![]() |
|
Quote:
they had to set the bar somewhere and 18 it is.. just like DUI, the limit is .08 and one could argue whats the difference between .08 and .10.. the law is the law... "and he who breaks the law must go to the house of pain"... . |
Quote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ericka Stone <[email protected]> Date: Aug 13, 2007 10:04 AM Subject: female model 4 adult videos & photos Hey there, My name's Ericka Stone. I've done lingerie photo shoots, topless & bikini. Now I need something more exciting & that makes more money. I am 17 but I'm married & emnancipated which is why I could do the other photo shoots. So now I'm looking to do adult videos. So I have attached some pictures. If you'd like to use me in one or a few of your films let me know. Thanks. Ericka Stone -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See what you're getting into?before you go there See it! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. |
think she is brandy in gloryholegirlz.
|
Quote:
|
Oohh please Jennifer.. when you read this
DO NOT RESPOND.... You still have some credit left somewhere :) |
DWB, as you know, there is nothing "different" about a 17 year-old and an 18 year-old. It's just that the law has to draw a line somewhere and that is where they draw it.
What has always killed me about the whole 2257 thing is that no real porn producer would shoot a 17 year-old and risk losing everything, including their freedom. For what? You cannot advertise that they are 17, so what possible reason would there be to shoot an underage girl. But of course, to many people, a porn producer is a drooling pervert who would love nothing better than to get their grubby mitts all over your 17 year-old innocent little snowflake and corrupt her. And we all know that only about half of the content guys are like that. |
Oops!...HE Did It Again......:Oh crap
|
Damn, that's not good.
|
|
sucks to be D now
|
OH wow...
|
Bam! Ouch! :helpme
|
hers the story
http://www.********.com/read.php?ID=31663 |
|
Quote:
If I were a US Attorney fighting the FSC's Motion I would be following this case very closely. |
Quote:
I can't believe he said " "This is not the innocent underaged girl we are talking about," Dirty D told XBIZ. "She apparently used a fake ID. I have no idea why she's making these claim. " She apparantly used a fake ID = admission of guilt. I have no idea why she is making these claims = maybe because she was 17, and a "fake id" doesn't make you 18, even if your fake id says so. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://********.com/read.php?ID=31681 Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And that email address is registered to this MySpace account which says she is now 23 years old. http://www.myspace.com/erickastone |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So will the girl have charges filed on her also, for possessing a fraudulent government ID card? I'm assuming they photocopied it, that should be proof enough, right?
|
Quote:
That is just too fucking funny: Aside from a permanent criminal record, you can be sentenced to pay a cash fine up to $10,000.00, serve an imprisonment sentence up to 15 years, and have your driving privileges revoked up to one year. You can get 15 years in jail, 10,000.00 in fine, but worst of all, you may get your driving privileges revoked for an entire year !! Who will get the plea deal ? the pornographers testifying against someone with a fake id or someone with a fake id testifying against the pornographers? If she is caught (like now) I bet she will say anything to get off the hook |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
PS-
"According to Storm, while the Times article says the shoot in question took place in 2007, it actually took place sometime before October in 2008. Because he is out of the country and away from his 2257 and other records?some of which may have been seized?Storm said he is unsure of the exact date. But he did say the first admission from the performer that she had used a fake ID surfaced in Dec. 2008. Despite immediately removing from his site all images, video and promotional material depicting the performer, Storm told AVN.com that for reasons he still does not understand, the performer?s story recently changed again, resulting in the arrest of his crew." " If Dirty D was a customer of 2257safe.com he could have accessed his records via his laptop and had all of the pertinent information to answer the FEDS and reporters 100% accurately. OH...and he wouldn't have had all of his records taken if they were stored on our servers remotely TISK TISK TISK...... For all of you affiliates and producers who think it can't happen to you- SEE MY SIG! |
Didn't her current bf used to work for Dirty D or for some reason have a grudge with him for some reason? I seem to recall them trying to get him to pull the content down or something of that nature, and recall a website being put up against him.. This all sounds like a revenge plot of some sort.
|
actually 2257 safe is looking better and better......
|
Quote:
:pimp |
Quote:
Instead now, he has to fight to get back the very records that prove his case. Once LE gets a search warrant its all gone. I talked to a producer that had his home raided because of something that someone that was living with was charged with. He wasnt even named in the complaint... The police still took all of his equipment, DV tapes and records because the other guy had access to them. $270,000 worth of stuff and its all still sitting in a police evidence lock-up 8 months later. |
Hope he gets it worked out,fuckin sucks
|
Quote:
Then again...I don't understand half the shit these idiots do and don't do. |
Quote:
Quote:
More than a possibility, he admitted it. . |
Quote:
But this time I believe it. . |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123