Clearly you were talking about the Articles of Confederation, since they predate the Constitution, not about the Constitution Articles. Last time just for you:)
[img]http://img145.imageshack.us/i/owned2my0.png/[img]

#4's PREMISE predated the Constitution, yes.

#4 as it is now is NOT the same as it was pre Constitution.

NO ONE made that claim.

And again, I was speaking literally. Look at a picture of the Consitution. See how they're organized? They're organized by Articles. Very simple concept.

I subscribed to this thread, I've to head out. Ill be back in a few hours and will resume where you reply.

Good point. I don't think weekly knows his head from his ass. Most of his posting on this forum prove that. :2 cents:

Nothing to reply to. You haven't made a single. valid premise, in all of your incoherent rambling. When you get called out with facts, you use misdirection like theDoc, and claim you were talking about someone else. But unlike TheDoc, you don't know when to quit.

There's nothing more I can teach you other than "quit while you're behind". Our "discussion", if you can even call it that, is done. Good day, junior:thumbsup

The Demon, Vendzilla, JaneB and Baddog will love socialized health care when it gets here. They will pay their taxes and be happy.

When it doesn't get here, TheSenator and BFT3K will proceed to commit suicide.

Show me where I claimed I was talking to someone else. I'll be waiting.


Also, show me a valid point you have made that I did not refute. I'll be waiting on this as well.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:thumbsup

Congressional budget scorekeepers say a Medicare fix that Democrats included in earlier versions of their health care bill would push it into the red.

The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that rolling back a programmed cut in Medicare fees to doctors would cost $208 billion over 10 years. If added back to the health care overhaul bill, it would wipe out all the deficit reduction, leaving the legislation $59 billion in the red.

The so-called doc fix was part of the original House bill. Because of its high cost, Democrats decided to pursue it separately. Republicans say the cost should not be ignored. Congress has usually waived the cuts to doctors year by year.

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Medica....html?x=0&.v=2

I actually do. Its funny when losers claim to be in the majority. I find this is the redneck school of life. I can't help your lack of education, that is a problem you will have to solve yourself.

Except you haven't proven to know anything. You just post and hope people don't call you out on your bullshit, kinda like tarheel. That's why you losers are so easy to deal with :)

Your postings are laughable. You are the one that clearly lacks intelligence or education. I love how you try and reverse it.

ATTENTION:

THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENT IS MADE ON BEHALF OF ALL CLEAR-THINKING AMERICANS (all 127 of us):

ALL TEABAGGERS ARE DUMB-ASSES.

Thank you for your attention. Please resume pointless debate with retarded Repulican supporters.

I don't, kid.

Hmm, another dumbass liberal/democrat who contributes absolutely zero to a debate. What a trend.

I'm not sure he "gets it."

Here's a 'contribution to the debate':

I, personally, am for any human being who helps and cares for and assists and aides his/her fellow human being. Many of us do this 'passively' but equally importantly through our taxes. Dumb-ass selfish Republicans have one Motto: Fuck you, I got mine Jack.

I am neither a Conservative or a Liberal but that kind of thinking makes me wonder what Jesus would think of Teabaggers/Republicans. In other words, Republicans just don't seem like very nice people. They seem scared and angry ALL the time, and always point fingers, and find intelligence and choice and freedom to be scary things. They prefer to follow a 'daddy figure' who will tell them what to do and how to feel.

On the other hand, 'liberals' often feel they're the smartest people in the room, and that their well-thought-out 'opinions' are sacrosanct. These 'Liberals' who claim to love the poor would no more hang out with an unwashed delivery boy than eat cheap caviar.

I don't believe in extremes, I believe in 'balance'. Call me a Buddhist, if you will. But here's the Bottom Line to my way of thinking:

Any country that says to it's citizens: "You're sick? You don't have the MONEY to pay to get better? Tough. Die." is a country in decline. Why do we Americans pay TWICE the price the rest of the world does for medicines? The SAME EXACT medications? Why does someone have to make a choice between having a $100,000 operation, mortgaging their home or not having it and dying?

Republicans and Bush supporters and Teabaggers HATE Europeans (apparently) and yet they Europeans longer and better than we do, and are happier and less hateful/spiteful whiny little bitches like so many in our population are.

Oh, a SECOND 'bottom line'! You'll be so thrilled with this one Demon:

BELIEVE WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT TO BELIEVE BUT JUST DON'T TELL ME ABOUT IT.

How's that?

This is the #1 emotional appeal I hear from dumbass liberals. "Republicans are for the rich, we are for the poor and needy." Spare me the bullshit, nobody buys it.

As opposed to liberals who try to justify their own bullshit with "moral relativism."

Fair enough

Except you're really generalizing here..

Very baseless assumptions..
What if I have a feelings diary?

Demon. I hope as you read this a tumor is growing on your spine.

Thanks man! I hope those disability checks of yours are still coming in.

Keep the diary, write IN the diary, PUBLISH the diary, promote the diary all you want - but when someone doesn't want to hear it any longer DROP IT.

Seems simple to me.

Just shows how dumb you are. Even if it is passed it still must be signed by the black jesus before it can become law, so your statement is incorrect.