Originally Posted by sextoyking (Post 17082322)

1. My nick is John Smith
2. A true verified scammers nick is John Jones
3. You post a thread with the title - John Smith = John Jones

If you have any smarts at all you would know what ppl would think when they saw that..

Originally Posted by SEO Expert (Post 17082786)

:2 cents:

Slam-dunk.

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 17082761)

Did you post the proof on the board or just show Eric?

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17082809)

I have mentioned enough details in the various threads that someone who was actually THAT INTERESTED could piece together the series of posts, and events, on the day mentioned and see what has been shown to Eric for the most part.

Just as someone can easily see that Batts/BigDeanEvans thread went almost a week and a half old before there was a SINGLE reply to it.

He was called a fake nick. He received an apology. Which was more than Sleazy gave me.

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 17082820)

Did you mention just those details to Eric for him to piece it together or did you give him all the info?

I think that's the issue, you will call someone out and then show partial proof in the thread, but show the entire proof to Eric.

If you can't post all the proof in the thread, maybe it shouldn't be posted at all. You should go to Eric first with your info and asked for him to be banned or for Eric to dig into it more.

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17082857)

What are you missing here?

On that day, in the context of events on that day, with the banning, remarks BDE had posted, the posted screen shot of Batts IM I received and posted, and couple of threads involved in this, it would have made sense to anyone following that day's drama.

When you come poking around a week and a half later and then making your ASSumptions based on incomplete information that's my fault? Nigga please.

If you wanna come into threads, and discussions with incomplete information and making your remarks, asking for bannings, and alike. Don't get mad at me you did not do your homework.

On that day those things WERE all available if you were so interested. But not a SINGLE person was interested for a week and a half. Got it?

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 17082864)

Now I just think you copy and paste without reading the person's response.

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 17082864)

I'm done now, back to work.

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 17082382)

See Sig !

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 17082158)

ball hard woadie

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 17082925)

word of advice to all:

Dont have alot of jalapenos with mexican food.

I had a craving for a burrito on Monday and let me tell ya my intestines are in overload and ready to kill me...

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 17083043)

Hey, The Mets won 8 in a row!

Originally Posted by ruff (Post 17083086)

Wow, I'm tired after reading all this stuff.

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083058)

Congrats bud.

I am guessing they are your favorite team?

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 17083144)

This is all Brazzers fault.

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17082748)

if someone were to call you batts, you would ask for proof, so follow your own words, you always ask for proof or you will get them banned. why not follow the same widsom.

im not hating or anything, or said you called him a scammer, but you can assume anything you want, but if you were in the other shoes, you always ask for proof, so next time someone calls you out and you ask for proof, maybe they dont have to provide any because you dont when the shoe is on the other foot.

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17082778)

Was Sleazy banned when he called me a fake nick in not just one, but multiple threads?

Nope. Case in point.

You can try and make your case for what YOU think 'Batts' name in some thread means, and that everyone on the board thinks that means scammer. However, the FACT of the matter here was, BigDeanEvans was being called a FAKE NICK in CONTEXT of the day, thread, and series of events.

You can keep beating this war drum trying to muddy the water, but when all the FACTS of that day are laid out in front of someone without a vendetta, or agenda, they see it for what it was. No one was called a scammer. At best, a fake nick. Nothing more.

Originally Posted by TeenCat (Post 17082213)

let me know if you will need any hacked gfy account :)

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17083343)

Ill bet youd get more of those sales you talk about pouring in if you actually were straight up about shit.

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083435)

Calling someone a fake nick is not calling someone a scammer. No matter how much you want it to be. Sorry champ. You can dance around in your flip flops trying to make something out of nothing, but in the end the facts just never add up.

My sales are not hurting. I've closed more business in the past two days then you will all month. But I appreciate your concern champ.
:pimp

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17083438)

If the tables were turned YOU WOULD have asked for a banning...

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083485)

Yep. Happened in the Sleazy thread(s). Was he banned? Nope.

Case closed.

:pimp

Originally Posted by PenisFace (Post 17083506)

Didn't this guy spam a thread for someone who is dying/close to dying? :disgust

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17083527)

.....

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083565)

Now go prove how much more "professional" and "mature" you are than me by making six more 'Barefootsies' threads to fill up the front page of the board and drive me more sales crying about this dead issue.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 17083601)

I made one thread

Not claiming to be more professional... But I can guarantee that the GFY community would deem me more mature than you any day of the week

Originally Posted by Varius (Post 17083599)

BF, the fact you have to remind people constantly that sales are better than ever, usually means one of three things:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083634)

Actually, I think you have that wrong bud.

People repeatedly comment on my sales, my business, how they are this or that. I only reply AFTER those remarks are made.

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 17083634)

It's not my fault I can find many ways to monetize my time. If others would do the same, they probably would do less hate and trolling on people they don't like for free. At least I am making money while on I am on the boards.

No offense meant to you friend, but you really should take the Freud lesson to those who worry about other strangers on message boards they do not like.... their business, and their reputation when they genuinely do not care. Maybe you could probe why they do the things they do. It should provide you some interesting fodder.

Originally Posted by Varius (Post 17083657)

I don't really have much interest in doing that; I doubt I spend more than 15 minutes a day here anymore, it's generally just to keep up to date with what's happening with people I have met over the years. Here and there, I'll throw an observation in when I'm bored, though :)