![]() |
Quote:
That lying sack of shit should be prosecuted for treason. Good thing he collected all that insurance money. Fucking pud. http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf |
Quote:
|
The only "great job" that Fox News has ever done is sucking Dubya and Rambo Cheney's dicks for 8 years. Hell, they still go down on either one of them any chance they get.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I wouldn't worry too much. There's a reason why these Internet scientists, most of which don't have a grasp on common sense never mind advanced physics, are stuck trying to share their "truth" with people on message boards. It's because nobody takes them seriously anywhere else.
One of my favorite arguments is that the WTC Towers fell directly in their own footprint, straight down. Well of course they did! This isn't evidence of any controlled demolition however. The largest force acting on the buildings by far was gravity. Absent another force pushing or pulling in another direction other than straight down, gravity is going to win. This is high school stuff guys! |
Quote:
|
i listen to pro wrestlers not scientists for my info.
|
Quote:
You guys are so ridiculous. Of course it falls on deaf ears! It's absurd on the face and not even worth arguing about. Anyway enjoy your detective work. I feel safer knowing we have aces like you on the Internet and on the case to find the truth wherever it may hide! |
freaky videos for me
|
Fiddy Sweet Deals.
:pimp Sig. |
Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition, and it was no secret, there was no conspiracy.
What part of the building code does that fall under? Are there other buildings in New York that are always wired for controlled demolition? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That flouride in the water really doing its job. |
Quote:
|
Ventura also received too many piledrivers and powerbombs to make any real sense.
|
Quote:
Oh yeah, only idiots make them - now I remember. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
High School Physics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_of_least_resistance Had the buildings followed the gravity course, the top segment of #2 WTC for example would have slopped off the rest of the building and crashed onto the ground, since 70% of the building was still structurally sound minutes before the collapse ( http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TOWE.html ) and would have resisted it's downward momentum (which was skewed by the angle of the impact point). Quote:
At least get some grounding in the points of contention to make your "argument". :D |
edit: never mind
|
Whatever the reason, you lose. Congrats.
|
Quote:
|
Aliens did it
|
Quote:
Talk about being on the defensive. |
Quote:
|
I don't know what happened. All I know is that I've been to New York once in my life and there is a common mind reading spirit of some kind there. I think it is stronger than in Toronto. New York seems like everything moves faster.
|
Quote:
If you havn't seen it yet, I recommend 9/11 Missing Links which shows who was actually behind this whole fiasco. It assumes that you already know its an inside job... |
Windsor Tower 2005 madrid VS World Trade Center 2001
The Windsor Tower was engulfed in flames and burnt for 20 hours, but did not collapse, the World Trade Centre both towers collapsed within 90 minutes of being hit and engulfed in flames https://youtube.com/watch?v=j2_srNT8-Ow |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123