Okay, but besides all this, you don't really think the government or THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION at the time sat down and worked something out so the buildings could be bombed, right?

Read the FOURTH K? Great book!

A question for you would be who was in charge for the security in the WTC before 9/11? I'll just ask the questions and let you research.

this makes no sense as a reply to my comment. the fact is there is an official conspiracy version of 9/11, i summarized it briefly, the details are inconsequential in regards to the overall version.

the other parts of your comment do not go towards the topic in the slightest.

Of course you'll let me research cause your fucking lazy and you're spitting all all this ludicrous conspiracy bullshit.

Do you believe in the JFK Conspiracy, Lincoln Conspiracy, the Illuminati, Roswild, etc.

To be fair, you're quite paranoid. You've proven this in prior posts :thumbsup

AND THINK ABOUT THIS, right?

The fact is that there's an "official" conspiracy version? Isn't that an oxymoron? What office is putting their stamp on it? The US Dept. of Conspiracies?

Conspiracy theories are decidedly UNofficial. That's why they're called conspiracy theories instead of official reports.

Too many unanswered questions to complete an investigation ... end of story.

i can tell you..but for you to believe it you should look yourself

it was one of the bush brothers...his company took control of it 6 months before

i don't know what it means, but its just another piece of pie that doesn't taste right

oh come on, no need to go spelling nazi over semantics when the fact is that the conpiracy theory revolves around the u.s. gov attacking it's own soil under a false flag op to go to war in iraq to secure oil revenues.


you can try and divert to focus to me all you want, that's cool, but fyi, you look silly when you try and make this about my use of the word official.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories

I think he only has one brother, but I might be wrong.

Actually I feel bad for W. now ever since I saw the Oliver Stone movie LOL. :1orglaugh

But, I'm still a democrat!

George W. Bush is one of four sons and two daughters.

Exactly! But this is the part I don't believe ever happens. It makes for good movies and tv series like Jericho, but there is never any real clandestine conspiracy. There is too much money at stake to let any real revolt get out of control, even in the abstract sense.

No shit? That's what i get for watching Oliver Stone again :1orglaugh

I should have at least checked wikipedia before posting, huh?

I see. I look silly because I actually use a word properly (It's not a typo dude, it changes the entire meaning of what you wrote). Got it. That is one of the ills of our society: lazy intellect.

I don't think it's unreasonable to think that a government would hurt the people its charged to protect to pursue government's inevitable goal: the consolidation of more and more power over the people it's supposed to serve. It's as predictable as a moth to a flame.

Governments all over the world and throughout history have done this. Our country has even helped many of them. Why do you think our government wouldn't do something like that to our own? Because we're Americans? Is American DNA different from any other human DNA?

Well said, you should write books

I look silly when I point out an incorrect usage of language that completely changes the meaning of a statement and I look crazy when I point out a theory that is in stark contrast to the one neatly packaged and marketed by those who stand to benefit most from its acceptance.

It's not really THAT hard to draw a line between two points, is it?

Was it our government attacking our own for twenty years or more...including the first attack on the World Trade Center and all of the different "terrorist" orgs just volunteered to take credit for the attacks?

the fact that a poster named *cosmic tang* actually feels the need to analyze me, concluding i have a *lazy intellect* all based on the use of one word at a message board named gofuckyourself is of absolutely no consequence to me, but by all means, do go on

obviously, you waxed over my earlier post stating i do not believe the official government version but that comment by me is not conducive to you making this about me.

no need for the history lesson either.

I'm not analyzing you. I have no idea who you are to be honest. I certainly am not judging you. I am judging your post. That sort of thing is symptomatic of what we've become, an intellectually lazy society. Whether you are or not I have no idea. My apologies if you feel I was making it personal.

I don't care what the board is or where, there's no reason to be uncivil or stupid when it can be avoided. But hey, that's just me.

you concluding i am intellectually lazy for referring to the 9/11 conspiracy theory as *official* in an inconsequential thread here is a judgement, certainly a wordsmith of your caliber would know that.

i've yet to be uncivil or stupid in this thread but, please, continue to make this about me.

This. Both "stories" are pretty far fetched.

?If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.?

-Joseph Goebbels famous Nazi

No, you haven't as far as I can see. Didn't claim that you were. If you're more comfortable with me judging you I can oblige.

And a simple, easy, cost-effective way to repress dissent is to label the dissenters as conspiracy nuts.

i'm here to waste time and have nothing to prove. you are also free to enjoy yourself here as you please.


threads such as these crack me up and i enjoy killing time on them knowing full well they go no where and accomplish nothing.

On this we agree.

If 1 person decides to research the offical 9/11 claims on their own cause of questions posed in this thread, then I think its worth it. No matter what their final decision on the attacks is.

you gotta see this 911 Clues, Fake Media Mind Control pt 1/9

What if that person was just about to discover the cure for Cancer, but before they could get there, diverted all their resources to this?

This the only comeback you have? I really don't know the answer to that question.

More nutjobs.

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth



Richard Gage of Arch's and Engineers for 9/11 Truth



How you can label these people "crazy" nutjobs for asking questions is beyond me.

Okay so what if one single legitimate person could do one legitimate thing if not for this distraction then? I understand Cancer is very minute and and insignificant and this conspiracy is so fucking huge and important and probably true!

For one I don't think this is a distraction from anything. This is THE reason that america is killing innocent people around the world. As long as people think that a bunch of arabs directed from a guy in a cave they can continue to do what they do. As far as cancer, there are cures, I personally know someone who cured himself with bloodroot. There is way too much money in people getting treated for cancer than there ever will be in a cure. This is why you'll never see a cure as long as our "health" system stays like it is.

Okay, I understand now. There's a cure for Cancer and 9/11 was a conspiracy by the government for reasons yet to be determined. We're cool. It would really be tough for me to discuss this any further without Bigfoot backing me up.

Anyone who thinks the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition, know nothing about controlled demolition.

You really have to feel for the simpleton democrats.. 9 years and they couldn't provide one single shred of evidence to implicate the previous administration.

sure, that's cool. ftr, the only conspiracy theory i take real issue with is the one claiming lunar landings were faked.

Short statement and pretty much says it all.

Try debating some of the topics that Eric Lawyer and Richard Gage bring up instead of attacking me. This is common especially on the main news stations especially when its hard to debate the topics they bring up.
Here is the guy from "NIST" denying molten metal under the towers. Are these the people you put your faith in for your facts?



As far as cancer, I'm not gonna debate that right now.

err, bomb sniffer dogs had been put outta duty for weeks and there was some kinda "construction" work going on in both buildings while security wasnt that tight ... um, and dont forget the millions of bucks silverstein made with his anti-terror insurance ... oh, and looking at the security company for the towers --- wasnt there a cousin of GWB or such responsible for the security at that time? the whole story smells fishy to me :helpme