GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tea Party...Militia?!?! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=963253)

Martin 04-13-2010 12:20 PM

haha Gator you're comical.lol

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17029128)
Oh and dont forget Confederate History Month in Virgina where slavery never existed, lmfao. What a boner that was for that newbie.

Let's also hear from the people that are now calling the confederate soldiers terrorist, they only defended their land, they never marched north.


Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17029166)
and your point is ? Was the " non-liberal " media ( read Fox ..) reporting those deaths | daily " ? Are they now ? or both media no longer reporting it

Coalition Military Fatalities By Year

Year US UK Other Total
2003 486 53 41 580
2004 849 22 35 906
2005 846 23 28 897
2006 822 29 21 872
2007 904 47 10 961
2008 314 4 4 322
2009 149 1 0 150
2010 20 0 0 20
Total 4390 179 139 4708

http://www.icasualties.org/Iraq/Index.aspx


Other question: Is it true that in submarine they lower the oxygen in the air you breathe ? Just wondering ...

What a jack ass, you prove a point by omitting all the facts, like the 96 servicemen that died so far in Afghanistan this year or the 316 that died under Obama last year in Afghanistan. but I guess the service men that died under Obama doesn't matter to you?

Just like you attack my service record for something you wouldn't have the balls to do?

Martin 04-13-2010 12:24 PM

You guys really have no idea do ya. Chances are you know someone who is Militia. You see the pictures on TV with 5-6 hill billies who claim to be Militia but really it's one they started on their own. The real Militias you don't hear from much if at all till its time to act. These guys are ex police/military etc. Also they're main goal wouldn't be to over throw the government. They would want to work towards changing the government first before anything.

theking 04-13-2010 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christopherjon (Post 17029356)
Last time I checked the majority of the Military, both active duty and national guard swing to the right and who do think makes up these militias? It's not your stereotypical "deliverance" rednecks.

I think you'll find many retired and active military personnel involved in the local militia movements as well as local law enforcement. Many may not be "out of the closet" due to it being bad for their careers but that doesn't mean they aren't involved or don't have family who are.

I'm not saying anything stupid is ever going to happen but if it did you might find that the people with the big guns aren't necessarily on the side you think they are. It's not liberals who are joining the military or law enforcement.

The primary reason the military is "right" oriented is because Republicans...are generally bigger on defense spending and defense R&D then Democrats are. You will find former military involved in all walks of life...so yes their are some that are in the militia.

mayabong 04-13-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17029362)
haha Gator you're comical.lol

I'll post this one more time since I think its important. I'd love some feedback on what this Marine Veteran, and director of studies at the US Army War College says. These people are catching on to the lies and he also says how unlike the political end of things, the military hasn't been bought. Things might get interesting. This was a couple weeks ago, not televised of course. Weather you agree with what he says or not, people in the high levels are actually talking about this stuff. :)


Joshua G 04-13-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17029332)
Still doesn't answer the question of the purpose of the militia. It's amazing that the pro-militia people still have yet to answer that basic question. Why do you fail to answer the question?

all you have to do is read the article...The militia's purpose would be to "defend" against what activists see as improper federal infringements on state sovereignty. Im sure you think this is BS. in some cases, if they go the way of the Klan, they might actually threaten or attack someone. But liberales should not assume people who play with guns automatically want to attack something. Self defense is the basis of our lax gun laws.

J. Falcon 04-13-2010 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17029362)
haha Gator you're comical.lol

And you are clearly deliusional.

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17029374)
You guys really have no idea do ya. Chances are you know someone who is Militia. You see the pictures on TV with 5-6 hill billies who claim to be Militia but really it's one they started on their own. The real Militias you don't hear from much if at all till its time to act. These guys are ex police/military etc. Also they're main goal wouldn't be to over throw the government. They would want to work towards changing the government first before anything.

Yeah, I agree with you, only the crazies want anarchy, most are more like a gun club that are activist and protest peacefully

GatorB 04-13-2010 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 17029384)
all you have to do is read the article...The militia's purpose would be to "defend" against what activists see as improper federal infringements on state sovereignty.

Yeah and how do they intend on "defending" state sovereignty?

Martin 04-13-2010 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 17029385)
And you are clearly deliusional.

You guys are the delusional ones. I believe the American Constitution is perfectly fine document.:thumbsup

Oh yeah, I forgot. That makes me a terrorist these days.

Joshua G 04-13-2010 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17029352)
Let's say these militias could overthrow the government. Does anyone here actually want them in charge? Oh and by the way pro-militia nuts, during the time in country is in total chaos because of you, our enemies are getting ready to attack because they see that we are in a weakened state. So good luck when you take over. Good luck running the show. Good luck setting a budget, allocating funds, fixing bridges and roads etc., providing basic necessities to the 300 million Americans you just "freed" form tyranny.

i will say this in defense of militias...should it come to pass that nuclear weapons explode over DC & wall street, leading to a state of haiti-like civilian unrest as people can no longer access cash to live on, it will be militias that grow & either maintain order, or behave like roving mauraders looting stores & houses. In such a scenario, i would most definitely want to be in a militia.

GatorB 04-13-2010 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17029397)
You guys are the delusional ones. I believe the American Constitution is perfectly fine document.:thumbsup

Oh yeah, I forgot. That makes me a terrorist these days.

So do I. Especially the part about free elections and free speech. I'm not sure where the "overthrow the legitimately elected government" and "Kill all those that disagree with you" part is in it.

Joshua G 04-13-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17029393)
Yeah and how do they intend on "defending" state sovereignty?

haha...thats the magic question...the imaginary liberal army that comes to their state to impose their taxes & health care programs!

sperbonzo 04-13-2010 12:36 PM

I don't understand what the leftwingers on this thread are so upset about.... You guys have had majorities since 2006, you have bigger majorities now, and the executive branch also.... Just relax and enjoy your power... Why all the anger?



.

GatorB 04-13-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 17029401)
i will say this in defense of militias...should it come to pass that nuclear weapons explode over DC & wall street, leading to a state of haiti-like civilian unrest as people can no longer access cash to live on, it will be militias that grow & either maintain order, or behave like roving mauraders looting stores & houses. In such a scenario, i would most definitely want to be in a militia.

But the thing is it would be the militias fault DC is in ashes to begin with. So why defend people that attack their own country? You either love America or you don't. You either are a patriot or you're Timothy McVeigh.

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 17029401)
i will say this in defense of militias...should it come to pass that nuclear weapons explode over DC & wall street, leading to a state of haiti-like civilian unrest as people can no longer access cash to live on, it will be militias that grow & either maintain order, or behave like roving mauraders looting stores & houses. In such a scenario, i would most definitely want to be in a militia.

Someone asked me once if I had a survival kit of some sorts if a major event happened, I showed them my AR-15 and a box of ammo

theking 04-13-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin (Post 17029397)
You guys are the delusional ones. I believe the American Constitution is perfectly fine document.:thumbsup

Oh yeah, I forgot. That makes me a terrorist these days.

The Constitution is alive and well. It is the Supreme Court that defines and defends what laws are constitutional and what laws are not. Any law enacted by local, state or the federal government can be and often is challenged in the courts and many end up in the Supreme Court. No other government entity and certainly no individual...other than the Supreme Court...has this right or this responsibility. While I sometimes disagree with Supreme Court decisions...I...being a law abiding citizen am obligated to abide by their decisions...that is our system of government.

dig420 04-13-2010 12:43 PM

yep, they're patriots all right. Great americans!

CosmicTang 04-13-2010 12:45 PM

There's no way to accurately predict what would happen in a Constitutional crisis where the country came to the brink of revolt. Maybe the armed forces would fire on their own people, maybe they wouldn't. In 1989 in Tianenmen Square the Chinese military turned on its own people. Two years later in Red Square the Russian military sided with the people and refused to carry out a coup effectively finishing off communist rule and facilitating the demise of the Soviet Union. In both cases the citizenry was unarmed.

I don't know what would happen here. The militias might cave in the face of better trained, better armed military and police forces. Or perhaps seeing the dissenters as plain folk like their families the kids in the military might refuse to fire.

What I do know is that the fact this is starting to happen should give the government pause to think about what its doing to piss off so many people. The militia folks are not without their relevant talking points.

As to the person who suggested we vote and use free speech...you haven't been paying attention. The government is doing what it damn well wants regardless of what the people who pay the bills are screaming for. The people roundly said no to the bailouts and they were granted behind closed doors. They voiced their opinions on health care, and yet again were largely ignored. And the final insult may have been the Supreme Court granting corporations--possibly including foreign ones--the right to spend as much money as they want in campaigns which would determine elections of our representatives. I think it's plain they don't have the people in mind.

So the question becomes: when is it enough?

Clearly the government isn't working for the people anymore and the Constitution is an afterthought to seemingly everyone in D.C. At what point do people have not merely the right, but the responsibility to do something about it?

I would hate to see the situation come to violence but should these bullies and their corrupt and unjust system be allowed to continue while hiding behind the guise of democracy?

Honestly, when is it enough?

Martin 04-13-2010 12:50 PM

Well said Cosmic.

whitey 04-13-2010 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyluver (Post 17028583)
Are you saying that the time has come to enforce rights through some sort of civil disobedience or the organization of militias (besides OK)? Careful, your answer could earn you a spot on the "no fly" list.

Another right Americans enjoy is the vote. The vote might just be stronger that bullets and militias. Another right is speech. Many politicians don't seem to be listening to the majority and may find themselves out of a job.

The second Amendment was not constructed to protect the tyranny of the masses by the few, but, rather, the tryanny of the few by the masses. In the latter case, the vote only exacerbates the problem in an environment where demagougic politicians use demonization freely.

theking 04-13-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicTang (Post 17029440)

As to the person who suggested we vote and use free speech...you haven't been paying attention. The government is doing what it damn well wants regardless of what the people who pay the bills are screaming for. The people roundly said no to the bailouts and they were granted behind closed doors. They voiced their opinions on health care, and yet again were largely ignored. And the final insult may have been the Supreme Court granting corporations--possibly including foreign ones--the right to spend as much money as they want in campaigns which would determine elections of our representatives. I think it's plain they don't have the people in mind.

So the question becomes: when is it enough?

Our system is not a Democracy. We are a Republic and out system is that of a Representative Democracy. We elect people to represent us and it is not their job or their duty to represent us by "polls". Every two years members of the House are up for re-election...every six years members of the Senate are up for re-election and every four years the Presidency is up for re-election. If the people do not like the way their Congressman...or Senator...or President represented them the people will not re-elect them. Elections are the time and way for the peoples voices to be heard...loud and clear. That is our system of government.

tony286 04-13-2010 01:03 PM

When it was muskets against muskets that worked. People talk about how great the army is but they really have no idea the power they can yield at a target. The funny thing is I can sit and talk about all the real things I think obama and the politicians I are doing fucked up all day long and Im a lefty. I don't understand why the right and the tea party has to make up shit. They are protesting apr 15 when 47 percent of this country pays nothing in taxes. They are being played its really sad.

Joshua G 04-13-2010 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17029413)
But the thing is it would be the militias fault DC is in ashes to begin with. So why defend people that attack their own country? You either love America or you don't. You either are a patriot or you're Timothy McVeigh.

I agree the rhetoric of the right wing has gone batshit insane. Its extremely toxic, this idea that disagreeing parties are unamerican. Such words are a road to fascism.

Just my opinion here. but liberalism: the concepts of tolerence, combatting poverty & racism, the pursuit of education - these are things that prosper in an environment of peace & freedom. In places that are chronically unstable, like africa & the middle east, anti-intellectualism, xenophobia, & rascism still reign. By extension, the american right wing mimics these more primative values & prospers in a climate of fear & instability. This is why the right wing is obsessed with demonizing the government.

Tom_PM 04-13-2010 01:10 PM

I personally do not believe for one second that a majority of american people did not want healthcare reform. Thats just laughable to me. President Obama ran on several platforms, one of the most important being health care reform. He won the election. ie: the majority of american voters WANTED healthcare reform when it really mattered. It's just a negative talking point now for when people want to roll out poll results favorable to their own position.

CosmicTang 04-13-2010 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17029487)
Our system is not a Democracy. We are a Republic and out system is that of a Representative Democracy. We elect people to represent us and it is not their job or their duty to represent us by "polls". Every two years members of the House are up for re-election...every six years members of the Senate are up for re-election and every four years the Presidency is up for re-election. If the people do not like the way their Congressman...or Senator...or President represented them the people will not re-elect them. Elections are the time and way for the peoples voices to be heard...loud and clear. That is our system of government.

Our system is a republican form of democracy and even though we send representatives to the capital they are, in fact, beholden to us. Their job is to represent us, not give us lip service. That's why Congress keeps offices in D.C. and in their districts back home. So they can keep the pulse of the people and listen to what they want. Do you think Congress giving Wall St. those bailouts despite the people being opposed served us? Are you okay with writing off the $1 trillion + and resigning yourself to voting against your representative?

And the part about being able to vote them out of office if they displease us? Well I just laid it out for you. The SCOTUS just handed corporate America, and possibly foreign ones as well, the ability to elect your next representatives. Good luck getting what you need and what Corporate America needs in alignment.


This country came about as a direct result of taxation without representation. More and more Congress is representing not the people, but the special interests and, coming soon, multinational corporations who line their pockets and foot the bill for their campaigns. Your tax dollars, trillions of dollars worth, are going to fight wars against people who've done nothing to you to secure resources and subsidize corporations you don't own for the purpose of private profit. Our republic is becoming a plutocracy. In fact, I'd say it's already there.

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 17029506)
You know I read this and just shook my head. Tea party members have been proven to mostly be republicans not all, but most and the sorest losers on the planet. They lost the health-care fight so move on? No. Now 17 states (all republican) are starting lawsuits against federal government knowing full well they won't win but their reasoning is for some sort of legal protest!

This is one of many reasons why i'd never adopt their politics because they wanted to shoot down health-care due to costs but have no problem spending millions of dollars (they can't afford) tying up the court system with frivolous lawsuits just to make a point, knowing full well it's now THE LAW.

The problem is the Tea Party and it's members are nothing but tools because they are so easily lead on bullshit stuff. You do realize in 2008 both Dems/Republicans citizens flooded Congress/Senate with calls of protest on the bank funding bail-out.

They still passed the funding bail-out bill against the majority of the people. In short, the US just had it first financial coup d'état ...and you are worrying about what some black politicians said?

TOOL

Well, I consider the tea party full of conservatives, their party has really nothing to do with it, even the GOP knows that.
People have a problem with changing the health care system and having the government take it over, I mean they are doing such a good job with the Social Security, Border Security, Medicaid and the list goes on, so they are going to fight it in court. Although the government has violated the 10th amendment a bunch of times in the past, making people buy insurance is a joke. I'll bet that Blue Cross raised the cost of their insurance just to scare people into passing the health reform, I mean, who wouldn't want 30 million more government subsidized customers.
If you think more people want the over haul, well we'll see in a few months after the elections, Bart Stupak doesn't have the stomach to try to get re-elected and Harry Reid is trailing behind all 3 GOP runners. I read where Harry Reid got a government paid for Bridge put on his property? Things are fucked up!

kane 04-13-2010 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicTang (Post 17029440)
There's no way to accurately predict what would happen in a Constitutional crisis where the country came to the brink of revolt. Maybe the armed forces would fire on their own people, maybe they wouldn't. In 1989 in Tianenmen Square the Chinese military turned on its own people. Two years later in Red Square the Russian military sided with the people and refused to carry out a coup effectively finishing off communist rule and facilitating the demise of the Soviet Union. In both cases the citizenry was unarmed.

I don't know what would happen here. The militias might cave in the face of better trained, better armed military and police forces. Or perhaps seeing the dissenters as plain folk like their families the kids in the military might refuse to fire.

Well said.

Quote:

What I do know is that the fact this is starting to happen should give the government pause to think about what its doing to piss off so many people. The militia folks are not without their relevant talking points.

As to the person who suggested we vote and use free speech...you haven't been paying attention. The government is doing what it damn well wants regardless of what the people who pay the bills are screaming for. The people roundly said no to the bailouts and they were granted behind closed doors. They voiced their opinions on health care, and yet again were largely ignored. And the final insult may have been the Supreme Court granting corporations--possibly including foreign ones--the right to spend as much money as they want in campaigns which would determine elections of our representatives. I think it's plain they don't have the people in mind.

Let me play a little devils advocate.

Obama got 53% of the vote or 69million votes. There are around 200 million eligible voters in this country and about 300 million total people. That means only about 34% of the eligible votes and 23% of the population voted for him. He ran on a platform of raising taxes, bailing out companies and creating national healthcare. Today his approval rating hovers around 47-49% depending on the day. So you could argue that aside from the supreme court thing, which he has no part in and was a terrible ruling that sold out the American people, he has delivered what he said he was going to and many of his strongest supporters still support him and his action. He really only cares about them and they are getting what they wanted.

Much of this unrest is simply the right trying to regain their footing. The republican party is a dying animal. In the next 15 years we will see an increase in the black and latino populations (actually it is all ethnic minorities but mostly blacks and latinos) of 300% while the white population will stay about the same. These are groups that tend to vote democrat. Add in the fact that they are losing a grip on the religious right and it makes for a very dim outlook for them 10-15 years from now. They are working hard to build a new base and the tea party is that base. They are switching to the angry white person base and right at the moment it is working. But just because there is a vocal group out there doesn't mean everyone in the country feels that way.

Voting can change it. There is no need for an overthrow. If everyone eligible to vote that was angry at the government voted against those that they don't like, we would have new leadership. No shooting, no uprising, just votes.

Quote:

So the question becomes: when is it enough?

Clearly the government isn't working for the people anymore and the Constitution is an afterthought to seemingly everyone in D.C. At what point do people have not merely the right, but the responsibility to do something about it?

I would hate to see the situation come to violence but should these bullies and their corrupt and unjust system be allowed to continue while hiding behind the guise of democracy?

Honestly, when is it enough?
To me the question is who should the government be listening to? If a person didn't bother voting, but is against a bailout or a health care bill, should the leaders listen to them? The answer is that they probably should, but they don't because they don't have to because that person isn't going to vote during the election anyway, so they have no fear of that person. If everyone who complained and is angry would actually vote we would potentially have more viable leaders and a third or even fourth party. But as it is about 30% of the population controls the rest of the population.

If you truly want your government to fear you, put the guns down and go to the voting booth on election day. As it is right now the Tea Party thinks they are being revolutionaries and in November they are going to vote republican and many of those people will be no better than the democrats that are there now.

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17029512)
I personally do not believe for one second that a majority of american people did not want healthcare reform. Thats just laughable to me. President Obama ran on several platforms, one of the most important being health care reform. He won the election. ie: the majority of american voters WANTED healthcare reform when it really mattered. It's just a negative talking point now for when people want to roll out poll results favorable to their own position.

Keep your rose colored glasses on

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 31% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential

The Tea Party movement is growing. Twenty-four percent (24%) of voters nationwide now consider themselves part of that movement, up from 16% a month ago. Support for repeal of the new health care law is also growing

Yes these are poll results, go ahead, find a reputable unbiased pollster that thinks Obama has better numbers

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 17029549)
Well said.




Let me play a little devils advocate.

Obama got 53% of the vote or 69million votes. There are around 200 million eligible voters in this country and about 300 million total people. That means only about 34% of the eligible votes and 23% of the population voted for him. He ran on a platform of raising taxes, bailing out companies and creating national healthcare. Today his approval rating hovers around 47-49% depending on the day. So you could argue that aside from the supreme court thing, which he has no part in and was a terrible ruling that sold out the American people, he has delivered what he said he was going to and many of his strongest supporters still support him and his action. He really only cares about them and they are getting what they wanted.

Much of this unrest is simply the right trying to regain their footing. The republican party is a dying animal. In the next 15 years we will see an increase in the black and latino populations (actually it is all ethnic minorities but mostly blacks and latinos) of 300% while the white population will stay about the same. These are groups that tend to vote democrat. Add in the fact that they are losing a grip on the religious right and it makes for a very dim outlook for them 10-15 years from now. They are working hard to build a new base and the tea party is that base. They are switching to the angry white person base and right at the moment it is working. But just because there is a vocal group out there doesn't mean everyone in the country feels that way.

Voting can change it. There is no need for an overthrow. If everyone eligible to vote that was angry at the government voted against those that they don't like, we would have new leadership. No shooting, no uprising, just votes.



To me the question is who should the government be listening to? If a person didn't bother voting, but is against a bailout or a health care bill, should the leaders listen to them? The answer is that they probably should, but they don't because they don't have to because that person isn't going to vote during the election anyway, so they have no fear of that person. If everyone who complained and is angry would actually vote we would potentially have more viable leaders and a third or even fourth party. But as it is about 30% of the population controls the rest of the population.

If you truly want your government to fear you, put the guns down and go to the voting booth on election day. As it is right now the Tea Party thinks they are being revolutionaries and in November they are going to vote republican and many of those people will be no better than the democrats that are there now.

the truth is Obama got in office, because he wasn't Hillary and he wasn't Bush

Tom_PM 04-13-2010 01:28 PM

I'm all for a mandatory voting act. There's no reason we shouldnt be able to register our vote from home in some fashion. Screw this notion that bad weather could tip an election. Weather!

PenisFace 04-13-2010 01:29 PM

Why are american's so terified of their own government? I'll never understand that. The level of paranoia down there is immense.

Tom_PM 04-13-2010 01:30 PM

Vendzilla, thats just proving my point. It's a poll; the election is over. Polls will come and polls will go and for a few more years, Obama will be our president. Which is more important?

VikingMan 04-13-2010 01:30 PM

Obama, Bush, Clinton, Ron Paul all have the same masters :2 cents: The 2 party system is just an illusion.

Vendzilla 04-13-2010 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 17029489)
When it was muskets against muskets that worked. People talk about how great the army is but they really have no idea the power they can yield at a target. The funny thing is I can sit and talk about all the real things I think obama and the politicians I are doing fucked up all day long and Im a lefty. I don't understand why the right and the tea party has to make up shit. They are protesting apr 15 when 47 percent of this country pays nothing in taxes. They are being played its really sad.

Yet the left say the right only cuts taxes for the rich

theking 04-13-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CosmicTang (Post 17029533)
Our system is a republican form of democracy and even though we send representatives to the capital they are, in fact, beholden to us. Their job is to represent us, not give us lip service. That's why Congress keeps offices in D.C. and in their districts back home. So they can keep the pulse of the people and listen to what they want. Do you think Congress giving Wall St. those bailouts despite the people being opposed served us? Are you okay with writing off the $1 trillion + and resigning yourself to voting against your representative?

And the part about being able to vote them out of office if they displease us? Well I just laid it out for you. The SCOTUS just handed corporate America, and possibly foreign ones as well, the ability to elect your next representatives. Good luck getting what you need and what Corporate America needs in alignment.


This country came about as a direct result of taxation without representation. More and more Congress is representing not the people, but the special interests and, coming soon, multinational corporations who line their pockets and foot the bill for their campaigns. Your tax dollars, trillions of dollars worth, are going to fight wars against people who've done nothing to you to secure resources and subsidize corporations you don't own for the purpose of private profit. Our republic is becoming a plutocracy. In fact, I'd say it's already there.

If the people do not like their system of government then the people can change that system of government by creating a viable third party and replacing the incumbents with those of the third party. There are many third parties already in existence and have nominees that run for office but up to this point in time there are not any viable third parties (and if you look at some of their platforms and those they nominate you can understand why). The power lies with the people...but the majority of the people do not exercise their power...so the blame lies with the people.

PenisFace 04-13-2010 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17029596)
If the people do not like their system of government then the people can change that system of government by creating a viable third party and replacing the incumbents with those of the third party. There are many third parties already in existence and have nominees that run for office but up to this point in time there are not any viable third parties (and if you look at some of their platforms and those they nominate you can understand why). The power lies with the people...but the majority of the people do not exercise their power...so the blame lies with the people.

Goddam i didn't think I would ever agree with you. It's a two party system because people are too lazy/inept to make it anything other than that.

tony286 04-13-2010 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17029588)
Yet the left say the right only cuts taxes for the rich

They do for the most part lets not kid our selves.A big chunk of that no tax people is people with kids that get tax credits and people not working. right or left understand this they dont give a fuck about you and me. On both sides and this includes the tea party they tell you what you want to hear.They care about big donations that is all. I learned that after all this bullshit. You think I wouldve learned it sooner. lol

BFT3K 04-13-2010 01:40 PM

Here's the good news...

Obama/Biden defeated McCain/Palin

If you think we are in trouble now, with a balanced, thoughtful, intelligent, and well tempered leader at the helm, just imagine where we would be should the election have ended differently.

The anti-GOP movement that would be going on right now would make the current tea party movement look like..... well, a tea party!

kane 04-13-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17029572)
the truth is Obama got in office, because he wasn't Hillary and he wasn't Bush

That wasn't the point. The point is that people are making it out like the entire country is up in arms about what the democrats are doing. I was simply pointing out that those who voted for Obama are getting what he promised them and are happy. Most of the country isn't up in arms. The republican base and some conservatives are.

I don't support everything Obama has done and I am among those who feel that everyone in congress needs to be thrown out and replaced, but I am not blind to the reality that the Tea Party is simply just the republican party with a different name and they will elect the same people who helped to cause the problems we have now.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc