And you're a lawyer? LOL! What the fuck? Aren't you scared of getting sued for being so fucking stupid? You the law! What the fuck is wrong with you?!

My only problem with Obama is that he is a vagina.

I never called myself a lawyer. Further proof that me constantly kicking your ass is just a part of every day life on GFY for you. Please continue attempting to sound intelligent:)

I rest my case. Way too easy.

Wait, Time out, he's kept some of his promises?

Like no earmarks, letting the bill go on it's merits
Like transparency.
And who here believes that he's trying to be bipartisan?

obamanation

If constantly kicking my ass constitutes as you not knowing the Constitution had Articles in it, then I suppose you're correct ;)

Don't expect tarheel to actually back up anything he says. That would include brains and common sense.

Some, yes.

I think most are surprised.

AKA completely backpeddling when you're getting your ass kicked, then pretending you were talking about something else. Yup, you're right :)

No one in the thread was talking about the AoC, everyone was talking about the Constitution.

Because I brought up the Articles,what makes up the Constitiution, you assumed I was talking about the AoC. You were wrong.

You didn't know the Constitution had Articles. It's ok, you're not the only one that didn't know. There are other 3rd graders out there ignorant on this subject, as well.

I finally found the solution to world peace. You need a dumb ass like you to get in the middle of everyone at war and they will come together just to extinguish you! LOL :1orglaugh

Too easy.....

That's so cute! You backpeddled at least 10 times when I called you out on terms you couldn't define, only to switch topics. That's ok, I don't think I've had an easier time debating with someone pretending to be intelligent. IT was TOO easy.

:1orglaugh yes absolutely :1orglaugh

There has to be a catch! I guess I'm not that smart.

LMAO, so tell me what I couldn't define. I'd love to hear it.

You couldn't define anything, and you just moved on to the next topic. I don't think we need to re-evaluate your epic fail. If you want to go back to that thread, you can but I suspect you're too delusional to see yourself getting your ass kicked. Like I said, it was too easy. :1orglaugh

I'm waiting for you to tell me what I couldn't define. Burden of proof is on the accuser :)

No one is taking rasmussen seriously right now. :2 cents:

Actually, you're asking me to prove what you didn't do. Seeing as how you didn't do anything, the burden of proof shifts to you to prove that you actually defined ANYTHING, much less created a rational argument. I'd be happy to teach you the rules of debate seeing as how you're absolutely clueless, as usual :)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

No, you made the accusation, you have to back it up.


I'm waiting for you to prove what I couldn't define. It should be easy, considering you're defining it as, "anything".


Your circular reasoning is tons of fail.

No, you didn't!
Yes, you did!
No, you didn't!
Yes, you did!
You go, girl!

Poor guy. Doesn't understand the negative proof fallacy, nor what circular reasoning is. His attempts are truly hilarious though.

You really are that simple, aren't you?

And the delusion/self defense mechanism has finally kicked in. Damn, this is way too easy. I was expecting someone with an acceptable IQ..

Have the gourmet stuff for the holiday? white widow ova here.

Sometimes I wonder why I bother visiting every few weeks. Threads like these are both the reason for, and against the aforementioned.

Even if it was to be pointed out, you'd still deny or change the topic. You've changed topics 3 times already in this thread.

Oh the irony. The degree of difficulty just keeps getting smaller and smaller.

Oh hello, circular reasoning.

Are you as sure of that as you were that he wouldn't win the FIRST time?

For your own sake, stop your prognosticating. It makes you look silly and/or desperate. Just saying it over and over and over again doesn't mean it will happen either...obviously.

I don't see you admonishing BFT3K and the other liberal morons who are guaranteeing Obama will be elected for a 2nd term.

I'm trying, most people whom I could normally count on are out celebrating right now!

He's probably not as smart and Godly as you are.

he took over when the whole banking industry (and with that the whole worlds economy) was on the verge of breaking down - which luckily did not happen. otherwise we all had totally different problems now - and you would have an unemployement rate of 25%. so i would not blame him for taking care of that first instead of other things he promised.

but i have figured out by now that it is totally useless to discuss with all Anti-Obama enthusiasts, he could be shitting gold and some people would still complain that it's not platinum.

i remember posts where he bet that Fred Thompson would win...

The real unemployment rate is about 22%.

Obama and Bush, two sides of the same coin. Is Ron Paul the only one not drinking the political Kool-Aid?