get his foot out of his mouth about now.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123