Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17057528)

I agree - Mitt Romney is, by far, the GOP's strongest candidate they currently have to run against Obama. I still can't figure out how McCain beat him out as the frontrunner last time.

Obama has been incorporating numerous Romney ideas and suggestions, forcing Romney to debate against himself on many of the issues. Can you say "flip-flop"?

Obama vs Romney will be the tightest race possible, but in the end, Obama will still win.... unless Obama ties Bo to his car's roof for a 12 hour road trip!

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057529)

Well, since I didn't have to make a point of getting back to work and am still making money as I absorb your nonsense I guess I have a little clue of it.

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057542)

You're big on numbers and I'm not or I would blow this one out of the waters, but my SAT's were very fucking high. I can't remember my last IQ but it was at least in that area, maybe less though.

I actually forced lower scores though to prove a point, myself and a few people I was working with. It is really funny how useless all the final test scores are and so many underachievers seem to succeed far better than these so called geniatrics!

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17057111)

i love these threads - you have someone fuck up a country, an economy and a worldwide reputation in 8 years and then blame everything on the one who has to clean the shit up

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057562)

Then I suppose we're in the same boat.

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17057583)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=1vUCGH61Uk4

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057577)

Again I didn't make an issue out of having to get back to work, but you're the genius, right? :thumbsup

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17057571)

Im just waiting for him to start cleaning it up, it's just getting worse

And I blame Bush for the shit that happened, until at least the Democrats got into office in 2006 with the battle cry "CHANGE" Things went to shit after that and they didn't do anything to stop it, Obama got in office in 2008 on the battle cry of "CHANGE" even more people are unemployed

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057595)

Who says I'm not working? Making the network larger is never a bad thing :)

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057602)

Your network? Come on, think about that :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057606)

Yep. You've no idea who I am or what I do. CamHalo? A test. :)

Also looking for tests in several niches now.

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057617)

Cams(dot)com has been around since they shot Lincoln. What's so special about your site and why would you promote a competition right in your header?

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057625)

Did you conveniently miss the word, "test"?

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057628)

And that header wasn't there earlier. It rid of my logo...weird.

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057642)

That header shit makes all the difference.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057639)

I love these threads. You have someone fuck up a country in a year almost as bad as the previous president did for 8 years, and you blame everything on the previous administration :)

Also, LOL@smut having a high SAT/IQ. That's like saying POed had a PHD.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057639)

I love these threads. You have someone fuck up a country in a year almost as bad as the previous president did for 8 years, and you blame everything on the previous administration :)

Also, LOL@smut having a high SAT/IQ. That's like saying POed had a PHD.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057639)

I love these threads. You have someone fuck up a country in a year almost as bad as the previous president did for 8 years, and you blame everything on the previous administration :)

Also, LOL@smut having a high SAT/IQ. That's like saying POed had a PHD.

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057653)

It's also the equivalent of you calling yourself a lawyer.

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057662)

And you're a lawyer? LOL! What the fuck? Aren't you scared of getting sued for being so fucking stupid? You the law! What the fuck is wrong with you?!

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057600)

and over 80% of his promises are still left unkept, or even in motion.


Sad reality about politicians anymore.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057680)

I never called myself a lawyer. Further proof that me constantly kicking your ass is just a part of every day life on GFY for you. Please continue attempting to sound intelligent:)

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17057685)

Wait, Time out, he's kept some of his promises?

Like no earmarks, letting the bill go on it's merits
Like transparency.
And who here believes that he's trying to be bipartisan?

obamanation

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057686)

If constantly kicking my ass constitutes as you not knowing the Constitution had Articles in it, then I suppose you're correct ;)

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057690)

AKA completely backpeddling when you're getting your ass kicked, then pretending you were talking about something else. Yup, you're right :)

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057690)

AKA completely backpeddling when you're getting your ass kicked, then pretending you were talking about something else. Yup, you're right :)

Originally Posted by smutnut (Post 17057702)

I finally found the solution to world peace. You need a dumb ass like you to get in the middle of everyone at war and they will come together just to extinguish you! LOL :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057701)

No one in the thread was talking about the AoC, everyone was talking about the Constitution.

Because I brought up the Articles,what makes up the Constitiution, you assumed I was talking about the AoC. You were wrong.

You didn't know the Constitution had Articles. It's ok, you're not the only one that didn't know. There are other 3rd graders out there ignorant on this subject, as well.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057712)

Too easy.....

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057719)

That's so cute! You backpeddled at least 10 times when I called you out on terms you couldn't define, only to switch topics. That's ok, I don't think I've had an easier time debating with someone pretending to be intelligent. IT was TOO easy.

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057726)

LMAO, so tell me what I couldn't define. I'd love to hear it.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057728)

You couldn't define anything, and you just moved on to the next topic. I don't think we need to re-evaluate your epic fail. If you want to go back to that thread, you can but I suspect you're too delusional to see yourself getting your ass kicked. Like I said, it was too easy. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057395)

Yeah, it's horribly fake. Shitty troll is shitty.

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057731)

I'm waiting for you to tell me what I couldn't define. Burden of proof is on the accuser :)

Originally Posted by uno (Post 17057737)

No one is taking rasmussen seriously right now. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057740)

Actually, you're asking me to prove what you didn't do. Seeing as how you didn't do anything, the burden of proof shifts to you to prove that you actually defined ANYTHING, much less created a rational argument. I'd be happy to teach you the rules of debate seeing as how you're absolutely clueless, as usual :)

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057740)

Actually, you're asking me to prove what you didn't do. Seeing as how you didn't do anything, the burden of proof shifts to you to prove that you actually defined ANYTHING, much less created a rational argument. I'd be happy to teach you the rules of debate seeing as how you're absolutely clueless, as usual :)

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057751)

No, you made the accusation, you have to back it up.


I'm waiting for you to prove what I couldn't define. It should be easy, considering you're defining it as, "anything".


Your circular reasoning is tons of fail.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057762)

Poor guy. Doesn't understand the negative proof fallacy, nor what circular reasoning is. His attempts are truly hilarious though.

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057767)

You really are that simple, aren't you?

Originally Posted by uno (Post 17057737)

No one is taking rasmussen seriously right now. :2 cents:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057771)

And the delusion/self defense mechanism has finally kicked in. Damn, this is way too easy. I was expecting someone with an acceptable IQ..

Originally Posted by mgtarheels (Post 17057776)

Even if it was to be pointed out, you'd still deny or change the topic. You've changed topics 3 times already in this thread.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17057789)

Oh the irony. The degree of difficulty just keeps getting smaller and smaller.