No secret? LOL

That lying sack of shit should be prosecuted for treason. Good thing he collected all that insurance money. Fucking pud.

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

You saw him on a show and he's an idiot. Why exactly is he an idiot?

The only "great job" that Fox News has ever done is sucking Dubya and Rambo Cheney's dicks for 8 years. Hell, they still go down on either one of them any chance they get.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The point of me posting this article goes right over people's heads. He's attempting to debunk ventura, but at the same time admitting what ventura (and millions of others) have been saying all along.. Bombs in the fucking building. Jeez, the future not looking good for america.

I wouldn't worry too much. There's a reason why these Internet scientists, most of which don't have a grasp on common sense never mind advanced physics, are stuck trying to share their "truth" with people on message boards. It's because nobody takes them seriously anywhere else.

One of my favorite arguments is that the WTC Towers fell directly in their own footprint, straight down. Well of course they did! This isn't evidence of any controlled demolition however. The largest force acting on the buildings by far was gravity. Absent another force pushing or pulling in another direction other than straight down, gravity is going to win. This is high school stuff guys!

Actually Richard Gage tours around the country and fills up auditoriums everywhere he goes. Yes they fell into their own footprint, but they also fell at freefall accelleration through the past of most resistence. Yes this is high school physics, unfortunately most don't apply that. Here is richard gage explaining in KINDERGARDEN terms... still everything he says falls on deaf ears.

i listen to pro wrestlers not scientists for my info.

No they didn't fall at free fall speeds. This is just a falacy you are repeating. Have you actually read the NIST report? Have you watched the video that demonstrated exactly how they measured how quickly the building fell? It was not free fall speed, period.

You guys are so ridiculous. Of course it falls on deaf ears! It's absurd on the face and not even worth arguing about.

Anyway enjoy your detective work. I feel safer knowing we have aces like you on the Internet and on the case to find the truth wherever it may hide!

freaky videos for me

Fiddy Sweet Deals.
:pimp

Sig.

Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition, and it was no secret, there was no conspiracy.

What part of the building code does that fall under? Are there other buildings in New York that are always wired for controlled demolition?

Yes, the head of the nist investigation also denies molten steel sounds like he's on your side! Rofl.

Exactly my point. (although some people might not catch my sarcasm) Still people are bashing ventura even when this article confirms what ventura's been saying all along.
That flouride in the water really doing its job.

Ventura was a Marine, worked in demolition for many years and was an elected official (governor of Minnesota).

Ventura also received too many piledrivers and powerbombs to make any real sense.

What did you say about blanket statements again, just a few days ago?

Oh yeah, only idiots make them - now I remember.

WTC DEMOLITION FLASHES

Heres the PROOF

https://youtube.com/watch?v=qhyu-...eature=related

You have never been so right before:)

He was a Navy SEAL.

The whole point is the gravity argument doesn't work with a straight-down vertical collapse.

High School Physics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_of_least_resistance

Had the buildings followed the gravity course, the top segment of #2 WTC for example would have slopped off the rest of the building and crashed onto the ground, since 70% of the building was still structurally sound minutes before the collapse ( http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TOWE.html ) and would have resisted it's downward momentum (which was skewed by the angle of the impact point).

NIST admitted that #7 WTC which wasn't hit by a plane fell at free fall speed. Just watching the video you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that. But read NIST's report yourself: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

At least get some grounding in the points of contention to make your "argument".

:D

edit: never mind

Whatever the reason, you lose. Congrats.

Ok, that caught me by surprise. :1orglaugh

Aliens did it

The guy taking questions fidgeted so much he looked like he needed to run take a shit.

Talk about being on the defensive.

Well jeez, I wonder why this guy is so uninformed. It's almost like he has something to hide, or was commanded by a superior to deny the actual facts of the molten steel.

I don't know what happened. All I know is that I've been to New York once in my life and there is a common mind reading spirit of some kind there. I think it is stronger than in Toronto. New York seems like everything moves faster.

Amazing that people believe what that guys says as truth.

If you havn't seen it yet, I recommend 9/11 Missing Links which shows who was actually behind this whole fiasco. It assumes that you already know its an inside job...

Windsor Tower 2005 madrid VS World Trade Center 2001

The Windsor Tower was engulfed in flames and burnt for 20 hours, but did not collapse, the World Trade Centre both towers collapsed within 90 minutes of being hit and engulfed in flames

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j2_srNT8-Ow

Haha... oh man...