|
Quote:
|
I think we should plan a conspiracy right here and now just to see if we can pull one off. Like farting in some celebrity's grab bag or something.
|
Quote:
|
YouTube search ' WTC FLASHES
do you see the FLASHES well thats controlled demolition |
Quote:
|
i dunno
whats the official version this week? |
Quote:
It doesn't take anyone with more than layman's knowledge of CD to see the magnitude of the task of rigging the WTC to come down, and realize its not only improbable, but impossible. Even assuming the insurmountable logistical hurdles could be overcome, there's also the job of keeping the evil demolition experts quiet after they had killed innocent Americans. You guys that even entertain the idea are just fucking silly, and don't even stop to think for second how it could even be possible. The funniest thing is, you act like the burden of proof is on the people who believe the official story, who basically have common sense, and Occam's Razor on their side. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
there's been some very sophisticated non-gov computer modelings of the collapses and they support the fact that the planes crashing into the building and the consequential damage caused those bldgs to fall the way they did.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Proof..that is the operative word. |
inside job aka conspiracy aka False Flag aka Operation Northwoods
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Memorandum.jpg |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Exactly...just one of the building is 3 times the size of the biggest job ever done. This is what seems to be going over the heads of those who subscribe to the demolition theory. There's never any explanation as to how crews of engineers could get a job of this magnitude done in one of the busiest sites in NYC. It's not like some commandos could get it done by just sneaking in and throwing a few timed bombs behind some desks while office workers are at the water cooler. The only things they have is .."well, the WTC was shut down and there were these mysterious trucks and stuff"...and that never even happened. CD involves lots of drilling with large equipment, miles of wiring and unfettered access to the building. The WTC site is decidedly "fettered". Its fettered as a motherfucker. Not. Possible. Case closed. |
Quote:
however i think you are unaware of some facts. important to note i said facts....you look them up, i went over this years ago when no one cared fact 1...large portions of the towers were put under security control, by the people running security at the building....even the head maintenance worker who could in all sense say they were his buildings....he was not allowed in these areas...meanwhile work was going on, heavy work as reported by staff when they would see the comings and goings of material and the people themselves doing the work fact 2...for months and months before the event, office workers in the building were complaining about dust on their monitors every morning. fact 3...wires were laid all over the building, to upgrade the networks that in itself doesn't amount to much i know. however, in light of the magnitude of the event in question, you really need to look at things that stand out like this...its not proof of anything really...but when added to the pile of things that dont add up that day...it certainly is noteworthy |
there are many flaws in the the controlled demo theory.
1. timing. why was there such a delay between the planes impacting and the collapse? not to mention the actual plan: let's fly a plane into a building, we know it won't make the building fall so we will load the bldg with tons of explosives and then wait a while after impact to blw the bldgs. 2. so the 3 bldgs were wired to blow but the decision to blow bldg 7 was not made until after all the shit hit the fan and even then, the decision was made by silverstein. 3. a complete lack of any explosive debris after. 4. 30,000 employees work in those 3 bldgs and not 1 of them noticed anything out of the ordinary while the bldgs were being wired. 5. nano-thermite, it burns, it does not explode. the amount required to collapse those bldgs is more than there is available at any one time on the planet. |
................................
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
BBC reporting on building 7's collapse while it's still standing in the shot right behind them was a little strange.
|
Quote:
Scare a herd of sheep from multiple directions and they all cram up close together and move as one big group. Do it to your population and you have the freedom to do whatever you want to them with their blessing. Not that I am saying the US government was involved in the attacks, but they certainly took advantage of the resulting chaos and fear. |
Voted...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What was that You Tube video with all the witnesses to contradict 9/11 stories ending up mysteriously dead?
Any verified truth to it? |
There have been many conspiracy theories. In the real world(hint: not the computer), the conspiracy nuts get ridiculed because, well, they have no logical arguments to back up their nonsense. On the internet, it's the conspiracy nuts ridiculing OTHERS and accusing them to be sheeple because they're insecure enough to branch out on their own and pray people think they're intelligent enough because they think differently. Kinda ironic.
While I don't think anyone truly believes the government version 100%, over 2,000 people died that day. Perhaps we could stop spitting on their ashes with these retarded theories. Nobody thinks you're more intelligent just because you believe it was a "conspiracy", or an "inside job", so just drop it. |
i dont believe in everything
|
Quote:
Yes, it actually would be much easier. All you would have had to do is to transport a small amount of fissionable materials, not an issue really. . |
Quote:
|
nope ...
|
|
Just watch the documentary on called The New American Century. Thats all I gotta say about this. :)
|
Problem
Reaction Solution |
Quote:
they won't be a part of the NWO going forward due to this egregious slip. |
Quote:
|
Here's a good question. If the government had to prove their official story beyond a reasonable doubt like any prosecutor would have to, could reasonable doubt be raised?
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc