When they work out how to make a polarized effect without using glasses, 3D porn will be where it's at.

i want holoporn....preferably a holodeck.

I don't remember if my eyes hurt but I kind of remember my date saying
her eyes hurt. And yeah, I kept wondering when I was going to see the 3D.

Human vision varies from person to person so maybe some people can't even
see the 3D. I didn't for sure.

Pretty much everyone on this site I bet? It's not like your gonna be embarassed someone might see you wearing some stupid glasses.

The problem is about premature ejaculation. Noone can last longer then 5 minutes. Thats why tubes took over those silly forever-fuck movies.

If anyone is interested in buying some 3D related domains → http://www.gfy.com/sell-and-buy-forum/963991-hot-3d-domains-sale.html

Simple.. do 3D Paysites convert a lot better than regular paysites?

Con someone answer this question, without spamming something or having a 3D ref code sponsor in their sig?

.

it's part of the future

It's very easy to predict..

http://www.google.com/trends?q=3d+tv...ate=all&sort=0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_television

Along with the increasing number of 3D displays owners there will me increasing demand for 3D porn.

It's as simple as that. There is not much real 3D paysites right now. Time for acting? The volcano is about to explode but haters will always dispute. :D

I don't think so and would not waste a nickle on 3D domains. :2 cents:

3d is not expensive if you do not want it to be.

i have seen one firm doing a 3d webcan for £40.

I am sort of debating now over the idea of holographic porn. Again...it will take a new piece of equipment in EVERYONES home...but this particular piece of equipment could be used for the every day viewing in the home of TV programs and such...so I might think that this would be the best Idea to attack. I also heard that you can take ANY digital image and produce it holographically with the right holographic projector....so that might be the ticket. It would just need software editing.

This was posted by someone a few weeks ago here on GFY. Simple solution for 3D video selfshot style: http://www.minoru3d.com/

3D TV without glasses are supposedly pretty good but not up to mass production quality.

They project 9? different images at different angles so each eye gets a different image.

It will take off for sure, but there will always be a place for 2D, media will be 70% 3D and 30% 2D

I did write 50/50 but I just channeled "more than 50", "imagine the possibilities", "will gain more and more market share every year". So there you go! Quotes were taken from RicksBlog about the iPad.

If you now anything about how REAL 3-D works then it's impossible to do without glasses.

So I would say that 3D is still something that everyone is still thinking about but no one is doing really yet...right?

To answer your question, no.

3D was "the future", 50 years ago. Now it's just a gimmick.

DXG has a consumer level true 3D camcorder coming out this summer for $600. It says the content can be played on the new 3D tvs that are out (using glasses). The view screen built into the camera is stereoscopic so you can view what you shot - in 3D - w/o glasses.

PC Mag article on it: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2362650,00.asp

3D tvs are already sub $3K - and now cameras will start popping up under $1k. I definitely think there will be a market for 3D porn by late this year or early next.

At least that's what I hope - squatting on several 3D domains! :1orglaugh