GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fox news great job at debunking 9/11 for good. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=964827)

Barefootsies 04-23-2010 10:07 AM
Fiddy Sweet Deals.
:pimp

Sig.

DBS.US 04-23-2010 10:08 AM
Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition, and it was no secret, there was no conspiracy.

What part of the building code does that fall under? Are there other buildings in New York that are always wired for controlled demolition?

mayabong 04-23-2010 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 17066758)
No they didn't fall at free fall speeds. This is just a falacy you are repeating. Have you actually read the NIST report? Have you watched the video that demonstrated exactly how they measured how quickly the building fell? It was not free fall speed, period.

You guys are so ridiculous. Of course it falls on deaf ears! It's absurd on the face and not even worth arguing about.

Anyway enjoy your detective work. I feel safer knowing we have aces like you on the Internet and on the case to find the truth wherever it may hide!
Yes, the head of the nist investigation also denies molten steel sounds like he's on your side! Rofl.

mayabong 04-23-2010 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 17066781)
Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition, and it was no secret, there was no conspiracy.

What part of the building code does that fall under? Are there other buildings in New York that are always wired for controlled demolition?
Exactly my point. (although some people might not catch my sarcasm) Still people are bashing ventura even when this article confirms what ventura's been saying all along.
That flouride in the water really doing its job.

J. Falcon 04-23-2010 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17066752)
i listen to pro wrestlers not scientists for my info.
Ventura was a Marine, worked in demolition for many years and was an elected official (governor of Minnesota).

The Demon 04-23-2010 12:39 PM
Ventura also received too many piledrivers and powerbombs to make any real sense.

BFT3K 04-23-2010 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17064731)
Saw Ventura on a show the other day. He is a fucking moron.
What did you say about blanket statements again, just a few days ago?

Oh yeah, only idiots make them - now I remember.

PornoStar69 04-23-2010 02:35 PM
WTC DEMOLITION FLASHES

Heres the PROOF

https://youtube.com/watch?v=qhyu-...eature=related

The Demon 04-23-2010 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17067528)
What did you say about blanket statements again, just a few days ago?

Oh yeah, only idiots make them - now I remember.
You have never been so right before:)

theking 04-23-2010 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 17066891)
Ventura was a Marine, worked in demolition for many years and was an elected official (governor of Minnesota).
He was a Navy SEAL.

MediaGuy 04-24-2010 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 17066708)
One of my favorite arguments is that the WTC Towers fell directly in their own footprint, straight down. Well of course they did! This isn't evidence of any controlled demolition however. The largest force acting on the buildings by far was gravity. Absent another force pushing or pulling in another direction other than straight down, gravity is going to win. This is high school stuff guys!
The whole point is the gravity argument doesn't work with a straight-down vertical collapse.

High School Physics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_of_least_resistance

Had the buildings followed the gravity course, the top segment of #2 WTC for example would have slopped off the rest of the building and crashed onto the ground, since 70% of the building was still structurally sound minutes before the collapse ( http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TOWE.html ) and would have resisted it's downward momentum (which was skewed by the angle of the impact point).

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 17066758)
No they didn't fall at free fall speeds. This is just a falacy you are repeating. Have you actually read the NIST report? Have you watched the video that demonstrated exactly how they measured how quickly the building fell? It was not free fall speed, period.

You guys are so ridiculous. Of course it falls on deaf ears! It's absurd on the face and not even worth arguing about.

Anyway enjoy your detective work. I feel safer knowing we have aces like you on the Internet and on the case to find the truth wherever it may hide!
NIST admitted that #7 WTC which wasn't hit by a plane fell at free fall speed. Just watching the video you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that. But read NIST's report yourself: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

At least get some grounding in the points of contention to make your "argument".

:D

Serge Litehead 04-24-2010 04:14 PM
edit: never mind

DWB 04-24-2010 04:27 PM
Whatever the reason, you lose. Congrats.

sortie 04-24-2010 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17063982)
Fox "News"... lol
they are less credible than religion.
Ok, that caught me by surprise. :1orglaugh

Vendzilla 04-24-2010 06:09 PM
Aliens did it

sortie 04-24-2010 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17064489)
OH yeah nist! you mean this guy?


Bravo!
The guy taking questions fidgeted so much he looked like he needed to run take a shit.

Talk about being on the defensive.

dav3 04-24-2010 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17064489)
OH yeah nist! you mean this guy?


Bravo!
Well jeez, I wonder why this guy is so uninformed. It's almost like he has something to hide, or was commanded by a superior to deny the actual facts of the molten steel.

fatfoo 04-24-2010 06:46 PM
I don't know what happened. All I know is that I've been to New York once in my life and there is a common mind reading spirit of some kind there. I think it is stronger than in Toronto. New York seems like everything moves faster.

mayabong 04-24-2010 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dav3 (Post 17071900)
Well jeez, I wonder why this guy is so uninformed. It's almost like he has something to hide, or was commanded by a superior to deny the actual facts of the molten steel.
Amazing that people believe what that guys says as truth.

If you havn't seen it yet, I recommend 9/11 Missing Links which shows who was actually behind this whole fiasco. It assumes that you already know its an inside job...

PornoStar69 04-24-2010 07:04 PM
Windsor Tower 2005 madrid VS World Trade Center 2001

The Windsor Tower was engulfed in flames and burnt for 20 hours, but did not collapse, the World Trade Centre both towers collapsed within 90 minutes of being hit and engulfed in flames

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j2_srNT8-Ow

V_RocKs 04-24-2010 07:06 PM
Quote:
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building ? since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.
Haha... oh man...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 AM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123